IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aou/nszioz/y2020i3p51-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weryfikacja Wiarygodności Informacji Zamieszczonej W Internecie – Pragmatyka Istotna Dla Zachowania Bezpieczeństwa Na Poziomie Jednostki

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Miszczak

Abstract

W erze cyfrowej, jednym z popularnych źródeł szukania informacji stał się Internet. Zamieszczane w nim informacje nie zawsze są wiarygodne. Celem artykułu było określenie, w jakim stopniu odbiorcy weryfikują wiarygodność informacji zamieszczonych w Internecie oraz scharakteryzowanie kryteriów, pomocnych przy ocenie wiarygodności informacji zamieszczonych w Internecie. Realizacja celu opierała się na analizie literatury przedmiotu oraz raportów poświęconych zagadnieniom korzystania z Internetu. W artykule zamieszczono m.in. charakterystykę atrybutów informacji składających się na jej jakość, ponieważ stanowią one główne wyznaczniki przy określaniu kryteriów oceny informacji. Tematyka jest o tyle ważna, że świadomość oraz wiedza internautów, w jaki sposób korzystać z informacji zamieszczanych w Internecie, może zabezpieczać przed cyberatakami oraz ułatwiać podejmowanie decyzji i kształtować odpowiednie zachowanie. Literatura przedmiotu i tutoriale dostarczają wskazówek, pomagających ocenić jakość informacji, ale jak wynika z badań, użytkownicy Internetu rzadko kiedy świadomie weryfikują prezentowane tam treści. Pewną trudnością jest też ustalenie, na ile cecha, jaką jest wiarygodność informacji, może być wystarczająca przy podejmowaniu decyzji.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Miszczak, 2020. "Weryfikacja Wiarygodności Informacji Zamieszczonej W Internecie – Pragmatyka Istotna Dla Zachowania Bezpieczeństwa Na Poziomie Jednostki," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 3, pages 51-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2020:i:3:p:51-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/pdf-132941-63005
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soo Young Rieh, 2002. "Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(2), pages 145-161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Affifa Sardar & Amir Manzoor & Khurram Adeel Shaikh & Liaqat Ali, 2021. "An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    2. Yan Chen & Grace Jeon & Yong-Mi Kim, 2014. "A day without a search engine: an experimental study of online and offline searches," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(4), pages 512-536, December.
    3. Kim, Jooyoung & Ahn, Sun Joo (Grace) & Kwon, Eun Sook & Reid, Leonard N., 2017. "TV advertising engagement as a state of immersion and presence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-76.
    4. Min Sook Park & JungHo Park & Hyejin Kim & Jin Hui Lee & Hyejin Park, 2023. "Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID‐19 vaccination intent," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(7), pages 846-865, July.
    5. Xiuping Zhang & Jaewon Choi, 2022. "The Importance of Social Influencer-Generated Contents for User Cognition and Emotional Attachment: An Information Relevance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Yen-Liang Chen & Chia-Ling Chang & An-Qiao Sung, 2021. "Predicting eWOM’s Influence on Purchase Intention Based on Helpfulness, Credibility, Information Quality and Professionalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.
    8. Fadhilah Mat Yamin & T. Ramayah, 2011. "The Impact of User Knowledge on Web Search Satisfaction," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 139-145, January.
    9. Devan Ray Donaldson & Paul Conway, 2015. "User conceptions of trustworthiness for digital archival documents," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2427-2444, December.
    10. Di Zou & Haoran Xie, 2021. "Vocabulary Learning Based on Learner-Generated Pictorial Annotations: Using Big Data as Learning Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Yiwei Wang & Chirag Shah, 2022. "Authentic versus synthetic: An investigation of the influences of study settings and task configurations on search behaviors," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 362-375, March.
    12. Devan Ray Donaldson & Colin Bradley LeFevre, 2022. "Records, trust, and misinformation: Using birtherism to understand the influence of conspiracy theories on human information interactions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1579-1593, November.
    13. Annaluce Latorre & Maria Vernuccio, 2013. "Ridurre il rischio percepito e generare fiducia nello shopping online attraverso gli User Generated Content," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 143-163.
    14. Chuanfu Chen & Yuan Yu & Qiong Tang & Kuei Chiu & Yan Rao & Xuan Huang & Kai Sun, 2012. "Assessing the authority of free online scholarly information," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 543-560, February.
    15. Yuwei Yan & Zhihan Lv & Bin Hu, 2018. "Building investor trust in the P2P lending platform with a focus on Chinese P2P lending platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 203-224, June.
    16. Atma Citalada & Atim Djazuli & Sri Palupi Prabandari, 2022. "The effect of advertising relevance on avoidance with advertising engagement: Perceived intrusiveness as mediation variable," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(3), pages 44-50, April.
    17. Hoffmann, Arvid O.I. & Plotkina, Daria, 2020. "Why and when does financial information affect retirement planning intentions and which consumers are more likely to act on them?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 411-431.
    18. Simona VINEREAN, 2017. "Content Marketing Strategy. Definition, Objectives and Tactics," Expert Journal of Marketing, Sprint Investify, vol. 5(2), pages 92-98.
    19. Rajni Mala & Parmod Chand, 2015. "Judgment and Decision‐Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-50, March.
    20. Berné Manero, Carmen & Ciobanu, Andreea V. & Pedraja Iglesias, Marta, 2020. "The electronic word of mouth as a context variable in the hotel management decision-making process," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2020:i:3:p:51-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Jurek (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.