IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v23y2024i2p295-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big Four Rhetorical Strategies: Carillion's Collapse

Author

Listed:
  • Fadi Alkaraan

    (University of Lincoln, UK
    Gulf University for Science &Technology, Kuwait)

  • Mohammad Albahloul

    (University of Salford, UK)

  • Tony Abdoush

    (Bournemouth University, UK)

  • Mahmoud Elmarzouky

    (University of St Andrews, UK)

  • Nadia Gulko

    (University of Lincoln, UK
    North-West University, South Africa)

Abstract

Research Question- How have the Big Four accounting firms taken advantage of impression management in reacting/responding to the public scrutiny regarding Carillion plc’s collapse? Motivation- Despite the contribution of previous research through narrative analysis domains, the conceptualisation of narrative practices remains a relatively neglected area in the extant accounting literature. This study attempts to offer insights into this domain of impression management strategies, and to examine the influencing role of external auditors on corporate strategic choices through consultancy and advisory activities. Idea- Our conceptual framework is based on Aristotle’s three pillars of rhetorical proofs: ethos, logos, and pathos. We emphasise repetitive rhetorical slogan strategies embedded in their letters in response to public inquiries. Our discussion of the findings is also based on lenses underlying domains of impression management. Data- Data underpinning this study based on Big Four accounting firms evidence /response to public investigation regarding companies collapses, (dated 2nd February 2018) to the public inquires (dated 25th January 2018) by the two parliamentary committees regarding the Carillion’ collapse. Tools- The study employs critical discourse analysis of persuasive strategies embedded in their responses to public inquiries regarding the collapse of Carillion plc, one of the top largest construction companies in the UK. Findings- Findings of our investigation of the Big Four accounting firms’ evidence to public scrutiny reveal how Big Four strategically use repetitive rhetoric slogans to shape optimistic future performance, which might be different from the feasible reality. They convey two impressions through their responses to public inquiry on Carillion failure: (i) their audit practices were good all through their engagement activities with Carillion, and (ii) they are not to blame for Carillion’s failure. The Big Four accounting firms engaged with Carillion beyond the conventional auditing norm; they engaged deeply in Carillion’s strategic choices through steering and controlling organisational resources by means of consultancies/ advisory activities and acting roles. Contribution- This study adds to the extant literature regarding how Big Four strategically use repetitive rhetoric slogans to shape optimistic future performance, which might be different from the feasible reality. Findings of this study have theoretical and managerial implications. Research limitations- Due to the use of qualitative paradigm, our findings cannot be generalised. Yet, these limitations do not underestimate the contribution of this study to the extant literature on auditing practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadi Alkaraan & Mohammad Albahloul & Tony Abdoush & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Nadia Gulko, 2024. "Big Four Rhetorical Strategies: Carillion's Collapse," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 23(2), pages 295-316, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:295-316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/23_2_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, Peter & Kurunmäki, Liisa & O'Leary, Ted, 2008. "Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 942-967.
    2. Niamh M. Brennan & Doris M. Merkl-Davies, 2014. "Rhetoric and argument in social and environmental reporting: the Dirty Laundry case," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 602-633, April.
    3. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-07-2017-3013 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Niamh M. Brennan & Jill Solomon, 2008. "Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 885-906, September.
    5. Cooper, David J. & Robson, Keith, 2006. "Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 415-444.
    6. Mohammed Hossain & Md. Tarikul Islam & Mahmood Ahmed Momin & Shamsun Nahar & Md. Samsul Alam, 2019. "Understanding Communication of Sustainability Reporting: Application of Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 563-586, December.
    7. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & Tarek Abdelfattah, 2022. "Do Key Audit Matters Signal Corporate Bankruptcy?," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(3), pages 315-334, September.
    8. Christopher Humphrey & Amanda Sonnerfeldt & Naoko Komori & Emer Curtis, 2021. "Audit and the Pursuit of Dynamic Repair," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 445-471, May.
    9. Sikka, Prem, 2015. "The hand of accounting and accountancy firms in deepening income and wealth inequalities and the economic crisis: Some evidence," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 46-62.
    10. Victoria C. Edgar & Matthias Beck & Niamh M. Brennan, 2018. "Impression management in annual report narratives: the case of the UK private finance initiative," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(6), pages 1566-1592, June.
    11. Beattie, Vivien, 2014. "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134.
    12. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & Tarek Abdelfattah, 2022. "The key audit matters and the audit cost: does governance matter?," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 195-217, December.
    13. Nour Adel & Fadi Alkaraan, 2019. "Strategic investment acquisitions performance in UK firms: the impact of managerial overconfidence," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 24-41, March.
    14. Vivien Beattie & Jane Davison, 2015. "Accounting narratives: storytelling, philosophising and quantification," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6-7), pages 655-660, December.
    15. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & Tarek Abdelfattah, 2022. "The key audit matters and the audit cost: does governance matter?," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 195-217, December.
    16. Niamh M. Brennan & Doris M. Merkl-Davies, 2014. "Rhetoric and argument in social and environmental reporting: the Dirty Laundry case," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 602-633, April.
    17. Dermarkar, Simon & Hazgui, Mouna, 2022. "How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-10-2016-2733 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Bertrand Fauré & François Cooren & Frédérik Matte, 2019. "To speak or not to speak the language of numbers: accounting as ventriloquism," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 337-361, January.
    20. Humphrey, Christopher & Loft, Anne & Woods, Margaret, 2009. "The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: Understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 810-825, August.
    21. Philip Brown & Wendy Beekes & Peter Verhoeven, 2011. "Corporate governance, accounting and finance: A review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 51(1), pages 96-172, March.
    22. Susan Addison & Frank Mueller, 2015. "The dark side of professions: the big four and tax avoidance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(8), pages 1263-1290, October.
    23. Niamh M. Brennan & Jill Solomon, 2008. "Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 885-906, September.
    24. Stuart Cooper & Richard Slack, 2015. "Reporting practice, impression management and company performance: a longitudinal and comparative analysis of water leakage disclosure," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6-7), pages 801-840, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tae Hee Kim & Sun Hye Lee & Petros Vourvachis, 2023. "Accounting Standard-Setting for an Emission Trading Scheme: The Korean Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1003-1024, February.
    2. Brennan, Niamh M. & Edgar, Victoria C. & Bradley Power, Sean, 2024. "Director and shareholder interactions at shareholder meetings: Compromising accountability in the service of colonialism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Alexey Litvinenko, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis of Altman's Z-Score and T. Jury's Cash-Based Credit Risk Models with The Application to The Production Company and The Data for The Years 2016-2022," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 518-553, September.
    4. Ahmad, Nglaa & Haque, Shamima & Islam, Muhammad Azizul, 2024. "Modern slavery disclosure regulations in the global supply Chain: A world-systems perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Durocher, Sylvain & Picard, Claire-France & Dugal, Léa, 2024. "Giving sense to and making sense of OCI: When each component makes sense, but the whole does not," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Dunne, Neil J. & Brennan, Niamh M. & Kirwan, Collette E., 2021. "Impression management and Big Four auditors: Scrutiny at a public inquiry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Hottegindre, Géraldine & Loison, Marie-Claire & Belze, Loïc, 2024. "Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Bottausci, Chiara & Robson, Keith, 2023. "“He Hears”: An essay celebrating the 25 year anniversary of The Audit Society," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Dunne, Neil J. & Brennan, Niamh M. & Kirwan, Collette E., 2023. "How the Big Four maintain and defend logic equilibrium at concurrent performances," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Sargiacomo, Massimo & Everett, Jeff & Ianni, Luca & D'Andreamatteo, Antonio, 2024. "Auditing for fraud and corruption: A public-interest-based definition and analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    11. Maroun, Warren & Solomon, Jill, 2014. "Whistle-blowing by external auditors: Seeking legitimacy for the South African Audit Profession?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 109-121.
    12. Pascal Mantel, 2018. "Territoires professionnels en tension : De la recomposition d’un monopole par l’Ordre des Experts-Comptables français," Post-Print hal-01907942, HAL.
    13. Victoria Pagan & Kathryn Haynes & Stefanie Reissner, 2023. "Accountable Selves and Responsibility Within a Global Forum," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 255-270, October.
    14. repec:osf:osfxxx:wt52r_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. King Fuei Lee, 2025. "Decoding ESG disclosure: unveiling the role of catering incentives," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 504-519, June.
    16. Canning, Mary & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2016. "Institutional work and regulatory change in the accounting profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-21.
    17. El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Pittman, Jeffrey, 2016. "Cross-country evidence on the importance of Big Four auditors to equity pricing: The mediating role of legal institutions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 60-81.
    18. Alberto Manzari & Riccardo Savio & Marika Marandola, 2024. "The Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance in Professional Sports Clubs: The Case of Italian Serie A," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(1), pages 173-173, February.
    19. Martin Kornberger & Lise Justesen & Jan Mouritsen, 2011. "“When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you” : An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 Accounting Firm," Post-Print hal-02276736, HAL.
    20. Malsch, Bertrand & Gendron, Yves, 2011. "Reining in auditors: On the dynamics of power surrounding an “innovation” in the regulatory space," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 456-476.
    21. Mattias Sandgren & Timur Uman & Mattias Nordqvist, 2023. "Accountants in family firms—a systematic literature review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 349-388, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial reporting; auditing; rhetorical strategies; impression management; content analysis; accounting; discourse analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:295-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.