IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v1y2012i14p11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditors‘ Perception Of Fraud Prevention Measures: Evidence From Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Evren Dilek Sengur

    (Istanbul University Turkey)

Abstract

The study has been carried out to identify auditors‘ perception regarding fraudprevention measures. In particular, the research focuses on the differences in perception ofthe effectiveness of fraud prevention measures among three categories of fraud: fraudulentfinancial statement, misappropriation of assets and corruption. In the analysis Friedman testand Wilcoxon test were used to examine differences in perception of the effectiveness of fraudprevention measures. The results of the analysis show that there are significant differences interms of auditors‘ ranking of fraudulent financial statements, misappropriation of assets andcorruption for the following fraud prevention measures: establishing corporate code ofconducts, effective audit commitee, and external auditors. Additionally, respondents havesignificant difference in their opinion regarding the effectiveness of developing anappropriate oversight process in preventing fraudulent financial statement, misappropriationof assets and corruption.Keywords: Fraud prevention, fraud prevention measures, prevention of fraudulent financialstatements, prevention of misappropriation of assets, prevention of corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Evren Dilek Sengur, 2012. "Auditors‘ Perception Of Fraud Prevention Measures: Evidence From Turkey," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(14), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:14:p:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/1420121/11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsty Rae & Nava Subramaniam, 2008. "Quality of internal control procedures: Antecedents and moderating effect on organisational justice and employee fraud," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(2), pages 104-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    JEL Code: M42;

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:14:p:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan-Constantin Danuletiu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.