Auditors‘ Perception Of Fraud Prevention Measures: Evidence From Turkey
The study has been carried out to identify auditors‘ perception regarding fraudprevention measures. In particular, the research focuses on the differences in perception ofthe effectiveness of fraud prevention measures among three categories of fraud: fraudulentfinancial statement, misappropriation of assets and corruption. In the analysis Friedman testand Wilcoxon test were used to examine differences in perception of the effectiveness of fraudprevention measures. The results of the analysis show that there are significant differences interms of auditors‘ ranking of fraudulent financial statements, misappropriation of assets andcorruption for the following fraud prevention measures: establishing corporate code ofconducts, effective audit commitee, and external auditors. Additionally, respondents havesignificant difference in their opinion regarding the effectiveness of developing anappropriate oversight process in preventing fraudulent financial statement, misappropriationof assets and corruption.Keywords: Fraud prevention, fraud prevention measures, prevention of fraudulent financialstatements, prevention of misappropriation of assets, prevention of corruption.
Volume (Year): 1 (2012)
Issue (Month): 14 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Kirsty Rae, 2008. "Quality of internal control procedures," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(2), pages 104-124, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:14:p:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan-Constantin Danuletiu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.