IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/journl/v2y2018i4p748-756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Expectation Gap – Evidence in 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Moin Uddin Reza
  • Md. Rezaul Karim

Abstract

Audit expectation gap has always been a captivating literature to study in the accounting and auditing philosophy. The first study on audit expectation gap was carried in 1974 and since then several literatures have been developing to identify the evidence of audit expectation gap in different responsibility centers of auditors proposing how to reduce the gap from different perspectives. As the scope of auditing is kind of defined by definitions, we tend to believe that the expectation gap must be reducing with the adoption of audit knowledge and practices over times which must be working from both the auditors’ and users of financial statements’ end. This paper aims to find out the evidence of audit expectation gap in the literatures concentrating majorly on the 21st century and summarizing the proposals made to reduce the existing expectation gap. Certain research gaps have been traced through the study of literatures which will create further avenues for the researchers of audit expectation gap to work on.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Moin Uddin Reza & Md. Rezaul Karim, 2018. "Audit Expectation Gap – Evidence in 21st Century," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 2(4), pages 748-756.
  • Handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:2:y:2018:i:4:p:748-756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/293.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/volume-2-issue-4/1577
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith A. Houghton & Christine Jubb & Michael Kend, 2011. "Materiality in the context of audit: the real expectations gap," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(6), pages 482-500, June.
    2. Anderson, John C. & Lowe, D. Jordan & Reckers, Philip M. J., 1993. "Evaluation of auditor decisions: Hindsight bias effects and the expectation gap," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 711-737, December.
    3. Javed Siddiqui & Taslima Nasreen & Aklema Choudhury-Lema, 2009. "The audit expectations gap and the role of audit education: the case of an emerging economy," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(6), pages 564-583, June.
    4. Philip Law, 2008. "An empirical comparison of non-Big 4 and Big 4 auditors' perceptions of auditor independence," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(9), pages 917-934, October.
    5. Rehana, Fowzia, 2010. "An Empirical Study on Audit Expectation Gap: Role of Auditing Education in Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 22708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Amirhossein Taebi Noghondari & Soon-Yau Foong, 2013. "Antecedents and consequences of audit expectation gap: Evidence from the banking sector in Malaysia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(5), pages 384-406, May.
    7. Philip Law, 2008. "Auditors' perceptions of reasonable assurance in audit work and the effectiveness of the audit risk model," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 160-178, July.
    8. Peter Schelluch & Wendy Green, 1996. "The Expectation Gap: the Next Step," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 6(12), pages 19-23, September.
    9. Yusuf Munir Sidani, 2007. "The audit expectation gap: evidence from Lebanon," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(3), pages 288-302, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Silviu CORDOŞ & Melinda Timea FÜLÖP, 2020. "Debates In The Literature Regarding Audit Reporting," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(22), pages 1-4.
    2. Gherai Dana Simona, 2011. "Audit Expectation Gap In The Public Sector In Romania," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 510-516, December.
    3. Taslima Akther & Fengju Xu, 2020. "Existence of the Audit Expectation Gap and Its Impact on Stakeholders’ Confidence: The Moderating Role of the Financial Reporting Council," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Taslima Akther & Xu Fengju & Md Ziaul Haque, 2019. "An Investigation ofAudit Expectation Gap in Bangladesh," Journal of Business, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Prerana Agrawal & Jacqueline Birt & Lyndie Bayne & Nikki Schonfeldt, 2022. "The use of case studies in developing students’ understanding of the concept ‘material misstatement’," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1307-1338, April.
    6. Fengju Xu & Taslima Akther, 2019. "A Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Investigate the Audit Expectation Gap and Its Impact on Investor Confidence: Perspectives from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Hassan Mansur & Anita Tangl, Dr. Prof., 2018. "How to Bridge the Audit Expectation Gap?," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 7(2), pages 61-73, April.
    8. Adriana TIRON-TUDOR & Melinda Timea FULOP & George Silviu CORDOS, 2019. "Financial Auditor Profession’s Attractiveness for Y Generation (Millennials)," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(156), pages 642-642.
    9. Ricchiute, David N., 1997. "Effects of Judgment on Memory: Experiments in Recognition Bias and Process Dissociation in a Professional Judgment Task," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 27-39, April.
    10. Nataliia SHALIMOVA & Iryna ANDROSHCHUK, 2018. "Development of approaches to definition, classification and evaluation of "expectations gap" in the broader context of engagements provided by certified auditors," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(152), pages 553-553.
    11. Judit Füredi-Fülöp, 2017. "Factors Leading to Audit Expectation Gap: An Empirical Study in a Hungarian Context," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 13(02), pages 13-23.
    12. Paul Olojede & Olayinka Erin & Osariemen Asiriuwa & Momoh Usman, 2020. "Audit expectation gap: an empirical analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Masoud, Najeb, 2017. "An empirical study of audit expectation-performance gap: The case of Libya," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-15.
    14. Pranil Prasad & Parmod Chand, 2017. "The Changing Face of the Auditor's Report: Implications for Suppliers and Users of Financial Statements," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 348-367, December.
    15. Karen‐Ann M. Dwyer & Niamh M. Brennan & Collette E. Kirwan, 2023. "Auditor Materiality in Expanded Audit Reports: More (Disclosure) is Less," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 31-45, March.
    16. Klaus Ruhnke & Catharina Schmiele & Jochen Schwind, 2010. "Die Erwartungslücke als permanentes Phänomen der Abschlussprüfung — Definitionsansatz, empirische Untersuchung und Schlussfolgerungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 394-421, June.
    17. Charron, Kimberly F. & Lowe, D. Jordan, 2008. "An examination of the influence of surprise on judges and jurors’ outcome effects," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(7), pages 1020-1033.
    18. Teodora-Cezara Porumbacean, 2022. "An Exemplification Analysis Of Materiality Computation Based On The Client'S Specifics," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 55(1), pages 134-143.
    19. Judit Füredi-Fülöp, 2015. "An Empirical Study of Audit Expectation Gap in Hungary," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 11(01), pages 37-46.
    20. Samuel Akpovwre Eyenubo & Mudzamir Mohammed & Mohammad Ali, 2017. "Audit Committee Effectiveness of Financial Reporting Quality in Listed companies in Nigeria Stock Exchange," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(6), pages 487-505, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:2:y:2018:i:4:p:748-756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.