IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/phajad/337005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Criteria for the Suitability of Apple Cultivation in Kashmir Valley, India

Author

Listed:
  • Lone, Fayaz Ahmad
  • Ganaie, M. Imran
  • Ganaie, Showkat A.
  • Bhat, M. Shafi
  • Rather, Javeed Ahmad

Abstract

The study aims to provide viable criteria to assess land suitability for apple growing in Kashmir Valley, India. It used a Delphi survey and the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) approach to determine factors influencing apple production. The evaluation criteria were obtained through multiple rounds of the Delphi survey of stakeholders. The Delphi outcome was extended to enable prioritization of the criteria, using a pair-wise comparison process. Results show that experts value physical and economic considerations (accounting for 87% of the overall weight) more than social factors. Furthermore, location-specific factors (i.e., cost-benefit ratio and landholding size) have significant bearings on land suitability for apple in the study area. The Delphi-AHP method proved to be useful as it incorporated core issues of agricultural land use by creating a common framework for suitability evaluation and eliminated uncertainties in the decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Lone, Fayaz Ahmad & Ganaie, M. Imran & Ganaie, Showkat A. & Bhat, M. Shafi & Rather, Javeed Ahmad, 2023. "Evaluation Criteria for the Suitability of Apple Cultivation in Kashmir Valley, India," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 20(01), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:phajad:337005
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.337005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/337005/files/AJAD%2020.1_Lone%20et%20al..pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.337005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frei, Frances X. & Harker, Patrick T., 1999. "Measuring aggregate process performance using AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 436-442, July.
    2. Sumira Zaz & Shakil Romshoo, 2012. "Assessing the geoindicators of land degradation in the Kashmir Himalayan region, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1219-1245, November.
    3. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bentes, Alexandre Veronese & Carneiro, Jorge & da Silva, Jorge Ferreira & Kimura, Herbert, 2012. "Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1790-1799.
    2. A Ishizaka & D Balkenborg & T Kaplan, 2011. "Does AHP help us make a choice? An experimental evaluation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(10), pages 1801-1812, October.
    3. Nuria Padilla-Garrido & Francisco Aguado-Correa & Virginia Cortijo-Gallego & Francisca López-Camacho, 2014. "Multicriteria Decision Making in Health Care Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Microsoft Excel," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(7), pages 931-935, October.
    4. Anu Antony & Ansted Iype Joseph, 2017. "Influence of Behavioural Factors Affecting Investment Decision—An AHP Analysis," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 107-114, December.
    5. Lahouel, Béchir Ben & Zaied, Younes Ben & Song, Yaoyao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2021. "Corporate social performance and financial performance relationship: A data envelopment analysis approach without explicit input," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    6. Petra Tausl Prochazkova & Michaela Krechovska & Ladislav Lukas, 2015. "Effectiveness of entrepreneurship policies: some evaluation research perspectives," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(39), pages 706-706, May.
    7. Joel Bigley, 2018. "Assembling Frameworks for Strategic Innovation Enactment: Enhancing Transformational Agility through Situational Scanning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    9. Ted F. Bowlds & John M. Fossaceca & Ronald Iammartino, 2018. "Software obsolescence risk assessment approach using multicriteria decision‐making," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 455-465, September.
    10. Mats Wilhelmsson & Jianyu Zhao, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Housing Market Segments: The Lender’s Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Benedetto Barabino & Nicola Aldo Cabras & Claudio Conversano & Alessandro Olivo, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 1045-1080, June.
    12. M. Ishaq Bhatti & H. Awan & Z. Razaq, 2014. "The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3127-3143, November.
    13. Mandic, Ksenija & Delibasic, Boris & Knezevic, Snezana & Benkovic, Sladjana, 2014. "Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-37.
    14. James G. Dolan & Emily Boohaker & Jeroan Allison & Thomas F. Imperiale, 2013. "Patients’ Preferences and Priorities Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 59-70, January.
    15. A Ishizaka & D Balkenborg & T Kaplan, 2011. "Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 700-710, April.
    16. P Ji & R Jiang, 2003. "Scale transitivity in the AHP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(8), pages 896-905, August.
    17. Keon Chul Park & Dong-Hee Shin, 2017. "Security assessment framework for IoT service," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 193-209, January.
    18. Luis Armando Guananga & Rocío Poveda-Bautista & Mónica García-Melón, 2023. "Management Indicators for the Organisational Sustainability of Associative Productive Ventures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Shan-e-hyder Soomro & Caihong Hu & Muhammad Waseem Boota & Zubair Ahmed & Liu Chengshuai & Han Zhenyue & Li Xiang & Mairaj Hyder Alias Aamir Soomro, 2022. "River Flood Susceptibility and Basin Maturity Analyzed Using a Coupled Approach of Geo-morphometric Parameters and SWAT Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(7), pages 2131-2160, May.
    20. Debaleena Chatterjee & Protik Basu, 2023. "Classification Analysis for Brand Loyalty Determination," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 106-120, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:phajad:337005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/searcph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.