IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/362861.html

Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, attitudes, and experiences between food system and non–food system essential workers

Author

Listed:
  • Smarsh, Brianna
  • Yankey, David
  • Hung, Mei-Chuan
  • Blanck, Heidi
  • Kriss, Jennifer
  • Flynn, Michael
  • Lu, Peng-Jun
  • McGarry, Sherri
  • Eastlake, Adrienne
  • Lainz, Alfonso
  • Singleton, James
  • Lincoln, Jennifer

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected the health of food system (FS) essential workers compared with other essential and non-essential workers. Even greater disparity exists for workers in certain FS work settings and for certain FS worker subpopulations. We analyzed essential worker respondents (n = 151,789) in May–Novem­ber 2021 data from the National Immu­nization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM) to assess and characterize COVID-19 vaccination uptake (≥1 dose) and intent (reachable, reluctant), attitudes about COVID-19 and the vaccine, and experiences and difficulties getting the vaccine. We compared rates, overall and by certain character­istics, between workers of the same group, and between FS (n = 17,414) and non–food system (NFS) worker groups (n = 134,375), to determine if differences exist. FS worker groups were classi­fied as “agriculture, forestry, fishing, or hunting” (AFFH; n = 2,730); “food manufacturing facility” (FMF; n = 3,495); and “food and beverage store” (FBS; n = 11,189). Compared with NFS workers, significantly lower percentages of FS workers reported >1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine requirements at work or school, but overall vaccine experiences and difficulties among vaccinated FS workers were statistically similar to NFS workers. When we examined intent regarding COVID-19 vaccination among unvaccinated FS workers com­pared with NFS counterparts, we found a higher percentage of FMF and FBS workers were reach­able whereas a higher percentage of AFFH workers were reluctant about vaccination, with differences by sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, results showed differences in uptake, intent, and attitudes between worker groups and by some sociodemographic characteristics. The findings reflect the diversity of FS workers and underscore the importance of collecting occupational data to assess health inequalities and of tailoring efforts to worker groups to improve confidence and uptake of vaccinations for infectious diseases such as COVID-19. The findings can inform future re­search, adult infectious disease interventions, and emergency management planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Smarsh, Brianna & Yankey, David & Hung, Mei-Chuan & Blanck, Heidi & Kriss, Jennifer & Flynn, Michael & Lu, Peng-Jun & McGarry, Sherri & Eastlake, Adrienne & Lainz, Alfonso & Singleton, James & Lincoln, 2024. "Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, attitudes, and experiences between food system and non–food system essential workers," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 13(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362861/files/1197.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahonen, E.Q. & Fujishiro, K. & Cunningham, T. & Flynn, M., 2018. "Work as an inclusive part of population health inequities research and prevention," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(3), pages 306-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julie Vanderleyden & Hyojin Seo & Christophe Vanroelen & Deborah Moortel, 2025. "Employment Quality: A Social Determinant of Health and Well-Being in a Changing Labor Market in Korea," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 733-770, January.
    2. Marie Astrid Garrido & Verónica Encina & María Teresa Solis-Soto & Manuel Parra & María Fernanda Bauleo & Claudia Meneses & Katja Radon, 2020. "Courses on Basic Occupational Safety and Health: A Train-the-Trainer Educational Program for Rural Areas of Latin America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Michael A. Flynn & Pietra Check & Andrea L. Steege & Jacqueline M. Sivén & Laura N. Syron, 2021. "Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Kaori Fujishiro & Franziska Koessler, 2020. "Comparing self-reported and O*NET-based assessments of job control as predictors of self-rated health for non-Hispanic whites and racial/ethnic minorities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Amel Omari & Miriam R. Siegel & Carissa M. Rocheleau & Kaori Fujishiro & Kristen Van Buren & Dallas Shi & A.J. Agopian & Suzanne M. Gilboa & Paul A. Romitti, 2024. "Multiple Job Holding, Job Changes, and Associations with Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-Related Hypertension in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Preethi Pratap & Alison Dickson & Marsha Love & Joe Zanoni & Caitlin Donato & Michael A. Flynn & Paul A. Schulte, 2021. "Public Health Impacts of Underemployment and Unemployment in the United States: Exploring Perceptions, Gaps and Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Jetha, Arif & Liao, Qing & Shahidi, Faraz Vahid & Vu, Viet & Biswas, Aviroop & Smith, Brendan & Smith, Peter, 2025. "Machine learning and the labor market: A portrait of occupational and worker inequities in Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    8. Michael K. Lemke & Adam Hege & Alexander M. Crizzle, 2023. "An Agenda for Advancing Research and Prevention at the Nexus of Work Organization, Occupational Stress, and Mental Health and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-12, May.
    9. Kaori Fujishiro & Emily Q. Ahonen & Megan Winkler, 2022. "Investigating Employment Quality for Population Health and Health Equity: A Perspective of Power," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Hiram Beltran-Sanchez & Noreen Goldman & Anne Pebley & Josefina Flores Morales, 2020. "Calloused hands, shorter life? Occupation and older-age survival in Mexico," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(32), pages 875-900.
    11. Buszkiewicz, James H. & Hajat, Anjum & Hill, Heather D. & Otten, Jennifer J. & Drewnowski, Adam, 2023. "Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in the association between higher state minimum wages and health and mental well-being in US adults with low educational attainment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    12. Nurlan Amanbek & Laura A. Mamayeva & Gaukhar M. Rakhimzhanova, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Results of a comprehensive assessment of the quality of services to the population with the use of statistical methods," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1322-1333, December.
    13. Virginia Gunn & Bertina Kreshpaj & Nuria Matilla-Santander & Emilia F. Vignola & David H. Wegman & Christer Hogstedt & Emily Q. Ahonen & Theo Bodin & Cecilia Orellana & Sherry Baron & Carles Muntaner , 2022. "Initiatives Addressing Precarious Employment and Its Effects on Workers’ Health and Well-Being: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-35, February.
    14. Prem Borle & Kathrin Reichel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2021. "Is There a Sampling Bias in Research on Work-Related Technostress? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Technostress and the Role of Socioeconomic Position," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Pacca, Lucia & Gaye, S. Amina & Brenowitz, Willa D. & Fujishiro, Kaori & Glymour, M. Maria & Harrati, Amal & Vable, Anusha M., 2025. "Do type, timing and duration of life course non-employment differentially predict dementia risk? An application of sequence analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    16. Steffen Torp & Jon Reiersen, 2020. "Globalization, Work, and Health: A Nordic Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Julia F. Lippert & Mackenzie B. Furnari & Charlie W. Kriebel, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Occupational Stress in Restaurant Work: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Allison Milner & Anna J. Scovelle & Tania L. King & Claudia H. Marck & Ashley McAllister & Anne M. Kavanagh & Marissa Shields & Eszter Török & Adrienne O’Neil, 2019. "Gendered Working Environments as a Determinant of Mental Health Inequalities: A Protocol for a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-8, April.
    19. David Stuer & Ans De Vos & Beatrice I.J.M. Van der Heijden & Jos Akkermans, 2019. "A Sustainable Career Perspective of Work Ability: The Importance of Resources across the Lifespan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Shannon C. Montgomery & Joseph G. Grzywacz, 2022. "Work as a Social Determinant of Racial Health Inequalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.