IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/359387.html

Multistakeholder Policy Formulation and Action Planning for Urban Agriculture in Lima, Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Dubbeling, Marielle C. E.
  • Merzthal, Gunther
  • Soto, Noemi

Abstract

Multistakeholder processes are increasingly consid­ered to be an important element of policy design, action planning, and implementation. By involving a broad base of stakeholders, municipal authorities are more likely to develop policies and programs that will meet the needs of both the municipality and its constituents, and are thus more inclusive and successful in their implementation. Because of its multisectoral character, with impacts on land use planning, health, food security, and economic development, among others, urban agriculture development calls for the involvement of multiple stakeholders, including individuals, and groups and organizations from both nongovernmental as well as governmental sectors. In doing so, requirements for setting up and managing successful multistakeholder processes, including sufficient financial resources, time, training, and creating mutual trust, have to be taken into account. This article will illustrate the multistakeholder process taken and lessons learned by the district of Villa María del Triunfo in Lima, Peru. It shows how such processes can result in urban agriculture becoming institutionalized, while at the same time providing concrete benefits for urban producers (such as enhanced food security and employment) and the city as a whole. Linking project implementation to policy formulation, including urban agriculture in land use planning, providing it with an institutional home, and regular monitoring and empowerment of urban farmer organizations prove to be key elements to ensure the sustainability and consolidation of an urban agriculture policy and program beyond the period of a given political administration and to plan for its future up-scaling.

Suggested Citation

  • Dubbeling, Marielle C. E. & Merzthal, Gunther & Soto, Noemi, 2010. "Multistakeholder Policy Formulation and Action Planning for Urban Agriculture in Lima, Peru," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 1(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:359387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/359387/files/30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Mendes, 2008. "Implementing Social and Environmental Policies in Cities: The Case of Food Policy in Vancouver, Canada," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 942-967, December.
    2. Nicolas Faysse, 2006. "Troubles on the way: An analysis of the challenges faced by multi‐stakeholder platforms," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(3), pages 219-229, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara A. L. Smaal & Joost Dessein & Barend J. Wind & Elke Rogge, 2021. "Social justice-oriented narratives in European urban food strategies: Bringing forward redistribution, recognition and representation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Catherine Ragasa & Cristina Alvarez-Mingote & Paul McNamara, 2024. "Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption: Multi-level Analysis from Malawi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1093-1146, October.
    3. Alejandro Rojas & Will Valley & Brent Mansfield & Elena Orrego & Gwen E. Chapman & Yael Harlap, 2011. "Toward Food System Sustainability through School Food System Change: Think&EatGreen@School and the Making of a Community-University Research Alliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Jana Baldy & Sylvia Kruse, 2019. "Food Democracy from the Top Down? State-Driven Participation Processes for Local Food System Transformations towards Sustainability," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 68-80.
    5. Nibedita Saha & Do Le Nhu Quynh & Tomas Sáha & Petr Sáha, 2017. "Multi-stakeholder initiatives in Vietnam to meet the societal challenges of horizon 2020," Marketing and Branding Research, EUROKD, vol. 4(1), pages 100-111.
    6. Ana Moragues-Faus & Roberta Sonnino, 2019. "Re-assembling sustainable food cities: An exploration of translocal governance and its multiple agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 778-794, March.
    7. Szoke-Burke, Sam & Werker, Eric, 2021. "Benefit sharing, power, and the performance of multi-stakeholder institutions at Ghana's Ahafo mine," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2020. "Measuring the urban sustainable development in cities through a Composite Index: The case of Portugal," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 507-520, July.
    9. Amy Hanser, 2021. "Good Food in the City: How Cultural Ideas About Food Shape Street Vending Regulation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 519-534, May.
    10. Mohammed Basheer & Victor Nechifor & Alvaro Calzadilla & Claudia Ringler & David Hulme & Julien J. Harou, 2022. "Balancing national economic policy outcomes for sustainable development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Jana Baldy, 2019. "Framing a Sustainable Local Food System—How Smaller Cities in Southern Germany Are Facing a New Policy Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Moragues-Faus, Ana & Battersby, Jane, 2021. "Urban food policies for a sustainable and just future: Concepts and tools for a renewed agenda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Jeanne Pahun & Eve Fouilleux, 2022. "Organisational troubles in policy integration. French local food policies in the making," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 247-269, September.
    14. Vara-Sánchez, Isabel & Gallar-Hernández, David & García-García, Lidia & Morán Alonso, Nerea & Moragues-Faus, Ana, 2021. "The co-production of urban food policies: Exploring the emergence of new governance spaces in three Spanish cities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Martha Traverso-Yepez & Kelly Hunter, 2016. "From “Healthy Eating†to a Holistic Approach to Current Food Environments," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, August.
    16. Lys Affre & Laurence Guillaumie & Sophie Dupéré & Geneviève Mercille & Marilou Fortin-Guay, 2024. "Citizen Participation Practices in the Governance of Local Food Systems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Ashley McInnes & Evan Fraser & Ze’ev Gedalof & Jennifer Silver, 2017. "A quantitative analysis of food movement convergence in four Canadian provinces," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 787-804, December.
    18. Mat Jones & Sarah Hills, 2021. "Scaling up Action on Urban Sustainable Food Systems in the United Kingdom: Agenda Setting, Networking, and Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    19. Maarten Crivits & Charlotte Prové & Thomas Block & Joost Dessein, 2016. "Four Perspectives of Sustainability Applied to the Local Food Strategy of Ghent (Belgium): Need for a Cycle of Democratic Participation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Andersson, Krister & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. & Nehring, Ryan & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Why do multistakeholder processes emerge and flourish? Identifying and operationalizing the leading hypotheses," IFPRI discussion papers 2312, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:359387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.