A Profile of Farmers' Market Consumers and the Perceived Advantages of Produce Sold at Farmers' Markets
This study examines responses of 336 produce consumers in San Luis Obispo County, California, to compare the profile of farmersÂ’' market shoppers to those who do not shop at farmers'Â’ markets. The characteristics of produce sold in farmersÂ’' markets are compared to those sold at supermarkets to determine why consumers shop in farmersÂ’' markets. This examination of the demographic profile of farmersÂ’' market produce consumers indicates that they are more likely to be female, married, and have completed post graduate work. The age levels, income levels, and employment status are similar between farmers'Â’ market shoppers and farmers'Â’ market non-shoppers. Farmers'Â’ market shoppers indicate that cooking and family meals are important to them. Consumers indicate that quality and value are among the most important attributes when purchasing produce. Consumers perceive that farmers'Â’ market produce is fresher looking, fresher tasting, a higher-quality product, a better value for the money, more reasonably priced, more likely to be grown in their country, more likely to be locally grown, more likely to be good for the environment, and more likely to be traceable to the processor and grower when compared to supermarket produce. However, many consumers do not shop at farmersÂ’' markets due to a lack of convenience.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Wolf, Marianne McGarry & Berrenson, Eric, 2003. "A Comparison Of Purchasing Behaviors And Consumer Profiles At San Luis Obispo'S Thursday Night Farmers' Market: A Case Study," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 34(01), March.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.