IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/330346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational-economic foundations of formation of value added in grain production

Author

Listed:
  • Svitovyi, Oleksandr
  • Kirdan, Oleksandr
  • Gechbaia, Badri

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to assess the current state and substantiate the prospects for the formation of value added in grain production of Ukraine, based on the theoretical and organizational-economic foundations of these processes. Methodology / approach. Among the general scientific methods for research, the authors applied the following: comparison – to compare the amount and structure of value added; generalization – when determining the total amount of value added; analysis and synthesis – in the process of studying the formation of value added as one whole, after analyzing the components of this indicator; modeling (Box-Jenkins method) – in the process of creating a model of the optimal value added and gross grain harvesting. The following interdisciplinary and special methods were also used: calculation-and-design – when determining the optimal option for the formation and distribution of value added; calculation – for calculating the components of value added. Results. The theoretical aspects of the formation of value added are summarized and the authors’ own view on problematic issues is formulated. As a result of the analysis of the current state of grain production, it was established that over the past two decades, the growth of the gross collection of grain crops (by 2.6 times) occurred only due to increased productivity, and the production of grain processing products during the specified period has significantly decreased. Calculations performed on intensive resource-saving technologies for growing grain crops indicate that their use can increase value added due to a decrease in the unit cost of production. The presented author’s calculations of the formation of value added in the “wheat-flour-bread” chain showed that most of the value added is created in the process of grain processing. Forecast indicators of the production of the main agricultural crops, the amount of value added and profit indicate significant prospects for their growth. Originality / scientific novelty. The classification of the main factors that influence the formation of value added in grain production has been improved, and their structural-and-logical scheme has been constructed. Practical approaches to determining the interrelationship of structural elements of value added in the industry have gained further development. The improved variants of intensive resource-saving technologies for the cultivation of the main agricultural crops are calculated and proposed for implementation and their characteristics are given. For the first time, there were modeled the forecast indicators of the production of corn for grain and wheat for the period up to 2027, as well as the amount of value added and profit at different levels of profitability. Practical value / implications. The use of the proposed intensive resource-saving technologies for growing major agricultural crops, compliance with the progressive provisions of the organization of the use of material and human resources will significantly improve the efficiency of grain production. In order to significantly increase the value added in grain production, the need to significantly increase the production of processed products and finished products from grain has been proved. This will have a positive impact on the growth of national income and gross domestic product.

Suggested Citation

  • Svitovyi, Oleksandr & Kirdan, Oleksandr & Gechbaia, Badri, 2022. "Organizational-economic foundations of formation of value added in grain production," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330346
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330346/files/10_Svitovyi_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Xiaofei & Wang, Ping & Pal, Raktim, 2021. "The effects of agro-food supply chain integration on product quality and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese agro-food processing business," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Sumets, Alexander & Kniaz, Sviatoslav & Heorhiadi, Nelli & Skrynkovskyy, Ruslan & Matsuk, Vasylyna, 2022. "Methodological toolkit for assessing the level of stability of agricultural enterprises," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(01), March.
    3. Olexander Svitovyi, 2016. "The Grain Products Subcomplex Of Agro Industrial Complex Of Ukraine: Strategy Of Value Added Management," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 2(2).
    4. Kamble, Sachin S. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Gawankar, Shradha A., 2020. "Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 179-194.
    5. Glubish, Lesya, 2021. "Barriers to creating of competitive advantages in the sectors of food provision sphere of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(01), March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2024. "Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1321-1368, November.
    3. Chen, Jen-Yi, 2022. "Responsible sourcing and supply chain traceability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    4. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.
    6. Jiangning Cao & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2023. "Analyzing and Prioritizing the Barriers and Solutions of Sustainable Agriculture for Promoting Sustainable Development Goals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Tuğçe Taşkıner & Bilge Bilgen, 2021. "Optimization Models for Harvest and Production Planning in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Ansar Gholipour & Ahmad Sadegheih & Ali Mostafaeipour & Mohammad Bagher Fakhrzad, 2024. "Designing an optimal multi-objective model for a sustainable closed-loop supply chain: a case study of pomegranate in Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3993-4027, February.
    9. Zhao, Xiaofei & Wang, Ping & Pal, Raktim, 2021. "The effects of agro-food supply chain integration on product quality and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese agro-food processing business," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Ma, Jing & Li, Qing & Zhao, Qiuyun & Liou, Jennhae & Li, Chen, 2024. "From bytes to green: The impact of supply chain digitization on corporate green innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Jack Ryan A. Isahac, 2024. "“Attitudes Toward Sustainable Agriculture Concepts and Practices Among Students of School of Agriculture of Sulu State Collegeâ€," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 1292-1313, August.
    12. Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Tajbakhsh, Alireza & Mosadegh Sedghy, Bahareh, 2021. "The reflection of competition and coordination on organic agribusiness supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Lin, Jiabao & Fan, Yuchen, 2024. "Seeking sustainable performance through organizational resilience: Examining the role of supply chain integration and digital technology usage," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Mohannad Alobid & Said Abujudeh & István Szűcs, 2022. "The Role of Blockchain in Revolutionizing the Agricultural Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Kedar Shiralkar & Arunkumar Bongale & Satish Kumar & Ketan Kotecha & Chander Prakash, 2021. "Assessment of the Benefits of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Adoption on Downstream Supply Chain Performance of the Retail Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Esteve Nadal-Roig & Lluís Miquel Plà-Aragonès & Víctor Manuel Albornoz, 2023. "Supply Chains: Planning the Transportation of Animals among Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Julia Francesca Wünsche & Fredrik Fernqvist, 2022. "The Potential of Blockchain Technology in the Transition towards Sustainable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Sneha Kumari & V. G. Venkatesh & Felix Ter Chian Tan & S. Vijayakumar Bharathi & M. Ramasubramanian & Yangyan Shi, 2025. "Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence on agriculture supply chain: a comprehensive review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 1573-1617, May.
    19. Philippos Karipidis & Sotiria Karypidou, 2021. "Factors that Impact Farmers’ Organic Conversion Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Balezentis, Tomas & Zickiene, Agne & Volkov, Artiom & Streimikiene, Dalia & Morkunas, Mangirdas & Dabkiene, Vida & Ribasauskiene, Erika, 2023. "Measures for the viable agri-food supply chains: A multi-criteria approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.