IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/308587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of non-financial reporting of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuk, Valerii
  • Zamula, Iryna
  • Liudvenko, Dmytro
  • Popko, Yevheniya

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to develop non-financial reporting of medium-sized agricultural enterprises of Ukraine through the definition of the main activities of the enterprise, which are subject to disclosure in non-financial reporting, to meet the information needs of internal and external stakeholders of such enterprises. Methodology / approach. The research methods are based on dialectical and systematic approaches to assessing the current state of non-financial reporting of Ukrainian enterprises. Methods of analysis and synthesis are used to determine the main activities of agricultural enterprises, which are subject to disclosure in non-financial statements, based on requests from interested users. To obtain data on information requests of internal stakeholders of the surveyed enterprises, continuous initial observation was applied, and external sample holders were subjected to continuous sample observation. Internal (in particular, the population units are employees and owners) and external (in particular, the population units are contractors, consumers, creditors, investors, government agencies, NGOs) stakeholders are selected as the object of observation. Results. According to the results of the study, in the formation of non-financial reporting agricultural enterprises of Ukraine should pay special attention to areas of activity that are of greatest interest to stakeholders: development and improvement of working conditions, investment in regional development, respect for human rights, implementation of CSR programs in the supply chain. The main activities of the company, which are subject to disclosure in non-financial reporting, provide an opportunity to meet the information needs of internal and external stakeholders. Originality / scientific novelty. Failure to meet information needs of both internal and external stakeholders of agricultural enterprises has necessitated the improvement of organizational and methodological approaches to the formation of non-financial reporting of agricultural enterprises by identifying the main activities of the enterprise to be disclosed in non-financial reporting. The use of these areas creates an opportunity for stakeholders to obtain data that provide integrated information on the activities of agricultural enterprises. Practical value / implications. Disclosure of information in accordance with certain main activities of the enterprise will reduce the cost of users to obtain, process and systematize data, which will reduce inefficient use of resources in the preparation, substantiation, implementation and evaluation of economic decisions, as well as increase analytical capabilities for its use in the interest of stakeholders. The identified main areas of activity can be used as a basis for developing a long-term strategy for the formation of non-financial reporting of the agricultural enterprise, which will simplify the preparation of information for its full disclosure. This will increase the level of transparency of enterprises and will serve as a tool for building their positive reputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuk, Valerii & Zamula, Iryna & Liudvenko, Dmytro & Popko, Yevheniya, 2020. "Development of non-financial reporting of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:308587
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308587/files/5_Zhuk_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Dobre & Georgiana Oana Stanila & Laura Brad, 2015. "The Influence of Environmental and Social Performance on Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania’s Listed Entities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-41, March.
    2. Gianluca Vitale & Sebastiano Cupertino & Loredana Rinaldi & Angelo Riccaboni, 2019. "Integrated Management Approach Towards Sustainability: An Egyptian Business Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak, 2018. "The Development Perspectives of Sustainable Management Accounting in Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Emilio Abad-Segura & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña, 2019. "The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Iryna Zamula & Maryna Tanasiieva & Vitalii Travin & Vitalii Nitsenko & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Assessment of the Profitability of Environmental Activities in Forestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Elisa Truant & Laura Corazza & Simone Domenico Scagnelli, 2017. "Sustainability and Risk Disclosure: An Exploratory Study on Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Michaela Bednárová & Roman Klimko & Eva Rievajová, 2019. "From Environmental Reporting to Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Renato Camodeca & Alex Almici & Umberto Sagliaschi, 2018. "Sustainability Disclosure in Integrated Reporting: Does It Matter to Investors? A Cheap Talk Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-34, November.
    9. David Procházka (ed.), 2017. "New Trends in Finance and Accounting," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-319-49559-0, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nataliia Shevchuk, 2023. "Normative and Legal Regulation for Integrated Reporting," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 56-67, March.
    2. Mukoviz, Vasil & Leshchii, Lesya & Khodakivska, Olga & Prokopova, Olena & Kuzub, Mykhailo, 2022. "Accounting for transactions costs of agricultural producers in the shadow economy," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(2), June.
    3. Petro Sabluk & Mykhailo Prodanchuk & Nataliia Shevchuk, 2022. "Improving the Evaluation of the Management System's Effectiveness Based on Integrated Reporting," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 33-42, June.
    4. Yuliia Bezdushna & Mykhailo Prodanchuk & Оlha Panchenko & Tetiana Storozhuk & Lesia Kucher, 2024. "Accounting as a tool for assessing indicators of achieving sustainable development goals," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4), December.
    5. Fulop Kinga-Erzsebet, 2023. "Integrated Reporting To Regional Water And Sewerage Operators In Romania," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 146-152, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmytro Liudvenko, 2020. "Information Needs of an Environmentally Conscious Society regarding the Functioning of Animal Husbandry Enterprises," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 22-29, December.
    2. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Delia-Mioara Popescu & Elena Anghel, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Bambang Sutopo & Sebastian Kot & Arum Kusumaningdyah Adiati & Lina Nur Ardila, 2018. "Sustainability Reporting and Value Relevance of Financial Statements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Nursyazwani Mohd Fuzi & Sabrinah Adam & Mohamad Rohieszan Ramdan & Sharon Yong Yee Ong & Juliana Osman & Subramaniam Kolandan & Siti Zubaidah Mohd Ariffin & Nor Sa’adah Jamaluddin & Karmilah Abdullah, 2022. "Sustainability Management Accounting and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Environmental Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Woo-yeul Baek & Hyun-seok Song & Doo-Han Kim & Kevin K. Byon, 2020. "Cause-Related Marketing and Purchase Intention toward Team-Licensed Products: Moderating Effects of Sport Consumers’ Altruism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Ioan-Bogdan ROBU & Costel ISTRATE & Ionut Viorel HERGHILIGIU, 2019. "The Use of Audit Opinion in Estimating the Financial Reporting Transparency Level," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(153), pages 1-79.
    7. repec:ehu:cuader:49757 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Tatiana Cuervo-Carabel & Rafael Repiso, 2023. "Presence and Impact of the Articles on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Different Research Areas," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    9. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Tomáš Meluzín & Stanislav Škapa, 2020. "Sustainable Investing Model for Decision Makers (Based On Research of Manufacturing Industry in the Czech Republic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Armando Della Porta & Francesco De Luca & Chiara Aufiero, 2023. ""Radicare" la sostenibilit? nella strategia attraverso i sistemi di management control: un caso di studio relativo ad una Pmi," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2), pages 43-68.
    11. Simona Šarotar Žižek & Matjaž Mulej & Amna Potočnik, 2021. "The Sustainable Socially Responsible Society: Well-Being Society 6.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
    12. Kira J. Cooper & Robert B. Gibson, 2022. "A Novel Framework for Inner-Outer Sustainability Assessment," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Fuan Li & Xingyuan Wang & Rajiv Kashyap, 2019. "Socially Responsible Practice and CSR Orientation of Chinese Managers: The Role of Confucian Ethics and Confucian Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Hamzeh Al Amosh & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Husam Ananzeh, 2024. "Terrorist attacks and environmental social and governance performance: Evidence from cross‐country panel data," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 210-223, January.
    15. Anca Băndoi & Claudiu George Bocean & Mara Del Baldo & Lucian Mandache & Leonardo Geo Mănescu & Cătălina Soriana Sitnikov, 2021. "Including Sustainable Reporting Practices in Corporate Management Reports: Assessing the Impact of Transparency on Economic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Mariusz Karwowski & Monika Raulinajtys‐Grzybek, 2021. "The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1270-1284, July.
    17. Domenico Raucci & Lara Tarquinio, 2020. "Sustainability Performance Indicators and Non-Financial Information Reporting. Evidence from the Italian Case," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Belén Payán-Sánchez & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Diego Vazquez-Brust & Natalia Yakovleva & Miguel Pérez-Valls, 2021. "Open Innovation for Sustainability or Not: Literature Reviews of Global Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    19. Imke Rhoden & Christopher Stephen Ball & Stefan Vögele & Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2023. "Minding the gap‐relating disclosure to contexts of sustainability reporting in the automotive industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 846-857, March.
    20. Thilini Cooray & Samanthi Senaratne & A. D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Roshan Herath & Dileepa Samudrage, 2020. "Does Integrated Reporting Enhance the Value Relevance of Information? Evidence from Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, October.
    21. Ufuk Bingöl & Fatih Ayhan, 2020. "The Impact of NEET and Labor Market Indicators on Human Development: A Panel Data Analysis for EU-28 Countries," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(79), pages 441-468, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:308587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.