IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aergaa/330605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the Risks of the Greek Crisis in Aquaculture: A SWOT Analysis of the Mediterranean Mussel Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Theodorou, J.A.
  • Tzovenis, I.

Abstract

A SWOT analysis of the mussel aquaculture based on the current vision for national targets of the Greek economy (2012-2020) give to the industry a future direction. The flexible and independent structure of the mussel farming (local natural seed collection, no additional food expenses, flexible labour, mostly locally constructed equipment) as well as the export orientation of the final product gives a competitive advantage in comparison to other aquaculture or primary production Greek industries. Despite that, the sector needs restructuring, mainly to achieve the benefits of the economies of scale. Organizing local production and marketing activities into larger schemes would decrease production costs and add some value to the final product.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodorou, J.A. & Tzovenis, I., 2017. "Managing the Risks of the Greek Crisis in Aquaculture: A SWOT Analysis of the Mediterranean Mussel Farming," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 2), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:330605
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330605/files/18_2_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lozano, Sebastián & Iribarren, Diego & Moreira, María Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2010. "Environmental impact efficiency in mussel cultivation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1269-1277.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao Yang & Hong Fang, 2020. "Research on Green Productivity of Chinese Real Estate Companies—Based on SBM-DEA and TOBIT Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Javier García-Gudiño & Elena Angón & Isabel Blanco-Penedo & Florence Garcia-Launay & José Perea, 2022. "Targeting Environmental and Technical Parameters through Eco-Efficiency Criteria for Iberian Pig Farms in the dehesa Ecosystem," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Iribarren, Diego & Moreira, Maria Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2010. "Life Cycle Assessment of fresh and canned mussel processing and consumption in Galicia (NW Spain)," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 106-117.
    4. Heidari, Mohammad Davoud & Turner, Ian & Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir & Pelletier, Nathan, 2021. "Operations research for environmental assessment of crop-livestock production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Diego Iribarren & Ian Vázquez-Rowe, 2013. "Is Labor a Suitable Input in LCA + DEA Studies? Insights on the Combined Use of Economic, Environmental and Social Parameters," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Ma-Lin Song & Ron Fisher & Jian-Lin Wang & Lian-Biao Cui, 2018. "Environmental performance evaluation with big data: theories and methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 459-472, November.
    7. Yang, Linsheng & Zhou, Yifan & Meng, Bo & Li, Haojie & Zhan, Jian & Xiong, Huaye & Zhao, Huanyu & Cong, Wenfeng & Wang, Xiaozhong & Zhang, Wushuai & Lakshmanan, Prakash & Deng, Yan & Shi, Xiaojun & Ch, 2022. "Reconciling productivity, profitability and sustainability of small-holder sugarcane farms: A combined life cycle and data envelopment analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Iribarren, Diego & Vázquez-Rowe, Ian & Rugani, Benedetto & Benetto, Enrico, 2014. "On the feasibility of using emergy analysis as a source of benchmarking criteria through data envelopment analysis: A case study for wind energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 527-537.
    9. Song, Malin & Zheng, Wanping & Wang, Shuhong, 2017. "Measuring green technology progress in large-scale thermoelectric enterprises based on Malmquist–Luenberger life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 261-269.
    10. Elena Tamburini & Elisa Anna Fano & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Edoardo Turolla, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Oyster Farming in the Po Delta, Northern Italy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Shashank Goyal & Denise Ott & Jens Liebscher & Dennis Höfling & Ariane Müller & Jens Dautz & Herwig O. Gutzeit & Dirk Schmidt & Rosmarie Reuss, 2021. "Sustainability Analysis of Fish Feed Derived from Aquatic Plant and Insect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Iribarren, Diego & Martín-Gamboa, Mario & Dufour, Javier, 2013. "Environmental benchmarking of wind farms according to their operational performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 589-597.
    13. Zhang, Junfeng & Fang, Hong & Wang, Hongxia & Jia, Mingshun & Wu, Junjie & Fang, Siran, 2017. "Energy efficiency of airlines and its influencing factors: A comparison between China and the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-8.
    14. Jianling Fan & Cuiying Liu & Jianan Xie & Lu Han & Chuanhong Zhang & Dengwei Guo & Junzhao Niu & Hao Jin & Brian G. McConkey, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment on Agricultural Production: A Mini Review on Methodology, Application, and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Martín-Gamboa, Mario & Iribarren, Diego & García-Gusano, Diego & Dufour, Javier, 2019. "Enhanced prioritisation of prospective scenarios for power generation in Spain: How and which one?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 369-379.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:330605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etagrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.