IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/jecper/v16y2002i3p197-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retrospectives: The Origins of Neoclassical Microeconomics

Author

Listed:
  • Robert B. Ekelund Jr
  • Robert F. Hébert

Abstract

Until recently, the standard story line in history of thought textbooks was that a triumvirate of British and Continental writers established demarcation between classical economics and neoclassical economics in the early 1870s. The authors raise two objections to this potted history. The first is that the tools of neoclassical economics were invented earlier. Recent work has demonstrated that the tools of neoclassical analysis were widely available across Europe well before 1870. The notion that neoclassical economics experienced a tripartite immaculate conception around 1870 cannot stand. The second objection is that the method of neoclassical economics was invented later. As it stands, the legend undervalues the key contribution of Alfred Marshall, who put an indelible stamp on neoclassical economics by defining the appropriate method of economic inquiry. When we refer to neoclassical economics today, we usually mean the collection of tools of economic knowledge available to (and invented by) Marshall, channeled and directed into uses dictated by Marshall's view of economic science. Yet as we shall see, Marshall had an eminent predecessor in method as well, in the person of Jules Dupuit.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert B. Ekelund Jr & Robert F. Hébert, 2002. "Retrospectives: The Origins of Neoclassical Microeconomics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 197-215, Summer.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:jecper:v:16:y:2002:i:3:p:197-215
    Note: DOI: 10.1257/089533002760278785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/089533002760278785
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claude Ménard, 1980. "Three Forms of Resistance to Statistics: Say, Cournot, Walras," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 524-541, Winter.
    2. Heinz Kurz, 1998. "Friedrich Benedikt Wilhelm Hermann on capital and profits," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 85-119.
    3. Mark Blaug, 1979. "The German hegemony of location theory: a puzzle in the history of economic thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 21-29, Spring.
    4. Reghinos D. Theocharis, 1993. "The Development of Mathematical Economics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-12992-8, December.
    5. K. H. Hennings, 1980. "The Transition From Classical To Neoclassical Economic Theory: Hans Von Mangoldt," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 658-681, November.
    6. Hennings, K H, 1980. "The Transition from Classical to Neoclassical Economic Theory: Hans von Mangoldt," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 658-681.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Poinsot, Philippe, 2016. "Jules Dupuit And The Railroads: What Is The Role Of The State?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 189-209, June.
    2. Galeev, A., 2022. "Proto-marginalist approach in Russia: Yuli Zhukovsky's interpretation of Ricardo," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 55(3), pages 177-191.
    3. Joshua Henkel, 2022. "Economics & Biology: The whole is something besides the parts – a complementary approach to a bioeconomy," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2210, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    4. Yann Giraud & Pedro Garcia Duarte, 2014. "Chasing the B: A Bibliographic Account of Economics’ Relation to its Past, 1991-2011," THEMA Working Papers 2014-09, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    5. Laurent Linnemer, 2022. "Doubling Back on Double Marginalization," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 61(1), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Alexandre Flávio Silva Andrada, 2011. "Uma Breve História Sobre A Abordagem Dedesequilíbrio Na Economia," Anais do XXXVIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 38th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 233, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    7. Mustafa Erdem Ozgur, 2014. "Babbage's Legacy: The Origins of Microeconomics in On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 61(3), pages 322-339, July.
    8. van 't Klooster, Jens & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Marginalism and Scope in the Early Methodenstreit," OSF Preprints aq2bz, Center for Open Science.
    9. Sudipta Basu, 2003. "Discussion of Enforceable Accounting Rules and Income Measurement by Early 20th‐Century Railroads," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 433-444, May.
    10. Ingebrigtsen, Stig & Jakobsen, Ove, 2009. "Moral development of the economic actor," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2777-2784, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas M. Humphrey, 1992. "Marshallian Cross Diagrams and Their Uses Before Alfred Marshall : The Origins of Supply and Demand Geometry," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 78(Mar), pages 3-23.
    2. Ruth Towse, 2013. "Producing pearls of wisdom: a memoir of Mark Blaug's work practice," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 3, pages 14-20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Sandelin, Bo, 2015. "The Pioneers’ Arguments for Formulating Economic Problems Mathematically," Working Papers in Economics 633, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    4. Zoltan J. Acs & Attila Varga, 2008. "Geography, Endogenous Growth, and Innovation," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 12, pages 152-168, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Thomas M. Humphrey, 2010. "Marshallian Cross Diagrams," Chapters, in: Mark Blaug & Peter Lloyd (ed.), Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Arthur Brackmann Netto & Marcelo Milan, 2017. "Transforming the Abstract into Concrete: The Dual Semantic Roots of Economic Modelling," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_22, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    7. Claire Silvant, 2010. "Gustave Fauveau's contribution to fiscal theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 813-835.
    8. da Silva Costa, Jose & Delgado, Ana Paula, 1999. "Regional Science Research in Europe: a review," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa235, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Uskali Mäki & Caterina Marchionni, 2011. "Economics as Usual: Geographical Economics Shaped by Disciplinary Conventions," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Rahman, Jasmeen & Dimand, Robert W., 2021. "The Emergence Of Geographical Economics: At The Contested Boundaries Of Economics, Geography, And Regional Science," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 241-261, June.
    11. Reinert, Erik S. & van de Schootbrugge, Egbert, 1999. "Regionale strategier i kunnskapssamfunnet [Regional strategies in the knowledge-based society]," MPRA Paper 48151, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Vlassis Missos, 2020. "Mathematical Analysis as a Source of Mainstream Economic Ideology," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 72-95, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:jecper:v:16:y:2002:i:3:p:197-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.