IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/ijesnr/v13y2018i2p30-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Human Crocodile Conflicts and the Sustainable Conflict Resolutions Review

Author

Listed:
  • Chakuya Jeremiah

    (Chakuya Jeremiah School of Wildlife, Ecology and Conservation, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Private Bag 7724 Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe)

  • Gondo Reniko

    (Okavango Research Institute, University of Botswana P/Bag 285, Maun, Botswana)

Abstract

The survival of Nile crocodiles in both protected areas and communal areas has been associated with an increasingly uncertainty due to a combination of natural and anthropogenic threats. In this regard sustainable conservation methods are highly recommended in as far as Human and Crocodile Conflicts HCC are concerned. Anthropogenic activities are viewed as potential threat to crocodile survival and some people in turn see crocodiles as dangerous problem animals to their activities. The traditional HCC resolutions have been blamed for increasing attacks on humans and livestock resulting in decreased local support for conservation initiatives hence the need to have satisfactory and effective HCC resolution. The review pointed out that little work has been done on the sustainable management of Nile crocodiles especially for the benefit of those who bear the costs of living with them. The review investigated the main causes of the HCC and identified sustainable conservation strategies which enhance the well-being of humans and Nile crocodile. The paper explores sustainable HCC resolution which can be implemented by Wildlife Managers and communities. The study made several recommendations to conservationist and respective authorities on HCC conflict mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakuya Jeremiah & Gondo Reniko, 2018. "The Human Crocodile Conflicts and the Sustainable Conflict Resolutions Review," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 30-37, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:adp:ijesnr:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:30-37
    DOI: 10.19080/IJESNR.2018.13.555856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/ijesnr/pdf/IJESNR.MS.ID.555856.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/ijesnr/IJESNR.MS.ID.555856.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/IJESNR.2018.13.555856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastien Le Bel & Russell Taylor & Amon Murwira & Billy Mukamuri & Rene Czudek, 2011. "Human Wildlife Conflicts in Southern Africa: Riding the Whirl Wind in Mozambique and in Zimbabwe," Chapters, in: Jordi Lopez-Pujol (ed.), The Importance of Biological Interactions in the Study of Biodiversity, IntechOpen.
    2. Pekka Virtanen, 2005. "Community-based natural resource management in Mozambique: a critical review of the concept's applicability at local level," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Karol Boudreaux & Fred Nelson, 2011. "Community Conservation In Namibia: Empowering The Poor With Property Rights," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 17-24, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Barros, 2012. "Sustainable Tourism in Inhambane-Mozambique," CEsA Working Papers 105, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    2. Steven Gronau & Etti Winter & Ulrike Grote, 2017. "Modelling nature-based tourism impacts on rural development and conservation in Sikunga Conservancy, Namibia," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 276-294, May.
    3. Boycen Kumira Mudzengi & Edson Gandiwa & Never Muboko & Chiedza Ngonidzashe Mutanga, 2021. "Towards sustainable community conservation in tropical savanna ecosystems: a management framework for ecotourism ventures in a changing environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3028-3047, March.
    4. H. Carolyn Peach Brown & James P. Lassoie & Steven A. Wolf, 2007. "An analytic approach to structuring co–management of community forests in Cameroon," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 7(2), pages 135-154, April.
    5. Zakir Husain, 2009. "Commons and commoners: re-examining community in common pool resources," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 142-154.
    6. Andrew Agyare & Grant Murray & Philip Dearden & Rick Rollins, 2015. "Understanding inter-community performance assessments in community-based resource management at Avu Lagoon, Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1493-1508, December.
    7. Calfucura, Enrique, 2018. "Governance, Land and Distribution: A Discussion on the Political Economy of Community-Based Conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 18-26.
    8. Anneli Ekblom & Anna Shoemaker & Lindsey Gillson & Paul Lane & Karl-Johan Lindholm, 2019. "Conservation through Biocultural Heritage—Examples from Sub-Saharan Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Julie A. Silva & Nicole Motzer, 2015. "Hybrid Uptakes of Neoliberal Conservation in Namibian Tourism-based Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(1), pages 48-71, January.
    10. Barakagira Alex & de Wit Anton H., 2019. "The role of wetland management agencies within the local community in the conservation of wetlands in Uganda," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 59-74, March.
    11. Barakagira Alex & de Wit Anton H., 2017. "Community livelihood activities as key determinants for community based conservation of wetlands in Uganda," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 11-24, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    earth and environment journals; environment journals; open access environment journals; peer reviewed environmental journals; open access; juniper publishers; ournal of Environmental Sciences; juniper publishers journals ; juniper publishers reivew;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:ijesnr:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:30-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.