IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ack/journl/y2026id1198.html

Institutionalization of public procurement of innovative products for supporting innovative companies

Author

Listed:
  • Ol'ga S. Belokrylova

  • Kirill A. Belokrylov

  • Anastasija N. Situho

Abstract

 This article provides a theoretical and empirical assessment of the impact of public procurement on the development of domestic innovative entrepreneurship, with a focus on developing a system of measures to further institutionalize state procurement of its products. Given the increasing pressure of sanctions against Russia and the need to ensure technological sovereignty, the search for effective mechanisms to support domestic innovative firms has become particularly urgent. The most important of these, given severe budget constraints, is the institution of public procurement of innovative products. The aim of this study is to develop a research methodology, monitor public procurement of innovative products as a mechanism for supporting innovative firms, identify problem areas, and develop evidence-based recommendations for improving this institution. The paper places particular emphasis on the need to expand government demand for innovative products and develop a system of measures to support innovators in the public procurement market. In addressing these objectives, theoretical and methodological approaches to the interpretation of the concepts of “institutionalization†and “innovative procurement†are systematized. This article provides an in-depth analysis of institutionalization as a process of institutional change based on the introduction of new rules and norms, their adoption, and their transformation into widespread institutional practice. It is shown that a new paradigm of economic development in Russia under sanctions, based on the increased role of innovation, science, and research, objectively determines a stronger role for the state in stimulating the development of innovative firms, in particular by expanding its demand for innovative products through the formal institutionalization of their procurement. An econometric analysis was conducted to identify the influence of public procurement institutions at the level of innovation in national economies. The evolution of the regulatory framework in Russia is characterized, and institutional barriers to the participation of innovative businesses in procurement are identified. An empirical analysis of regional practices is used to assess the effectiveness of the existing institution of reporting by government customers. Based on the study’s results, practical recommendations were developed for the further institutionalization of innovative public procurement, aimed at stimulating state demand for the products of domestic innovative firms and developing an appropriate system of measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ol'ga S. Belokrylova & Kirill A. Belokrylov & Anastasija N. Situho, 2026. "Institutionalization of public procurement of innovative products for supporting innovative companies," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 29(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1198
    DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(2)-45-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1198/674
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(2)-45-63?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Reza Attarpour & Maysam Narimani & Mahdi Elyasi & Akbar Mohammadi, 2024. "Public Procurement Policies to Foster Innovation Development," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 18(1), pages 33-45.
    2. Joel Mokyr, 2005. "The Intellectual Origins of Modern Economic Growth," Springer Books, in: Alberto Quadrio Curzio & Marco Fortis (ed.), Research and Technological Innovation, pages 17-80, Springer.
    3. Aschhoff, Birgit & Sofka, Wolfgang, 2009. "Innovation on demand--Can public procurement drive market success of innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1235-1247, October.
    4. Castellacci, Fulvio, 2008. "Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches," MPRA Paper 27523, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Max Rolfstam, 2009. "Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: The role of institutions," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 349-360, June.
    6. Giovanni Dosi & Keith Pavitt & Luc Soete, 1990. "The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1990.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Fuguo & Yang, Yusen & Guo, Shaobo & Appolloni, Andrea, 2025. "Towards an optimal effect of government technology innovation policy mix: the case of government procurement and research and development subsidies with evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Obwegeser, Nikolaus & Müller, Sune Dueholm, 2018. "Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 1-17.
    3. Guerzoni, Marco & Raiteri, Emilio, 2015. "Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 726-747.
    4. Andrey V. Tkachenko & Andrei A. Yakovlev & Olga A. Demidova & Irina O. Volmenskikh, 2014. "The Effects Of Regulatory Reforms On Public Procurement: The Case Of A National University In Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 19/PA/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Krammer, Sorin M.S., 2017. "Science, technology, and innovation for economic competitiveness: The role of smart specialization in less-developed countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 95-107.
    6. RAITERI Emilio, 2015. "A time to nourish? Evaluating the impact of innovative public procurement on technological generality through patent data," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2015-05, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    7. Raiteri, Emilio, 2018. "A time to nourish? Evaluating the impact of public procurement on technological generality through patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 936-952.
    8. Dosi, Giovanni & Grazzi, Marco & Moschella, Daniele, 2015. "Technology and costs in international competitiveness: From countries and sectors to firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1795-1814.
    9. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Roberto Vivona, 2021. "Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study [Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 379-396.
    10. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Audretsch, David B., 2017. "Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1681-1691.
    11. Krammer, Sorin M.S., 2015. "Science, technology and innovation for economic competitiveness: the role of smart specialization in less-developed countries," MPRA Paper 80203, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Guerzoni, Marco & Raiteri, Emilio, 2012. "Innovative public procurement and R&D Subsidies: hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the technology policy mix in a quasi-experimental setting," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201218, University of Turin.
    13. Kiyoon Shin & Yeongjun Yeo & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2020. "Correction to: Revitalizing the Concept of Public Procurement for Innovation (PPI) from a Systemic Perspective: Objectives, Policy Types, and Impact Mechanisms," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 213-214, April.
    14. Andrey Tkachenko & Daniil Esaulov, 2018. "The Role Of Governors In Public Procurement," HSE Working papers WP BRP 19/PSP/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    15. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 663-684, October.
    16. Francesco Lamperti & Franco Malerba & Roberto Mavilia & Giorgio Tripodi, 2019. "Does the Position in the Inter-sectoral Knowledge Space affect the International Competitiveness of Industries?," LEM Papers Series 2019/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    17. Tas, Bedri Kamil Onur, 2020. "SME Participation in Public Purchasing: Procurement Policy Matters," CEPR Discussion Papers 14836, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    18. Mark Tomlinson, 2000. "Innovation surveys: A researcher's perspective," DRUID Working Papers 00-9, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    19. Viktor Slavtchev & Simon Wiederhold, 2016. "Does the Technological Content of Government Demand Matter for Private R&D? Evidence from US States," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 45-84, April.
    20. Jessica Catalano & Francesco Giffoni & Paolo Castelnovo, 2021. "The impact of space procurement on suppliers: Evidence from Italy," Working Papers 202102, CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.