IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abk/jajeba/ajebasp.2009.41.46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managers Empowering Employees

Author

Listed:
  • J.D. Tony Carter

Abstract

Problem statement: This article looked at the behavior of organizations as an important factor for empowering employees. This allowed for a greater level of partnering between managers and employees. The more that top management wants an internal commitment from its employees, the more it must involve employees in defining work objectives, specifying how to achieve them and setting stretch targets. Develop and improved and practical empowerment model that applies systems theory and socialization theory. Approach: A series of focus group meetings were conducted with managers and employees of 310 companies throughout the United States, Europe and China and were asked questions regarding employee productivity when empowered by management, the importance of increased employee performance, measurement of employee performance, importance of socialized employees in organizations and the role of systemic thinking in management decision making. Results: The findings said that most employees were more productive when empowered by management, almost all firms recognize the importance of increased employee performance and measure it. Last, most firms find socialized employees important to have in their organizations many firms feel that systemic thinking assists managers with decision making. Conclusion: More responsibility generates greater productivity, morale and commitment. Empowerment fosters innovation, creativity, motivation and instills shared values to promote and atmosphere for learning and accomplishment.

Suggested Citation

  • J.D. Tony Carter, 2009. "Managers Empowering Employees," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 1(2), pages 41-46, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2009.41.46
    DOI: 10.3844/ajebasp.2009.41.46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/pdf/ajebasp.2009.41.46.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajebasp.2009.41.46
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3844/ajebasp.2009.41.46?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luce, Mary Frances & Jia, Jianmin & Fischer, Gregory W, 2003. "How Much Do You Like It? Within-Alternative Conflict and Subjective Confidence in Consumer Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 464-472, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenni Sipilä & Anssi Tarkiainen & Sanna Sundqvist, 2018. "Toward an improved conceptual understanding of consumer ambivalence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 147-162, December.
    2. Sipilä, Jenni & Herold, Kristiina & Tarkiainen, Anssi & Sundqvist, Sanna, 2017. "The influence of word-of-mouth on attitudinal ambivalence during the higher education decision-making process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 176-187.
    3. Rong Chen & Jianmin Jia, 2012. "Regret and performance uncertainty in consumer repeat choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 353-365, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2009.41.46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jeffery Daniels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thescipub.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.