IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/zewdok/1101.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bedeutung von Spitzentechnologien, FuE-Intensität und nicht forschungsintensiven Industrien für Innovationen und Innovationsförderung in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Rammer, Christian

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rammer, Christian, 2011. "Bedeutung von Spitzentechnologien, FuE-Intensität und nicht forschungsintensiven Industrien für Innovationen und Innovationsförderung in Deutschland," ZEW Dokumentationen 11-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zewdok:1101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49307/1/666687269.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felder, Johannes & Harhoff, Dietmar & Licht, Georg & Nerlinger, Eric A. & Stahl, Harald, 1994. "Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft: Methodenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 1993," ZEW Dokumentationen 94-06, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Licht, Georg & Schnell, Wolfgang & Stahl, Harald, 1996. "Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 1995," ZEW Dokumentationen 96-05, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Licht, Georg & Stahl, Harald, 1997. "Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 1996," ZEW Dokumentationen 97-07, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Aschhoff, Birgit & Blind, Knut & Ebersberger, Bernd & Fraaß, Benjamin & Rammer, Christian & Schmidt, Tobias, 2007. "Schwerpunktbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2005: Bericht an das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)," ZEW Dokumentationen 07-03, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Felder, Johannes & Harhoff, Dietmar & Licht, Georg & Nerlinger, Eric A. & Stahl, Harald, 1994. "Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft: Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 1993," ZEW Dokumentationen 94-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Gottschalk, Sandra & Janz, Norbert & Peters, Bettina & Rammer, Christian & Schmidt, Tobias, 2002. "Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft: Hintergrundbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2001," ZEW Dokumentationen 02-03, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nils Grashof, 2020. "Firm‐specific cluster effects: A meta‐analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(5), pages 1237-1260, October.
    2. Rammer, Christian & Aschhoff, Birgit & Crass, Dirk & Eckert, Thomas & Licht, Georg & Astor, Michael & Heinrich, Stephan & Riesenberg, Daniel & Woywode, Michael & Strohmeyer, Robert & Tonoyan, Vartuhi , 2011. "Systemevaluierung KMU-innovativ: Begleit- und Wirkungsforschung zur Hightech-Strategie. Abschlussbericht," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 110524.
    3. Effelsberg, Martin, 2011. "Innovations- und Kooperationsaktivitäten in der deutschen Biotechnologie: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie," Arbeitspapiere 120, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    4. Aschhoff, Birgit & Astor, Michael & Crass, Dirk & Eckert, Thomas & Heinrich, Stephan & Licht, Georg & Rammer, Christian & Riesenberg, Daniel & Rüffer, Niclas & Strohmeyer, Robert & Tonoyan, Vartuhi & , 2012. "Systemevaluierung "KMU-innovativ"," ZEW Dokumentationen 12-04, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. EFI - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation (ed.), 2012. "Research, innovation and technological performance in Germany - EFI Report 2012," Reports on Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin, volume 127, number 2012e, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grogro, Ole, 2012. "Global energy trade flows and constraints on conventional and renewable energies: A computable modeling approach," ZEW Dokumentationen 12-02, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Mertens, Matthias & Mueller, Steffen, 2022. "The East-West German gap in revenue productivity:Just a tale of output prices?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 815-831.
    3. Dirk Czarnitzki & Alfred Spielkamp, 2003. "Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Nerlinger, Eric A. & Berger, Georg, 1995. "Technologieorientierte Industrien und Unternehmen: Alternative Definitionen," ZEW Discussion Papers 95-20, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Verworn, Birgit & Lüthje, Christian & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2000. "Innovationsmanagement in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen," Working Papers 7, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    6. Thomas Hempell & Thomas Zwick, 2008. "New Technology, Work Organisation, And Innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 331-354.
    7. Dieter Schumacher & Florian Straßberger, 1994. "Broadening the Scope for Reporting on the Technological Competitiveness of the Federal Republic of Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 100, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Alexandra Schröter, 2008. "Perspektiven der Innovationspolitik in den neuen Bundesländern," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 15(02), pages 40-52, 04.
    9. Schricke, Esther, 2013. "Occurrence of cluster structures in knowledge-intensive services," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R1/2013, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    10. Katharina Kaps & Silko Pfeil & Thomas Sauer & Matthias-Wolfgang Stoetzer, 2011. "Strategic orientation of SME innovation activity in the Jena area," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(09), pages 40-48, May.
    11. Kubitzki, Sabine & Anders, Sven M., 2005. "Branchenspezifische Besonderheiten im Innovationsverhalten des Ernährungsgewerbes: Eine empirische Analyse des Mannheimer Innovationspanels," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 54(02), pages 1-11.
    12. Ganter, Alois & Hecker, Achim, 2013. "Deciphering antecedents of organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 575-584.
    13. Martin Kloyer, 2004. "Opportunismus und Verhandlungsmacht in F&E-Lieferbeziehungen — Eine empirische Untersuchung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 333-364, June.
    14. Michael Reinhard, 2001. "Absorption capacity and the use of external technological knowledge in enterprises," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(04), pages 28-39, January.
    15. Landis, Florian, 2015. "Final report on marginal abatement cost curves for the evaluation of the market stability reserve," ZEW Dokumentationen 15-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Vanberg, Margit A. & Klein, Gordon J., 2008. "Regulatory practice in the European telecommunications sector: Normative justification and practical application," ZEW Dokumentationen 08-02, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Maaß, Frank & Führmann, Bettina, 2012. "Innovationstätigkeit im Mittelstand: Messung und Bewertung," IfM-Materialien 212, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    18. Oskamp, Frank & Snower, Dennis J., 2007. "Interactions between employment and training policies," Kiel Working Papers 1389, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    19. Carl Benedikt Frey & Atif Ansar & Sacha Wunsch-Vincent, 2014. "Defining and measuring the 'Market for Brands': Are emerging economies catching up?," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 21, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    20. Hempell, Thomas & Zwick, Thomas, 2005. "Technology Use, Organisational Flexibility and Innovation: Evidence for Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 05-57, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zewdok:1101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zemande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.