IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/20101.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diagnosen der Moderne: Weber, Habermas, Hayek und Luhmann im Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Dieser Aufsatz vergleicht die Arbeiten von Max Weber, Jürgen Habermas, Friedrich August von Hayek und Niklas Luhmann im Hinblick auf ihre Beiträge zu Diagnosen der Moderne. Eine wichtige Gemeinsamkeit besteht darin, dass alle vier Beiträge zwar modernitätskritisch sind, der gesellschaftlichen Moderne jedoch insgesamt eine positive Bilanz ausstellen. Es wird auch ein wichtiger Unterschied identifiziert: Während sich Weber und Habermas primär mit den Problemen einer systemischen Kolonialisierung der Lebenswelt beschäftigen, befassen sich Hayek und Luhmann primär mit den spiegelbildlichen Problemen und Gefahren einer lebensweltlichen Kolonialisierung des Systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2010. "Diagnosen der Moderne: Weber, Habermas, Hayek und Luhmann im Vergleich," Discussion Papers 2010-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170330/1/dp2010-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2009. "Sozialstruktur und Semantik - Ordonomik als Forschungsprogramm in der modernen (Welt-)Gesellschaft," Discussion Papers 2009-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. North,Douglass C. & Wallis,John Joseph & Weingast,Barry R., 2013. "Violence and Social Orders," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107646995, January.
    3. Gregory Clark, 2007. "Introduction to A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World," Introductory Chapters, in: A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pies, Ingo, 2010. "Moderne Ethik - Ethik der Moderne: Fünf Thesen aus ordonomischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2010-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2012. "Optimierung versus Koordinierung: Zur ordonomischen Klärung des wirtschaftsethischen Problems," Discussion Papers 2012-21, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Replik: eine interdisziplinäre Verständigung ist schwierig, aber möglich und lohnend," Discussion Papers 2017-07, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Individualethik versus Institutionenethik? - Zur Moral (in) der Marktwirtschaft," Discussion Papers 2015-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "F. A. von Hayek und die moralische Qualität des Wettbewerbs," Discussion Papers 2014-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Die zwei Pathologien der Moderne: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze," Discussion Papers 2011-14, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2010. "Wirtschaftliches Wachstum durch politische Konstitutionalisierung: Ein ordonomischer Beitrag zur "conceptual history" der modernen Gesellschaft," Discussion Papers 2010-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Broadberry, Stephen & Wallis, John, 2017. "Growing, Shrinking and Long Run Economic Performance: Historical Perspectives on Economic Development," CEPR Discussion Papers 11973, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Frankema, Ewout & van Waijenburg, Marlous, 2019. "The Great Convergence. Skill Accumulation and Mass Education in Africa and Asia, 1870-2010," CEPR Discussion Papers 14150, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Sambit Bhattacharyya, 2020. "A History of Global Capitalism: Feuding Elites and Imperial Expansion," Working Paper Series 1020, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    5. Charles I. Jones & Paul M. Romer, 2010. "The New Kaldor Facts: Ideas, Institutions, Population, and Human Capital," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 224-245, January.
    6. Yi Wen, 2015. "The Making of an Economic Superpower―Unlocking China’s Secret of Rapid Industrialization," Working Papers 2015-6, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    7. Bakeev, M., 2020. "Institutional and cultural research directions in development economics: Assumptions on agent motivation as a source of disagreement," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 139-156.
    8. Pranab Bardhan, 2016. "State and Development: The Need for a Reappraisal of the Current Literature," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(3), pages 862-892, September.
    9. Grantham, George, 2013. "Reflections on the legacy of Gaidar," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 7-37, February.
    10. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Wachstum durch Wissen: Lektionen der neueren Welt(wirtschafts)geschichte," Discussion Papers 2011-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    11. Ogilvie, Sheilagh & Carus, A.W., 2014. "Institutions and Economic Growth in Historical Perspective," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 8, pages 403-513, Elsevier.
    12. Stephen Broadberry, 2022. "British economic growth and development," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _203, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    13. Sarah Guilland Carmichael & Alexandra de Pleijt & Jan Luiten van Zanden & Tine De Moor, 2015. "Reply to Tracy Dennison and Sheilagh Ogilvie: The European Marriage pattern and the Little Divergence," Working Papers 0070, Utrecht University, Centre for Global Economic History.
    14. Pies, Ingo, 2010. "Moderne Ethik - Ethik der Moderne: Fünf Thesen aus ordonomischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2010-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    15. Pies, Ingo, 2009. "Das ordonomische Forschungsprogramm," Discussion Papers 2009-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    16. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "System und Lebenswelt können sich wechselseitig "kolonisieren"! Eine ordonomische Diagnose der Moderne," Discussion Papers 2011-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    18. Andersson, Krister P. & Smith, Steven M. & Alston, Lee J. & Duchelle, Amy E. & Mwangi, Esther & Larson, Anne M. & de Sassi, Claudio & Sills, Erin O. & Sunderlin, William D. & Wong, Grace Y., 2018. "Wealth and the distribution of benefits from tropical forests: Implications for REDD+," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    19. Clark, Gregory & Cummins, Neil, 2016. "The Child Quality-Quantity Tradeoff, England, 1780-1880: A Fundamental Component of the Economic Theory of Growth is Missing," CEPR Discussion Papers 11232, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Indra de Soysa & Synøve Almås, 2019. "Does Ethnolinguistic Diversity Preclude Good Governance? A Comparative Study with Alternative Data, 1990‐2015," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 604-636, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.