Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Faktor Zufall als Spielverderber: zur Prognostizierbarkeit von Fußballergebnissen – Wettmärkte als effizienter Informationslieferant

Contents:

Author Info

  • Quitzau, Jörn
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Der kommerzielle Erfolg eines professionellen Fußballspiels hängt wesentlich vom erwarteten Spannungsgrad ab. Je weniger der Spielausgang prognostizierbar ist, desto größer ist das Zuschauerinteresse. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird deshalb die quantitative Bedeutung des Erfolgsfaktors Zufall im Profifußball untersucht. Die Quantifizierung erfolgt mit Hilfe von Wettquoten und basiert auf der Annahme, dass Wettmärkte informationseffizient sind. Es zeigt sich, dass in den beiden untersuchten Ligen (Deutsche Bundesliga, Spanische Primera Division) mehr als die Hälfte der Spiele entscheidend vom Zufall beeinflusst werden. Zufall scheint damit – zumindest kurzfristig – eine noch bedeutsamere Erfolgsdeterminante als die Finanzkraft der Vereine zu sein. Daraus resultieren nicht zu unterschätzende Implikationen: Für das Management eines Vereins heißt dies, dass die (sportliche) Grenzproduktivität von Spielerkäufen im Durchschnitt geringer ist, als allgemein angenommen. Zudem sind Trainerwechsel offenbar seltener angezeigt, als es im Bundesliga-Alltag gängige Praxis ist. Für die Liga bedeutet der hohe Einfluss des Faktors Zufall, dass im Vergleich zu anderen Teamsportarten weniger institutionelle – Wettbewerbsbeschränkende – Regelungen zum Erhalt der Liga-Stabilität nötig sind. Wettbewerbspolitisch bedeutet das, dass eine zentrale, monopolistische Vermarktung mit weitreichender Erlös-Umverteilung abgeschafft werden könnte, ohne dass die Liga Schaden nehmen muss. Die Spanische Primera Division kann hier als Vorbild gelten. Die Folgen des Schiedsrichter-Wettskandals könnten den Zufallseinfluss künftig abschwächen, wenn nämlich Maßnahmen wie z.B. ein Videobeweis eingeführt würden. Die Zahl der Zufallsmomente, die u.a. den Reiz eines Fußballspiels ausmachen, könnte dadurch reduziert werden. --

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/21880/1/PROD0000000000185072.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Deutsche Bank Research in its series Research Notes with number 18.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 2005
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:dbrrns:18

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Deutsche Bank AG, 60272 Frankfurt am Main
    Phone: +49 69 910-31831
    Fax: +49 69 910 31877
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.dbresearch.de/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    2. Roger C. Vergin & Michael Scriabin, 1978. "Winning Strategies for Wagering on National Football League Games," Management Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 24(8), pages 809-818, April.
    3. Snyder, Wayne W, 1978. "Horse Racing: Testing the Efficient Markets Model," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 33(4), pages 1109-18, September.
    4. Sauer, Raymond D, et al, 1988. "Hold Your Bets: Another Look at the Efficiency of the Gambling Market for National Football League Games: Comment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(1), pages 206-13, February.
    5. Woodland, Linda M & Woodland, Bill M, 1994. " Market Efficiency and the Favorite-Longshot Bias: The Baseball Betting Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 269-79, March.
    6. Whitney, James D, 1988. "Winning Games versus Winning Championships: The Economics of Fan Interest and Team Performance," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, Western Economic Association International, vol. 26(4), pages 703-24, October.
    7. Zuber, Richard A & Gandar, John M & Bowers, Benny D, 1985. "Beating the Spread: Testing the Efficiency of the Gambling Market for National Football League Games," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(4), pages 800-806, August.
    8. Camerer, Colin F, 1989. "Does the Basketball Market Believe in the 'Hot Hand'?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 1257-61, December.
    9. Sanford J Grossman & Joseph E Stiglitz, 1997. "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," Levine's Working Paper Archive 1908, David K. Levine.
    10. Peter J. Sloane, 2000. "The Regulation of Professional Team Sports," IASE Conference Papers, International Association of Sports Economists 0003, International Association of Sports Economists.
    11. Jaffe, Jeffrey F, 1974. "Special Information and Insider Trading," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(3), pages 410-28, July.
    12. Thaler, Richard H & Ziemba, William T, 1988. "Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 161-74, Spring.
    13. Figlewski, Stephen, 1979. "Subjective Information and Market Efficiency in a Betting Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(1), pages 75-88, February.
    14. Georg Stadtmann & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2002. "Uncertainty of outcome versus reputation: Empirical evidence for the First German Football Division," Empirical Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 101-112.
    15. Ali, Mukhtar M, 1979. "Some Evidence of the Efficiency of a Speculative Market," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 387-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Quitzau, Jörn & Vöpel, Henning, 2009. "Der Faktor Zufall im Fußball: Eine empirische Untersuchung für die Saison 2007/08," HWWI Research Papers 1-22, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:dbrrns:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.