Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Prospect-Theory, Mental Accounting and Differences in Aggregated and Segregated Evaluation of Lottery Portfolios

Contents:

Author Info

  • Langer, Thomas

    ()
    (Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster Lehrstuhl für BWL, insbesondere Finanzierung)

  • Weber, Martin

    ()
    (Lehrstuhl für ABWL, Finanzwirtschaft, insb. Bankbetriebslehre)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    If individuals have to evaluate a portfolio (or sequence) of lotteries their judgment is influenced by the portfolio presentation mode. Experimental studies (Redelmeier and Tversky, 1992, Benartzi and Thaler, 1998) found significantly higher acceptance rates for a sequence of lotteries, if the overall distribution was displayed instead of the set of lotteries itself. The literature provides an easy and intuitive explanation for this phenomenon based on mental accounting and loss aversion. It predicts the experimental findings to translate to all kinds of lottery types and portfolio sizes. In this paper we offer an explanation, which incorporates further evaluation concepts of Prospect Theory. Our formal analysis of the difference in aggregated and segregated portfolio evaluation demonstrates that the higher attractiveness of the aggregated presentation mode is not a general phenomenon, but depends on specific parameters of the lotteries. The theoretical findings are supported by an experimental study. In contrast to the existing evidence and in line with our theoretical results we find for specific types of lotteries an even lower acceptance rate, if the overall distribution is displayed.

    Download Info

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim & Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim in its series Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications with number 99-64.

    as in new window
    Length: 28 pages
    Date of creation: 21 Jun 1999
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-64

    Note: Financial Support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: D-68131 Mannheim
    Phone: (49) (0) 621-292-2547
    Fax: (49) (0) 621-292-5594
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/
    More information through EDIRC

    Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de

    Order Information:
    Email:

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carsten Schmidt).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.