Existing equilibrium concepts for games make use of the subjective expected utility model axiomatized by Savage (1954) to represent players' preferences. Accordingly, each player's beliefs about the strategies played by opponents are represented by a probability measure. Motivated by experimental findings such as the Ellsberg Paradox demonstrating that the beliefs of a decision maker may not be representable by a probability measure, this paper generalizes equilibrium concepts for normal form games to allow for the beliefs of each player to be representable by a closed and convex set of probability measures. The implications of this generalization for the strategy choices and welfare of players are studied.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Toronto, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
ecpap-95-02.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey & Burkhard C. Schipper, 2005.
"Ambiguity and Social Interaction,"
Discussion Papers
59, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Eichberger, Jurgen & Kelsey, Davis & Schipper, Burkhard, 2007.
"Ambiguity and Social Interaction,"
Working Papers
05-36, University of California at Davis, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey & Burkhard C. Schipper, 2007.
"Ambiguity and Social Interaction,"
Working Papers
0443, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics, revised May 2007.
[Downloadable!]
Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey, 2004.
"Sequential Two-Player Games With Ambiguity,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 45(4), pages 1229-1261, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Jürgen Eichberger & David Kelsey, 2007.
"Ambiguity,"
Working Papers
0448, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2007.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Eichberger, Jürgen & Kelsey, David, 2007.
"Ambiguity,"
Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications
07-50, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim & Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
[Downloadable!]