The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is one of the most investigated questions in Finance. Nevertheless, it is still a puzzle, despite the enormous amount of research it has provoked. For instance, it is still discussed that market cannot be outperformed in the long run (Detry and Gregoire, 2001), persistent market anomalies cannot be easily explained in this theoretical framework (Shiller, 2003) and some talented hedge-fund managers keep earning excess risk-adjusted rates of returns regularly. We concentrate in this paper on the weak form of efficiency(Fama, 1970). We focus on the efficacity of simple technical trading rules, following a large research stream presented in Park and Irwin (2004). Nevertheless, we depart from previous works in many ways : we first have a large population of technical investment rules (more than 260.000) exploiting real-world data to manage a financial portfolio. Very few researches have used such a large amount of calculus to examine the EMH. Our experimental design allows for strategy selection based on past absolute performance. We take into account the data-snooping risk, which is an unavoidable problem in such broad-spectrum researches, using a rigorous Bootstrap Reality Check procedure. While market inefficiencies, after including transaction costs, cannot clearly be successfully exploited, our experiments present troubling outcomes inviting close re-consideration of the weak-form EMH.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: