This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Are fair trade labels good business ? Ethics and coffee buying intentions

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
P. DE PELSMACKER
L. DRIESEN
G. RAYP ()

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

On the basis of a sample of 808 Belgian citizens and using conjoint analysis, the importance of a ‘fair trade’ label for the coffee buying decision is studied, as well as the willingness-to-pay for such a label. Furthermore, the size of the consumer segment willing to buy ‘fair trade’ coffee and their characteristics are studied. On average, a fair trade label is considered to be the second most important coffee attribute, together with flavor, and almost as important as the brand. Ten percent of the sample is willing to pay at least the actual price premium for fair trade coffee (27%). On the basis of the relative importance they attach to various coffee attributes, coffee buyers can be divided into four segments: fair trade lovers (11%), fair trade likers (40%), flavor lovers (24%) and brand lovers (25%). A number of demographic characteristics are measured, as well as the personal values of the respondents (Rokeach). Five basic dimensions of personal values can be distinguished: civic spirit, competence, sincere and social, idealistic, and personal gratification. Fair trade lovers are relatively highly educated, and the 31-44 years age group is over represented. They score higher than the other segments on personal values such as idealism, but lower on the dimension ‘civic spirit’. The characteristics of fair trade likers are not significantly different from the average in the sample, except for their higher degree of idealism.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.FEB.UGent.be/fac/research/WP/Papers/wp_03_165.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration in its series Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium with number 03/165.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 27 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:03/165

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Hoveniersberg 4, B-9000 Gent
Phone: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 34 61
Fax: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 35 92
Web page: http://www.feb.ugent.be/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe).

Related research
Keywords: fair trade coffee buying behavior ethical production ethical consumption personal values conjoint analysis

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Green, Paul E & Srinivasan, V, 1978. " Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook," Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(2), pages 103-23, Se.
  2. Crosby, Lawrence A. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Gill, James D., 1990. "Organizational structure of values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 123-134, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Roberts, James A., 1996. "Will the real socially responsible consumer please step forward?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 79-83. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. I. Vermeir & W. Verbeke, 2004. "Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring The Consumer Attitude – Behaviour Gap," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/268, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
  2. Jean-Marie Codron & Lucie Sirieix & Thomas Reardon, 2005. "Social and Environmental Attributes of Food Products in an Emerging Mass Market : Challenges of Signaling and Consumer Perception, With European Illustrations," Industrial Organization 0512002, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
  3. Julian Rode & Robin Hogarth & Marc Le Menestrel, 2004. "Ethical Differentiation and Market Behavior: An Experimental Approach," Economics Working Papers 779, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised May 2006. [Downloadable!]
  4. I. Vermeir & W. Verbeke, 2005. "Sustainable food consumption, involvement, certainty and values: an application of the theory of Planned Behaviour," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/352, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
  5. D. Van Den Poel, 2003. "Predicting Mail-Order Repeat Buying: Which Variables Matter?," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 03/191, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-10.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.