This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Estimation of Unit Values in Cross Sections without Quantity Information and Implications for Demand and Welfare Analysis

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Vincenzo Atella () (University of Rome II - Faculty of Economics)
Martina Menon (University of Verona - Economic Sciences)
Federico Perali () (University of Verona - Economic Sciences and University of Verona - Department of Economics)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Household surveys frequently record only expenditure information. The lack of information about quantities purchased precludes the possibility of deriving household specific unit values. The aggregate price indexes derived from sources exogenous to the household survey are often not sufficient to identify all parameters and to provide plausible estimates. We use a theoretical result developed by Lewbel (1989) to construct "pseudo" unit values by 1) reproducing the variability of crosssectional price variation using the variability of the budget shares, and 2) adding the variability to the aggregate price indexes published by the national statistical institute. The study estimates a complete quadratic demand system using a time series of cross-sections of Italian household budgets including, in turn, aggregate price indexes and "pseudo" unit values. The results show that the matrix of compensated price elasticities is negative semidefinite only if "pseudo" unit values are used. In order to have a counterfactual experiment, we then consider a household survey with actual unit values and compare them with "pseudo" unit values. The experiment shows that in most cases "pseudo" values maintain the relevant characteristics of the distribution of actual unit values. Overall, we conclude that "pseudo" unit values are better than aggregate price indexes for sound demand and welfare analysis.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://www.ceistorvergata.it/repec/rpaper/No-12-Atella,Menon,Perali.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tor Vergata University, CEIS in its series CEIS Research Paper with number 12.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 18 Apr 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:12

Contact details of provider:
Postal: CEIS - Centre for Economic and International Studies - Faculty of Economics - University of Rome "Tor Vergata" - Via Columbia, 2 00133 Roma
Phone: +39062040234
Fax: +39062020687
Email:
Web page: http://www.ceistorvergata.it
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Postal: CEIS - Centre for Economic and International Studies - Faculty of Economics - University of Rome "Tor Vergata" - Via Columbia, 2 00133 Roma
Email:
Web: http://www.ceistorvergata.it

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Marcello Di Biagio).

Related research
Keywords: Unit values; Cross-section prices; demand analysis; Slutsky matrix properties;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation
D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Deaton, Angus, 1987. "Estimation of own- and cross-price elasticities from household survey data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-2), pages 7-30. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Lewbel, Arthur, 1989. "Identification and Estimation of Equivalence Scales under Weak Separability," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(2), pages 311-16, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Lahatte, Agenor & Miquel, Ruth & Laisney, Francois & Preston, Ian, 1998. "Demand systems with unit values:: A comparison of two specifications," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 281-290, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Coondoo, D. & Majumder, A. & Ray, E,, 2001. "On the Method of Calculating Regional Prices Differentials with Illustrative Evidence from India," Papers 2001-09, Tasmania - Department of Economics.
  5. D. Coondoo & A. Majumder & R. Ray, 2001. "On a Method of Calculating Regional Price Differentials with Illustrative Evidence from India," ASARC Working Papers 2001-06, Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre. [Downloadable!]
  6. BLACKORBY, Charles & BOSSERT, Walter, 2004. "Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being," Cahiers de recherche 2004-06, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. John K. Dagsvik and Leif Brubakk, 1998. "Price Indexes for Elementary Aggregates Derived from Behavioral Assumptions," Discussion Papers 234, Research Department of Statistics Norway. [Downloadable!]
  8. Blackorby, C. & Donaldson, D., 1989. "Adult-Equivalence Scales, Interpersonal Comparison Of Well-Being, And Applied Welfare Economics," UBC Departmental Archives 89-24, UBC Department of Economics.
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Vincenzo Atella & J. Coggins & Federico Perali, 2002. "Aversion to inequality in Italy and its determinants," CHILD Working Papers wp03_03, CHILD - Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic economics - ITALY. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Vittorio Nicolardi, 2009. "The effects of the new 1995 ESA methodologies of estimation on the structural analysis of Italian consumption," Statistical Methods and Applications, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 125-149, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS is not the only service displaying RePEc data. Choose on RePEc which service fits your needs best.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-5.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.