This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Securitization in East Asia

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Lejot , Paul (Asian Institute of International Financial Law)
Arner, Douglas () (Asian Institute of International Financial Law)
Schou-Zibell, Lotte () (Asian Development Bank)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Securitization offers a range of benefits for Asia’s financial systems and economies as a mechanism to assist funding and investment. As a form of structured finance, reliable and efficient securitization can assist development by enabling financial systems to deepen and strengthen—thus contributing to overall economic growth and stability. It must be recognized, however, that there are both overt and more subtle risks in certain uses of securitization. The credit and liquidity crisis that began in the United States and spread to other developed financial systems in mid-2007 exposed the danger associated with securitization: excessive risk-taking or regulatory capital arbitrage rather than a tool to assist more conventional or conservative approaches to funding, risk management, or investment. Securitization has also been criticized for rendering financial markets opaque, while contributing to a growing emphasis in the global economy of credit intermediation conducted in capital markets rather than through banks. This study examines the institutional basis of these concerns by investigating the use of securitization in East Asia, questioning both the growth in regional activity since the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis, and the reasons for it remaining constrained. The paper concludes with a discussion of proposals to support proper development of securitization in the region, including institutional mechanisms that could better allow securitization to enhance development and financial stability. If East Asia begins to make fuller use of securitization, its motive will be to meet funding or investment needs in the real economy rather than balance sheet arbitrage of the kind that peaked elsewhere in 2007.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://aric.adb.org/pdf/workingpaper/WP12_Securitization_in_East_Asia.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Asian Development Bank in its series Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration with number 12.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 73 pages
Date of creation: 01 Jan 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ris:adbrei:0012

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.adb.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ivan B. de Leon).

Related research
Keywords: Securitization; East Asia; debt markets; risk transfer;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was sponsored from 1997 to 2002 by the Université du Québec à Montréal.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-1.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.