IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/98892.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing the existence of moments for GARCH processes

Author

Listed:
  • Francq, Christian
  • Zakoian, Jean-Michel

Abstract

It is generally admitted that many financial time series have heavy tailed marginal distributions. When time series models are fitted on such data, the non-existence of appropriate moments may invalidate standard statistical tools used for inference. Moreover, the existence of moments can be crucial for risk management, for instance when risk is measured through the expected shortfall. This paper considers testing the existence of moments in the framework of GARCH processes. While the second-order stationarity condition does not depend on the distribution of the innovation, higher-order moment conditions involve moments of the independent innovation process. We propose tests for the existence of high moments of the returns process which are based on the joint asymptotic distribution of the Quasi-Maximum Likelihood (QML) estimator of the volatility parameters and empirical moments of the residuals. A bootstrap procedure is proposed to improve the finite-sample performance of our test. To achieve efficiency gains we consider non Gaussian QML estimators founded on reparametrizations of the GARCH model, and we discuss optimality issues. Monte-Carlo experiments and an empirical study illustrate the asymptotic results.

Suggested Citation

  • Francq, Christian & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2019. "Testing the existence of moments for GARCH processes," MPRA Paper 98892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:98892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/98892/1/MPRA_paper_98892.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Hans Franses & Dick Dijk, 2011. "GARCH, Outliers, and Forecasting Volatility," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Greg N. Gregoriou & Razvan Pascalau (ed.), Nonlinear Financial Econometrics: Forecasting Models, Computational and Bayesian Models, chapter 8, pages 136-159, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Alexander Heinemann, 2019. "A Bootstrap Test for the Existence of Moments for GARCH Processes," Papers 1902.01808, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    3. Drost, Feike C. & Klaassen, Chris A. J., 1997. "Efficient estimation in semiparametric GARCH models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 193-221, November.
    4. White,Halbert, 1996. "Estimation, Inference and Specification Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521574464.
    5. Jensen, Søren Tolver & Rahbek, Anders, 2004. "Asymptotic Inference For Nonstationary Garch," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 1203-1226, December.
    6. Phillip Kearns & Adrian Pagan, 1997. "Estimating The Density Tail Index For Financial Time Series," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(2), pages 171-175, May.
    7. Jondeau, Eric & Rockinger, Michael, 2003. "Testing for differences in the tails of stock-market returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 559-581, December.
    8. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    9. Drost, F.C. & Klaassen, C.A.J. & Werker, B.J.M., 1994. "Adaptive estimation in time-series models," Discussion Paper 1994-88, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Christian Francq & Jean-Michel Zakoïan, 2013. "Optimal predictions of powers of conditionally heteroscedastic processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(2), pages 345-367, March.
    11. Eric Beutner & Alexander Heinemann & Stephan Smeekes, 2018. "A Residual Bootstrap for Conditional Value-at-Risk," Papers 1808.09125, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    12. Li, Dong & Zhang, Xingfa & Zhu, Ke & Ling, Shiqing, 2018. "The ZD-GARCH model: A new way to study heteroscedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 1-17.
    13. Francq, Christian & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2013. "Inference in non stationary asymmetric garch models," MPRA Paper 44901, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Francq, C. & Jiménez-Gamero, M.D. & Meintanis, S.G., 2017. "Tests for conditional ellipticity in multivariate GARCH models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 305-319.
    15. He, Changli & Terasvirta, Timo, 1999. "Properties of moments of a family of GARCH processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 173-192, September.
    16. Cavaliere, Giuseppe & Nielsen, Heino Bohn & Pedersen, Rasmus Søndergaard & Rahbek, Anders, 2022. "Bootstrap inference on the boundary of the parameter space, with application to conditional volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 241-263.
    17. Ling, Shiqing & McAleer, Michael, 2002. "Stationarity and the existence of moments of a family of GARCH processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 109-117, January.
    18. Shinichi Sakata & Halbert White, 1998. "High Breakdown Point Conditional Dispersion Estimation with Application to S&P 500 Daily Returns Volatility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 529-568, May.
    19. Dimitris N. Politis, 0. "Model-free versus Model-based Volatility Prediction," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 358-359.
    20. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    21. Trapani, Lorenzo, 2016. "Testing for (in)finite moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 57-68.
    22. Wagner, Niklas & Marsh, Terry A., 2003. "Measuring Tail Thickness under GARCH and an Application to Extremal Exchange Rate Changes," Research Program in Finance, Working Paper Series qt7pb301tr, Research Program in Finance, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    23. Søren Tolver Jensen & Anders Rahbek, 2004. "Asymptotic Normality of the QMLE Estimator of ARCH in the Nonstationary Case," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 641-646, March.
    24. Anne Leucht & Jens-Peter Kreiss & Michael H. Neumann, 2015. "A Model Specification Test For GARCH(1,1) Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1167-1193, December.
    25. Franses, Philip Hans & Ghijsels, Hendrik, 1999. "Additive outliers, GARCH and forecasting volatility," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, February.
    26. Bougerol, Philippe & Picard, Nico, 1992. "Stationarity of Garch processes and of some nonnegative time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1-2), pages 115-127.
    27. Pedersen, Rasmus Søndergaard & Rahbek, Anders, 2016. "Nonstationary GARCH with t-distributed innovations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 19-21.
    28. Yogesh Dwivedi & Suhasini Subba Rao, 2011. "A test for second‐order stationarity of a time series based on the discrete Fourier transform," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 68-91, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carnero, M. Angeles & León, Angel & Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel, 2023. "Skewness in energy returns: estimation, testing and retain-->implications for tail risk," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 178-189.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Dong & Zhang, Xingfa & Zhu, Ke & Ling, Shiqing, 2018. "The ZD-GARCH model: A new way to study heteroscedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 1-17.
    2. Wang, Guochang & Zhu, Ke & Li, Guodong & Li, Wai Keung, 2022. "Hybrid quantile estimation for asymmetric power GARCH models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 264-284.
    3. Guochang Wang & Ke Zhu & Guodong Li & Wai Keung Li, 2019. "Hybrid quantile estimation for asymmetric power GARCH models," Papers 1911.09343, arXiv.org.
    4. Li, Dong & Li, Muyi & Wu, Wuqing, 2014. "On dynamics of volatilities in nonstationary GARCH models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 86-90.
    5. W. K. Li & Shiqing Ling & Michael McAleer, 2001. "A Survey of Recent Theoretical Results for Time Series Models with GARCH Errors," ISER Discussion Paper 0545, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    6. Li, Dong & Ling, Shiqing & Zhu, Ke, 2016. "ZD-GARCH model: a new way to study heteroscedasticity," MPRA Paper 68621, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani, 2019. "Risk Measurement," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02119256, HAL.
    8. Harvey,Andrew C., 2013. "Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107630024.
    9. Francq, Christian & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2021. "Testing the existence of moments and estimating the tail index of augmented garch processes," MPRA Paper 110511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Francq, Christian & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2013. "Inference in non stationary asymmetric garch models," MPRA Paper 44901, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Yining Chen, 2015. "Semiparametric Time Series Models with Log-concave Innovations: Maximum Likelihood Estimation and its Consistency," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-31, March.
    12. Hill, Jonathan B. & Prokhorov, Artem, 2016. "GEL estimation for heavy-tailed GARCH models with robust empirical likelihood inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 18-45.
    13. Zhu, Ke & Li, Wai Keung, 2013. "A new Pearson-type QMLE for conditionally heteroskedastic models," MPRA Paper 52344, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Felix Chan & Michael McAleer, 2002. "Maximum likelihood estimation of STAR and STAR-GARCH models: theory and Monte Carlo evidence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 509-534.
    15. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier, 2014. "Volatility persistence in crude oil markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 729-742.
    16. Francq, Christian & Zakoïan, Jean-Michel, 2009. "Testing the Nullity of GARCH Coefficients: Correction of the Standard Tests and Relative Efficiency Comparisons," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(485), pages 313-324.
    17. Christian Francq & Jean-Michel Zakoïan, 2006. "Inference in GARCH when some coefficients are equal to zero," Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 64, Society for Computational Economics.
    18. McAleer, Michael & Chan, Felix & Marinova, Dora, 2007. "An econometric analysis of asymmetric volatility: Theory and application to patents," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 259-284, August.
    19. Guo, Shaojun & Li, Dong & Li, Muyi, 2019. "Strict stationarity testing and GLAD estimation of double autoregressive models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 319-337.
    20. Wang, Hui & Pan, Jiazhu, 2014. "Normal mixture quasi maximum likelihood estimation for non-stationary TGARCH(1,1) models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 117-123.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Conditional heteroskedasticity; Efficiency comparisons; Non-Gaussian QMLE; Residual Bootstrap; Stationarity tests;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:98892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.