Is urban space, as a concentric agglomeration in expansion, in contraction, which duplicates itself, the solution of a dierential system ? Does urban geometry come from "chaotic" mutations, from cloning and aggregating districts ? And do they project their metrics on space ? Then where does its finality come from ? Is it central, peripherical, as it were interlocked ? Functional and territorial logics demand a new regulation : Decentralized planning. However, is this space collectively rooted in local mentalities, even if Public Economics are used as a means to achieve this purpose ? Thus, with a finality and a geometry, through all its modalities, this space becomes the theorical entity of a possible General theory.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number
3774.
Find related papers by JEL classification: B00 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General - - - General O18 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General