The paper assesses the welfare effects of different ways of allocating input price risk between a regulated utility, consumers and speculators in a futures market. A risk-averse utility setting a fixed retail price requires a price that exceeds expected marginal cost, unless an efficient futures market is available. The firm bears no risk when input price risk is transferred to consumers, but consumers may not like price risk. When a futures market is available to consumers marginal cost pricing is always preferable to a fixed retail price. The policy conclusion is that marginal cost pricing should be combined with the development of futures markets in which consumers can hedge.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Oxford, Department of Economics in its series Economics Series Working Papers with number
100.