IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/net/wpaper/1911.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Incumbents Beat Disruptors? Evidence from Hotels’ Responses to Home-sharing Rivals

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Chen

    (Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721)

  • Karen Xie

    (Daniels College of Business, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, 80208)

  • Jianwei Liu

    (School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 150001)

  • Yong Liu

    (Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721)

Abstract

Growing research attention is paid to the disruption of sharing economy services (Airbnb, Uber, Lending Club, etc.) and how they cut into incumbent firms’ profit. Yet, the literature is silent on how incumbents respond to the rivalry and what are the performance outcomes if taking a defensive stance. In this paper, we investigate incumbent hotels’ responses to home sharing and how different reactions among hotels lead to distinct outcomes in customer satisfaction. Integrating casual inference and machine learning, we analyze large-scale, multidimensional data on hotels and home-sharing services in Beijing from March, 2015 to December, 2017 and three findings are gleaned. First, we find heterogeneous reactions of hotels, with their management responses to online guest reviews (reviews, hereafter) surging at higher-priced hotels while plunging at lower-priced ones compared with hotels that do not experience home sharing’s entry. The distinct response strategy (active vs passive) is likely due to different extent of decline in sales at these two types of hotels after home sharing’s entry. Second, hotels that are responsive to reviews experience a significant rise in customer satisfaction while the less responsive hotels do not. We show that this difference can be attributed to distinct response strategies of hotels and not their price segment (higher-priced or lower-priced). Third, utilizing state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms combined with topic modeling, we identify the theme-specific content features (topics and their sentiments) in reviews on both hotels and home sharing. Hotels that are responsive to reviews improve significantly on sentiments of two out of seven topics (i.e., cleanliness and service), which explains their performance gains when facing the disruption. And these two topics are the exact areas where home sharing outperforms hotels based on the review comparison. These suggest that responding to reviews allows hotel managers to not only bridge the gap between their property and home-sharing rivals but also differentiate from hotels less responsive - an interesting segmentation in the market when disruptors enter the game. This study makes the first attempt to investigate incumbent firms acting to sharing economy disruptors. Implications are made on how different types of hotels can and should react for improved performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Chen & Karen Xie & Jianwei Liu & Yong Liu, 2019. "How Incumbents Beat Disruptors? Evidence from Hotels’ Responses to Home-sharing Rivals," Working Papers 19-11, NET Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:1911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.netinst.org/Xie_19-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Wager & Susan Athey, 2018. "Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1228-1242, July.
    2. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    3. Clewlow, Regina R. & Mishra, Gouri S., 2017. "Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt82w2z91j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Davide Proserpio & Georgios Zervas, 2017. "Online Reputation Management: Estimating the Impact of Management Responses on Consumer Reviews," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 645-665, September.
    5. Hui Li & Kannan Srinivasan, 2019. "Competitive Dynamics in the Sharing Economy: An Analysis in the Context of Airbnb and Hotels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 365-391, May.
    6. Chiara Farronato & Andrey Fradkin, 2018. "The Welfare Effects of Peer Entry in the Accommodation Market: The Case of Airbnb," NBER Working Papers 24361, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Dinesh Puranam & Vishal Narayan & Vrinda Kadiyali, 2017. "The Effect of Calorie Posting Regulation on Consumer Opinion: A Flexible Latent Dirichlet Allocation Model with Informative Priors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 726-746, September.
    8. Judith A. Chevalier & Yaniv Dover & Dina MayzlinDina Mayzlin, 2018. "Channels of Impact: User Reviews When Quality Is Dynamic and Managers Respond," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 688-709, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Li & Yijin Kim & Kannan Srinivasan, 2022. "Market Shifts in the Sharing Economy: The Impact of Airbnb on Housing Rentals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8015-8044, November.
    2. Hülya Karaman, 2021. "Online Review Solicitations Reduce Extremity Bias in Online Review Distributions and Increase Their Representativeness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4420-4445, July.
    3. Uttara Ananthakrishnan & Davide Proserpio & Siddhartha Sharma, 2023. "I Hear You: Does Quality Improve with Customer Voice?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1143-1161, November.
    4. Carlson, Keith & Kopalle, Praveen K. & Riddell, Allen & Rockmore, Daniel & Vana, Prasad, 2023. "Complementing human effort in online reviews: A deep learning approach to automatic content generation and review synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 54-74.
    5. Erfan Rezvani & Christian Rojas, 2022. "Firm responsiveness to consumers' reviews: The effect on online reputation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 898-922, November.
    6. Ao Shen & Peng Wang & Yongyuan Ma, 2022. "When crowding‐in and when crowding‐out? The boundary conditions on the relationship between negative online reviews and online sales," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2016-2032, September.
    7. Sheng, Jie, 2019. "Being Active in Online Communications: Firm Responsiveness and Customer Engagement Behaviour," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 40-51.
    8. Radostina Prodanova, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of the Online Reputation of Class A and Class B Accommodation in Burgas," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 11(1), pages 120-129, April.
    9. Ho, Shirley J. & Chang, Hung-Wei, 2022. "Impacts of sharing business on production, sales, and rental markets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Kyle Barron & Edward Kung & Davide Proserpio, 2021. "The Effect of Home-Sharing on House Prices and Rents: Evidence from Airbnb," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 23-47, January.
    11. Steven F. Lehrer & Tian Xie, 2022. "The Bigger Picture: Combining Econometrics with Analytics Improves Forecasts of Movie Success," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 189-210, January.
    12. Zhao, Yan & Wen, Lingling & Feng, Xiangnan & Li, Ran & Lin, Xiaolin, 2020. "How managerial responses to online reviews affect customer satisfaction: An empirical study based on additional reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Blumenberg, Evelyn & Paul, Julene & Pierce, Gregory, 2021. "Travel in the digital age: Vehicle ownership and technology-facilitated accessibility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 86-94.
    14. Dai Yao & Chuang Tang & Junhong Chu, 2023. "A Dynamic Model of Owner Acceptance in Peer-to-Peer Sharing Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 166-188, January.
    15. Wei Chen & Zaiyan Wei & Karen Xie, 2022. "The Battle for Homes: How Does Home Sharing Disrupt Local Residential Markets?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8589-8612, December.
    16. Mingwen Yang & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & Vijay Mookerjee, 2019. "Prescribing Response Strategies to Manage Customer Opinions: A Stochastic Differential Equation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 351-374, June.
    17. Barreto, Yuri & Silveira Neto, Raul da Mota & Carazza, Luis, 2021. "Uber and traffic safety: Evidence from Brazilian cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    18. Xinxin Guo & Juho Pesonen & Raija Komppula, 2021. "Comparing online travel review platforms as destination image information agents," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 159-187, June.
    19. Wang, Sicheng & Smart, Michael, 2020. "The disruptive effect of ridesourcing services on for-hire vehicle drivers’ income and employment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 13-23.
    20. Aguilera-García, Álvaro & Gomez, Juan & Velázquez, Guillermo & Vassallo, Jose Manuel, 2022. "Ridesourcing vs. traditional taxi services: Understanding users’ choices and preferences in Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 161-178.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Incumbent business; sharing economy; management response; difference-in-differences; deep learning; convolutional neutral network; topic modeling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L8 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:1911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicholas Economides (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.NETinst.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.