This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Hierarchical Assignments: Stability and Fairness

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Eriksson, Kimmo (Stockholm University)
Karlander, Johan (Royal Institute of Technology)
Öller, Lars-Erik () (National Institute of Economic Research)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We study a simple assigning workers to employers, where each pair of a worker and an employer has a potential joint productivity, and the complete information about the market is contained in the matrix of potential productivities.

Under certain conditions that we specify, the market is hierarchical, in the sense that both workers and employers can be ordered according to ability, and the Pareto optimal assignment in terms of maximal total productivity is achieved by matching the top worker with the top employer and so on. In other words, we describe a market situation in which the above simple matching procedure is optimal.

Some further properties of hierarchies are presented. We can state explicit values for the earnings in the worker optimal and employer optimal solutions. We further show that our hierarchy concept is descrete analogue to the Ricardian differential rent model of Sattinger (1979), and that the latter one can easily be derived from our model.

We discuss the compatibility problems between fairness and stability of earnings and assignments. In particular, two notions of fairness that seem sensible in general fail to be stable in hierarchical markets. First, pairwise sharing the Pareto optimal product using a fixed sharing rule generates stable assignments only under a very restrictive assumption. Second, distributing the same amount to all workers preserves stability only in the extreme situation of an equal distribution of ability among workers. A uniform distribution of ability will always generate a smaller overall production than an uneaven distribution in Pareto optimum. we argue for another notion of fairness that turns out to be stable: an average between the worker optimal and employer otimal solutions.

The model can be used to illustrate imperfect competition, economic growth and corruption.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by National Institute of Economic Research in its series Working Paper with number 50.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 23 pages
Date of creation: 01 Mar 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hhs:nierwp:0050

Contact details of provider:
Postal: National Institute of Economic Research, P.O. Box 3116, SE-103 62 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: 46-(0)8-453 59 00
Fax: 46-(0)8-453 59 80
Email:
Web page: http://www.konj.se/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Britta Larsson).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Kremer, Michael, 1993. "The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 108(3), pages 551-75, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. H. R. Varian, 1973. "Equity, Envy and Efficiency," Working papers 115, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
  3. Tjalling C. Koopmans & Martin J. Beckmann, 1955. "Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 4, Cowles Foundation, Yale University. [Downloadable!]
  4. Sattinger, Michael, 1979. "Differential Rents and the Distribution of Earnings," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 60-71, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Bloch, Francis & Ryder, Harl, 2000. "Two-Sided Search, Marriages, and Matchmakers," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 41(1), pages 93-115, February.
  6. Lindbeck, A. & Snower, D.J., 1996. "Reorganization of Firms and Labor Market Inequality," Papers 605, Stockholm - International Economic Studies.
    Other versions:
  7. Burdett, Ken & Coles, Melvyn G, 1997. "Marriage and Class," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 112(1), pages 141-68, February.
  8. Sattinger, Michael, 1993. "Assignment Models of the Distribution of Earnings," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 831-80, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Feldman, Allan M & Kirman, Alan, 1974. "Fairness and Envy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(6), pages 995-1005, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.