IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/lufewp/2006_004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A conceptual framework for understanding Customer-based brand equity and price premium in grocery categories

Author

Listed:
  • Anselmsson, Johan

    (Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University)

  • Johansson, Ulf

    (Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University)

  • Persson, Niklas

    (Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University)

Abstract

Purpose: Seeks to, on empirical basis, develop a framework for understanding what really drives price premium and customer-based brand equity for consumer packaged groceries. Design/methodology/approach: Reviews empirical studies made within the area of brand equity and adjacent studies of consumer packaged groceries. Compares and analyses the results from an explorative and qualitative field study, including Swedish grocery consumer, with previous research on brand equity and food quality. Findings: A conceptual framework brand equity should ad considerably more to the understanding of cometition and price premium in the grocery sector than only quality. Brand equity in the grocery sector highlights the role of uniqueness, together with the four traditionally basic dimensions of brand equity is proposed. Relevant brand associations (origin, health, environment/animal friendliness, organisational associations and social image), and quality attributes (taste, odour, consistency/texture, appearance, function, packaging and ingredients) specific to groceries are identified and proposed for future measurement scales and model validating research. Practical implications: This paper conceptually establishes uniqueness as a central dimension of brand equity, and the need for an over all perspective in order to assure an external balance between customer and brand as well as an internal balance between the five dimensions of brand equity. Originality/value: Despite the fact that several of our most famous brand can be found within retail, the literature on customer-based brand equity is not yet rich enough to provide a sound conceptual foundation to understand, evaluate, measure or manage brand equity in grocery categories. This paper presents the first conceptual brand equity framework for groceries.

Suggested Citation

  • Anselmsson, Johan & Johansson, Ulf & Persson, Niklas, 2006. "A conceptual framework for understanding Customer-based brand equity and price premium in grocery categories," Working Paper Series 2006/4, Lund University, Institute of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhb:lufewp:2006_004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lri.lu.se/pdf/wp/2006-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maignan, Isabelle & Ferrell, O. C., 2003. "Nature of corporate responsibilities: Perspectives from American, French, and German consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 55-67, January.
    2. Brunsø, Karen & Fjord, Thomas Ahle & Grunert, Klaus G., 2002. "Consumers' food choice and quality perception," MAPP Working Papers 77, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    3. Wallace E. Huffman, 2003. "Consumers' Acceptance of (and Resistance to) Genetically Modified Foods in High-Income Countries: Effects of Labels and Information in an Uncertain Environment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1112-1118.
    4. Netemeyer, Richard G. & Krishnan, Balaji & Pullig, Chris & Wang, Guangping & Yagci, Mehmet & Dean, Dwane & Ricks, Joe & Wirth, Ferdinand, 2004. "Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 209-224, February.
    5. Bart J. Bronnenberg & Luc Wathieu, 1996. "Asymmetric Promotion Effects and Brand Positioning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 379-394.
    6. Sethuraman Raj, 2003. "Measuring National Brands' Equity over Store Brands," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Hong, Sung-Tai & Wyer, Robert S, Jr, 1990. "Determinants of Product Evaluation: Effects of the Time Interval between Knowledge of a Product's Country of Origin and Information about Its Specific Attributes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(3), pages 277-288, December.
    8. Jean-Noël Kapferer, 2004. "The New Strategic Brand Management," Post-Print hal-00786821, HAL.
    9. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Dhar, Ravi & Sherman, Steven J, 1996. "The Effect of Common and Unique Features in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 23(3), pages 193-203, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anselmsson, Johan & Bondesson, Niklas, 2015. "Brand value chain in practise; the relationship between mindset and market performance metrics: A study of the Swedish market for FMCG," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 58-70.
    2. Buil, Isabel & de Chernatony, Leslie & Martínez, Eva, 2013. "Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 115-122.
    3. Dwivedi, Abhishek & Nayeem, Tahmid & Murshed, Feisal, 2018. "Brand experience and consumers’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) a price premium: Mediating role of brand credibility and perceived uniqueness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 100-107.
    4. Mónica Díaz-Bustamante & Sonia Carcelén & María Puelles, 2016. "Image of Luxury Brands," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    5. Mühlbacher, Hans & Raies, Karine & Grohs, Reinhard & Koll, Oliver, 2016. "Drivers of brand strength: Configural paths to strong cognitive brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2774-2780.
    6. Anselmsson, Johan & Burt, Steve & Tunca, Burak, 2017. "An integrated retailer image and brand equity framework: Re-examining, extending, and restructuring retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 194-203.
    7. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2014. "A psychometric theory that measures up to marketing reality: An adapted Many Faceted IRT model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 93-102.
    8. Boisvert, Jean & Christodoulides, George & Sajid Khan, M., 2023. "Toward a better understanding of key determinants and consequences of masstige consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    10. Kapoor, Ankur & Sahay, Arvind & Singh, Nandini C. & Chandrasekhar Pammi, V.S. & Banerjee, Prantosh, 2023. "The neural correlates and the underlying processes of weak brand choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Coderre, François & Sirieix, Lucie & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2022. "The facets of consumer-based food label equity: Measurement, structure and managerial relevance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Pankaj Kumar Singh & J. K. Pattanayak, 2016. "Study of the Relationship among the Factors of Brand Equity: A Study on Fast-food Brands," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1227-1239, October.
    13. Raffaele Filieri & Zhibin Lin & Simona D’Antone & Elena Chatzopoulou, 2019. "A cultural approach to brand equity: the role of brand mianzi and brand popularity in China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 376-394, July.
    14. Mohammad Shariq & Bilal Mustafa Khan & Aftab Haider Rizvi, 2014. "An Exploratory Analysis of Marketing Elements and Brand Equity in the UAE FMCG Category," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 3(1-2), pages 121-136, June.
    15. Deli Yang & Mahmut Sonmez & Mario Gonzalez & Yi Liu & Carol Y. Yoder, 2019. "Consumer-based brand equity and consumer-based brand performance: evidence from smartphone brands in the USA," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 717-732, November.
    16. repec:thr:techub:10022:y:2021:i:1:p:676-699 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Tsuen-Ho Hsu & Li-Chu Hung & Jia-Wei Tang, 2012. "An analytical model for building brand equity in hospitality firms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 355-378, May.
    18. Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Eleonora Di Maria, 2020. "Sustainability countenance in brand equity: a critical review and future research directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 15-34, January.
    19. Rina Makgosa & Boikanyo A. Molefhi, 2012. "Rebranding an Institution of Higher Education in Botswana," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Prashant Kumar & Tao Meng & Sajal Kabiraj, 2019. "Effect of Crowdsourcing on Consumer Brand Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 7(1), pages 42-58, January.
    21. Magnoni, Fanny & Valette-Florence, Pierre & De Barnier, Virginie, 2021. "Modeling the effects of place heritage and place experience on residents’ behavioral intentions toward a city: A mediation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 428-442.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Brand equity; price premium; food quality; retailer brands;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:lufewp:2006_004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elsbeth Andersson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ielunse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.