IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01663683.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Bayart

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Patrick Bonnel

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

We present the results of a web survey presented to non-respondents of a main telephone survey and compare declared mobility of both survey modes. After a description of the population who answered online, we summarise travel patterns and estimate a selection bias. Results are consistent with the hypothesis of an under declaration attributable to the web, as far as we know, that the risk of omitting trips concerns especially short trips and less constrained trip purposes. From comparison with a previous face-to-face and web survey we give some perspectives for future household travel surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2015. "How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study," Post-Print halshs-01663683, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01663683
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.011
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01663683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01663683/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2012. "Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys: comparability challenges?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1147-1171, November.
    2. Mroz, Thomas A, 1987. "The Sensitivity of an Empirical Model of Married Women's Hours of Work to Economic and Statistical Assumptions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 765-799, July.
    3. A. D. Roy, 1951. "Some Thoughts On The Distribution Of Earnings," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 135-146.
    4. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    5. Patrick Bonnel, 2003. "Postal, Telephone and Face-to-face Surveys : How Comparable Are They?," Post-Print halshs-00091025, HAL.
    6. Maddala,G. S., 1986. "Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521338257.
    7. Heckman, James J, 1990. "Varieties of Selection Bias," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 313-318, May.
    8. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel & Catherine Morency, 2008. "Survey Mode Integration and Data Fusion: Methods and challenges," Post-Print halshs-00329174, HAL.
    9. Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Chen, Cynthia, 2004. "TTB or not TTB, that is the question: a review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(9-10), pages 643-675.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Basa-Martinez, Diana Denise F. & Cabrera, Janet Y. & Dionaldo, LA G. & Orillo, Jonathan Gavino R. & Ramos, Paul John M. & Ocampo, Lanndon A., 2018. "An exploration of a respondent pre-qualifying framework to increase response rates in social media initiated online surveys," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 239-261.
    2. Centrih Vasilij & Viršček Andrej & Smukavec Andreja & Bučar Nataša & Arnež Marta, 2020. "Mode effect analysis in the case of daily passenger mobility survey," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 43-57, December.
    3. Nina Verzosa & Stephen Greaves & Chinh Ho & Mark Davis, 2021. "Stated willingness to participate in travel surveys: a cross-country and cross-methods comparison," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1311-1327, June.
    4. Roman Najdený & František Križan & Daniel Gurňák & Kristína Bilková, 2022. "Buy Domestic? Emerging Food Nationalism in Slovakia," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(4), pages 382-396, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Bonnel & Caroline Bayart & Brett Smith, 2015. "Workshop Synthesis: Comparing and Combining Survey Modes," Post-Print halshs-01663724, HAL.
    2. Casey B. Mulligan & Yona Rubinstein, 2004. "The Closing of the Gender Gap as a Roy Model Illusion," NBER Working Papers 10892, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Casey B. Mulligan & Yona Rubinstein, 2005. "Selection, Investment, and Women's Relative Wages Since 1975," NBER Working Papers 11159, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. James J. Heckman, 2008. "Econometric Causality," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 76(1), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Farrell, Lisa & Walker, Ian, 1999. "The welfare effects of lotto: evidence from the UK," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 99-120, April.
    6. Angrist, Joshua D., 1997. "Conditional independence in sample selection models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 103-112, February.
    7. Aydemir, Abdurrahman, 2002. "Effects of Selection Criteria and Economic Opportunities on the Characteristics of Immigrants," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2002182e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    8. Adrián Rubli, 2012. "La importancia de corregir por el sesgo de selección en el análisis de las brechas salariales por género: un estudio para Argentina, Brasil y México," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 1-36, November.
    9. van der Klaauw, Bas, 2014. "From micro data to causality: Forty years of empirical labor economics," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 88-97.
    10. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2010. "Web and face-to-face travel surveys: how comparable are they? [Enquête déplacements web - face-à-face : quelle comparabilité ?]," Post-Print halshs-00566236, HAL.
    11. Masayuki Hirukawa & Di Liu & Irina Murtazashvili & Artem Prokhorov, 2023. "DS-HECK: double-lasso estimation of Heckman selection model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 3167-3195, June.
    12. De Hoyos, R.E., 2006. "Structural Modelling of Female Labour Participation and Occupation Decisions," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0611, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Lee, Ji Hyung & Park, Byoung G., 2023. "Nonparametric identification and estimation of the extended Roy model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1087-1113.
    14. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2010. "L'impact du mode d'enquête sur la mesure des comportements de mobilité," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 437(1), pages 47-70.
    15. Zaiceva, Anzelika, 2006. "Self-Selection and the Returns to Geographic Mobility: What Can Be Learned from the German Reunification "Experiment"," IZA Discussion Papers 2524, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Heckman, James J. & Lalonde, Robert J. & Smith, Jeffrey A., 1999. "The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 31, pages 1865-2097, Elsevier.
    17. Michael Bar & Seik Kim & Oksana Leukhina, 2015. "Gender Wage Gap Accounting: The Role of Selection Bias," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(5), pages 1729-1750, October.
    18. Qi Li & Jeffrey Scott Racine, 2006. "Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 8355.
    19. Leung, Siu Fai & Yu, Shihti, 1996. "On the choice between sample selection and two-part models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1-2), pages 197-229.
    20. Ismaël Mourifié & Marc Henry & Romuald Méango, 2020. "Sharp Bounds and Testability of a Roy Model of STEM Major Choices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(8), pages 3220-3283.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01663683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.