Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Adequate Moods for Non-EU Decision Making in a Sequential Framework

Contents:

Author Info

  • Nathalie Etchart(-Vincent)

    ()
    (CIRED - Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement - Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement [CIRAD] : UMR56 - CNRS : UMR8568 - École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) - École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC) - Ecole Nationale du Génie Rural des Eaux et Forêts, GRID - Groupe de Recherche sur le risque, l'Information et la Décision - CNRS : UMR8534 - École normale supérieure (ENS) - Cachan)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    In a dynamic (sequential) framework, departures from the independence axiom (IND) are reputed to induce violations of dynamic consistency (DC), which may in turn have undesirable normative consequences. This result thus questions the normative acceptability of non expected-utility (non-EU) models, which precisely relax IND. This paper pursues a twofold objective. The main one is to discuss the normative conclusion: we show that usual arguments linking violations of DC to departures from IND are actually based on specific (but usually remaining implicit) assumptions which may rightfully be released, so that it is actually possible for a non-EU maximizer to be dynamically consistent and thus avoid normative difficulties. Our second objective is to introduce a kind of 'reality principle' (through two other evaluation criteria) in order to mitigate the normative requirement when examining adequate moods for non-EU decision making.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/03/76/60/PDF/papier_T_D_version_sur_hal_et_repec_septembre_2005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by HAL in its series CIRED Working Papers with number halshs-00004832.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 05 Oct 2005
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hal:ciredw:halshs-00004832

    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00004832
    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

    Related research

    Keywords: Non-expected utility; sequential choice; dynamic consistency; money pump; consequentialism.;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Bernasconi, Michele, 1994. "Nonlinear Preferences and Two-Stage Lotteries: Theories and Evidence," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 104(422), pages 54-70, January.
    2. Hammond, Peter J, 1976. "Changing Tastes and Coherent Dynamic Choice," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 159-73, February.
    3. Uzi Segal, 1989. "Two-Stage Lotteries Without the Reduction Axiom," UCLA Economics Working Papers, UCLA Department of Economics 552, UCLA Department of Economics.
    4. Thaler, Richard H & Shefrin, H M, 1981. "An Economic Theory of Self-Control," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(2), pages 392-406, April.
    5. Ted O'Donoghue and Matthew Rabin ., 1997. "Doing It Now or Later," Economics Working Papers, University of California at Berkeley 97-253, University of California at Berkeley.
    6. Camerer, Colin F, 1989. " An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 61-104, April.
    7. Schmeidler, D. & Karni, E., 1990. "A Temporal Dynamic Consistency And Expected Utility Theory," Papers, Tel Aviv 39-90, Tel Aviv.
    8. Geir B. Asheim, 1995. "Individual and Collective Time-Consistency," Discussion Papers, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science 1128, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    9. Machina, Mark J, 1989. "Dynamic Consistency and Non-expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 27(4), pages 1622-68, December.
    10. Hammond, Peter J, 1989. "Consistent Plans, Consequentialism, and Expected Utility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 57(6), pages 1445-49, November.
    11. Laibson, David, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 112(2), pages 443-77, May.
    12. Segal, Uzi, 1997. "Dynamic Consistency and Reference Points," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 208-219, January.
    13. Karni, E. & Safra, Z., 1988. "Behaviorally Consistent Optimal Stopping Rules," Papers, Tel Aviv 9-88, Tel Aviv.
    14. Schlee, Edward, 1990. " The Value of Information in Anticipated Utility Theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 83-92, March.
    15. Orphanides, Athanasios & Zervos, David, 1998. "Myopia and Addictive Behaviour," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(446), pages 75-91, January.
    16. Epstein Larry G. & Le Breton Michel, 1993. "Dynamically Consistent Beliefs Must Be Bayesian," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Cubitt, Robin P & Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 1998. "Dynamic Choice and the Common Ratio Effect: An Experimental Investigation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(450), pages 1362-80, September.
    18. Sarin, Rakesh & Wakker, Peter P, 1998. "Dynamic Choice and NonExpected Utility," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 87-119, November.
    19. Schelling, Thomas C, 1984. "Self-Command in Practice, in Policy, and in a Theory of Rational Choice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:ciredw:halshs-00004832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.