Whether or not inventories can be used to break the link between production and sales is crucial for understanding firms’ employment response to productivity shocks. In a Taylor-type sticky-price model with inventories, we show that the employment response to a productivity shock depends on the extent to which goods are storable. Whereas in conventional sticky-price models without inventories, productivity shocks reduce employment, the same shocks cause firms in our economy to expand output relative to sales, build up inventories and, as a result, hire more workers. We then estimate the employment response to productivity shocks in disaggregated U.S. manufacturing data from 1958 to 1996. Consistent with our theory, we find that an industry’s employment response to productivity shifts is strongly correlated with measures of inventory holding costs.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond in its series Working Paper with number
04-09.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)