The extensive economic research of bankruptcy within the last decade has made many issues connected with bankruptcy legislation much clearer but there is still a large area of disagreement about how an optimal bankruptcy law should look like. At the same time, the actual bankruptcy laws in various countries differ substantially and there is an agreement that there is no one-size-fits-all solution. This paper sets stage for the debate about the optimal bankruptcy law design in the Czech Republic. It shows what problems arise in connection with bankruptcy, what methods can be used to solve them, and what are the trade-offs faced by the use of individual methods. First, the question why bankruptcy legislation is needed at all is answered. Further, three mutually intersecting approaches to the determinants of optimal bankruptcy law design are presented: concepts of ex-post and ex-ante efficiency, principal-agent theory view, and the emphasis on judicial corruption problems within different bankruptcy designs.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies in its series Working Papers IES with number
62.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)