This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Willingness to Pay for Whale Shark Conservation in Sorsogon, Philippines

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Anabeth L Indab () (Resources, Environment and Economics Center for Studies, Inc. (REECS))
Abstract

Societies continually make choices among various options that affect their welfare. Tradeoffs are typically difficult to make especially in a developing country context where even the basic needs are sometimes hard to finance. It then becomes an empirical question whether people from a developing country perceive any benefit from what can be considered as a non-essential good like the preservation of certain endangered species and would therefore be willing to sacrifice certain things for it. Using contingent valuation methodology (CVM), this paper sets out to determine if such benefit for whale shark preservation exists for developing country citizens, or if they are too poor to pay for conservation. The study was carried out in Sorsogon province where whale sharks are popularly known; the area is touted worldwide as having the largest congregation of the species during peak season. Various multivariate logit regression analyses were done to generate sensitivity analysis of the estimates prior to the welfare value calculation. Sensitivity to payment designs was also tested through hypothesis testing. Survey results show that the people are aware and concerned about environmental issues, including the precarious condition of whale sharks in Sorsogon. They are not, however, able or willing to pay for the implementation of the Conservation Program because poverty, employment, and other economic concerns take precedence over environmental issues. Detailed observance of the entire CV exercise generated zero or close to zero welfare value.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/11939069111AnabethTR.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 2007
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA) in its series EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper with number tp200711t2.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Nov 2007
Date of revision: Nov 2007
Handle: RePEc:eep:tpaper:tp200711t2

Contact details of provider:
Postal: c/o IDRC, 22 Cross Street, #02-55, South Bridge Court, Singapore 048421
Phone: 6438 4844
Fax: 65 6438 7877
Email:
Web page: http://www.eepsea.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Arief Anshory yusuf).

Related research
Keywords: willingness to pay; conservation; Philippines;

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Richard Carson, 1999. "Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series 1999-26, Department of Economics, UC San Diego. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Loomis, John B. & White, Douglas S., 1996. "Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 197-206, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Halstead, John M. & Luloff, A.E. & Stevens, Thomas H., 1992. "Protest Bidders In Contingent Valuation," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 21(2), October. [Downloadable!]
  4. Bradley Jorgensen & Geoffrey Syme & Brian Bishop & Blair Nancarrow, 1999. "Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 14(1), pages 131-150, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Richard Carson & Nicholas Flores & Norman Meade, 2001. "Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 19(2), pages 173-210, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  6. Patricia Champ & Richard Bishop, 2001. "Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 19(4), pages 383-402, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Hanemann, W Michael, 1994. "Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 19-43, Fall. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Reiling, Stephen D., 2000. "Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 93-107, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can use convenient plug-ins to search directly IDEAS from your browser.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.