IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirpro/2021rp-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Interventions to reverse the trend towards light-duty trucks in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Verena Gruber
  • Ingrid Peignier
  • Elinora Pentcheva
  • Anshu Suri

Abstract

The primary objective of this report was to investigate the effectiveness of different messages to mitigate the liking and purchase of energy-intensive vehicles, particularly sport utility vehicles (SUVs). It presents the results of four experimental studies on both topics relevant to policymakers (i.e., regulating price presentation and working on financial empowerment initiatives to increase citizens' numerical and financial literacy) and topics that can be leveraged in social marketing campaigns to help reverse the trend toward energy-intensive vehicles. Specifically, three experiments testing aspects of personal identity, social norms, and time orientation find the following: • Creating negative perceptions of SUV drivers as people with below-average driving skills significantly reduces both appreciation of SUVs and intention to purchase an SUV, regardless of whether the individual already owns a gas-guzzling vehicle. • Changing the social norm around SUVs: SUVs have become a social norm as they were the top selling vehicle in Canada in 2020, and the literature in the field clearly demonstrates the importance of social norms in influencing consumer decision-making. Our results show that these norms can also be used to counter the trend toward gas-guzzlers by emphasizing that compact cars are the normal vehicle to choose. • Get the public to think about the legacy left to their children by purchasing a light truck using time-based cues: highlighting a future orientation decreases the liking and intention to purchase energy-intensive vehicles. The intervention is particularly effective for individuals who already recognize the environmental impact of personal transport. • Building individual capacity to consider all vehicle costs: We find that while individuals are generally able to stay within their budgets, those with low levels of numerical and financial literacy, as well as those who are financially dissatisfied (regardless of their level of literacy), make many more choices that exceed their budgets. This experience underscores the importance of initiatives to improve financial literacy, as particularly vulnerable consumers appear to be attracted to SUV purchases. The research documented in this second report builds directly on the results of the exploratory phase documented in the CIRANO 2021RP-06 project report which assessed the motivations, attitudes and contextual factors influencing vehicle choices among Canadians and empirically tests the effectiveness of different messages in addressing the trend towards fuel-inefficient vehicles in Canada. L'objectif principal de ce rapport était d'étudier l'efficacité de différents messages visant à atténuer le goût et l'achat de véhicules à forte consommation d'énergie, en particulier les véhicules utilitaires sport (VUS). Il présente les résultats de quatre études expérimentales portant à la fois sur des thèmes pertinents pour les décideurs politiques (c'est-à-dire réglementer la présentation des prix et travailler sur des initiatives de renforcement des capacités financières afin de renforcer les connaissances numériques et financières des citoyens) et sur des thèmes qui peuvent être exploités dans des campagnes de marketing social pour aider à inverser la tendance vers des véhicules à forte consommation d'énergie. Plus précisément, trois expériences testant des aspects de l'identité personnelle, des normes sociales et de l'orientation temporelle permettent de constater ce qui suit : • Créer des perceptions négatives des conducteurs de SUV en tant que personnes ayant des compétences de conduite inférieures à la moyenne contribue à réduire de manière significative à la fois l'appréciation des VUS et l'intention d'acheter un VUS, indépendamment du fait que la personne possède déjà un véhicule énergivore ou non. • Changer la norme sociale autour des VUS : Les VUS sont devenus une norme sociale de facto puisqu'ils étaient les véhicules les plus vendus au Canada en 2020, et la littérature dans le domaine démontre clairement l'importance des normes sociales pour influencer la prise de décision des consommateurs. Nos résultats montrent que ces normes peuvent également être utilisées pour contrer la tendance aux véhicules énergivores en soulignant que les voitures de taille compacte sont le véhicule normal à choisir. • Amener le public a? re?fle?chir a? l’he?ritage laisse? a? ses enfants en achetant un camion le?ger a? l’aide de repe?res temporels : le fait de faire ressortir une orientation vers l'avenir permet de diminuer le goût et l'intention d'achat de véhicules à forte consommation d'énergie. L'intervention est particulièrement efficace pour les individus qui reconnaissent déjà l'effet du transport individuel sur l'environnement. • Renforcer les capacite?s individuelles a? tenir compte de tous les cou?ts associe?s aux ve?hicules : Nous constatons que, si les individus sont généralement capables de respecter leur budget, ceux qui ont un faible niveau de compétences numériques et financières, ainsi que ceux qui sont financièrement insatisfaits (indépendamment de leur niveau de compétences), font beaucoup plus de choix qui dépassent leur budget. Cette expérience souligne l'importance des initiatives visant à améliorer les compétences financières, car les consommateurs particulièrement vulnérables semblent être attirés par l'achat de VUS. La recherche documentée dans ce deuxième rapport s'appuie directement sur les résultats de la phase exploratoire documentés dans le rapport de projet CIRANO 2021RP-06 qui a évalué les motivations, les attitudes et les facteurs contextuels influençant les choix de véhicules chez les Canadiens et teste empiriquement l'efficacité de différents messages pour contrer la tendance à l'utilisation de véhicules énergivores au Canada.

Suggested Citation

  • Verena Gruber & Ingrid Peignier & Elinora Pentcheva & Anshu Suri, 2021. "Interventions to reverse the trend towards light-duty trucks in Canada," CIRANO Project Reports 2021rp-29, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2021rp-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2021RP-29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anika Stuppy & Nicole L Mead & Stijn M J Van Osselaer & JoAndrea Hoegg & Eileen Fischer & Kirmani Amna, 2020. "I Am, Therefore I Buy: Low Self-Esteem and the Pursuit of Self-Verifying Consumption [The Origins of Deference: When Do People Prefer Lower Status?]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 956-973.
    2. Annamaria Lusardi & Olivia S. Mitchell, 2014. "The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(1), pages 5-44, March.
    3. Cho, Yoon-Na & Thyroff, Anastasia & Rapert, Molly I. & Park, Seong-Yeon & Lee, Hyun Ju, 2013. "To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1052-1059.
    4. Xun (Irene) Huang & Zhongqiang (Tak) Huang & Robert S. Wyer, 2016. "Slowing Down in the Good Old Days: The Effect of Nostalgia on Consumer Patience," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 372-387.
    5. Ravi Mehta & Joandrea Hoegg & Amitav Chakravarti, 2011. "Knowing Too Much: Expertise-Induced False Recall Effects in Product Comparison," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(3), pages 535-554.
    6. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    7. Gathergood, John, 2012. "Self-control, financial literacy and consumer over-indebtedness," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 590-602.
    8. Mark Grinblatt & Matti Keloharju & Seppo Ikäheimo, 2008. "Social Influence and Consumption: Evidence from the Automobile Purchases of Neighbors," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(4), pages 735-753, November.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:62-74 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Katherine White & Darren W. Dahl, 2007. "Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 525-536, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verena Gruber & Ingrid Peignier & Charlotte Dubuc, 2024. "Pratiques et tactiques de vente des concessionnaires automobiles au Québec," CIRANO Project Reports 2023rp-21, CIRANO.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grohmann, Antonia & Hamdan, Jana S., 2020. "The Effect of Self-Control on Borrowing: Experimental Evidence," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 264, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    2. Grohmann, Antonia, 2018. "Financial literacy and financial behavior: Evidence from the emerging Asian middle class," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 129-143.
    3. Claus Thustrup Kreiner & Søren Leth-Petersen & Louise Charlotte Willerslev-Olsen, 2020. "Financial Trouble Across Generations: Evidence from the Universe of Personal Loans in Denmark," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(625), pages 233-262.
    4. Beckmann, Elisabeth & Stix, Helmut, 2015. "Foreign currency borrowing and knowledge about exchange rate risk," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-16.
    5. Gathergood, John & Weber, Jörg, 2017. "Financial literacy, present bias and alternative mortgage products," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 58-83.
    6. Tim Kaiser & Lukas Menkhoff, 2017. "Does Financial Education Impact Financial Literacy and Financial Behavior, and If So, When?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 31(3), pages 611-630.
    7. Antonia Grohmann & Jana Hamdan, 2021. "The Effect of Self-Control and Financial Literacy on Impulse Borrowing: Experimental Evidence," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1950, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Oscar A. Stolper & Andreas Walter, 2017. "Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(5), pages 581-643, July.
    9. Cristina OTTAVIANI & Daniela VANDONE, 2016. "Is Impulsivity a Mediator of the Relationship between Financial Literacy and Debt Decisions?," Departmental Working Papers 2016-06, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    10. Grohmann, Antonia & Kouwenberg, Roy & Menkhoff, Lukas, 2015. "Childhood roots of financial literacy," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 114-133.
    11. Grohmann, Antonia & Hübler, Olaf & Kouwenberg, Roy & Menkhoff, Lukas, 2021. "Financial literacy: Thai middle-class women do not lag behind," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    12. Ali Saleh Alshebami & Theyazn H. H. Aldhyani, 2022. "The Interplay of Social Influence, Financial Literacy, and Saving Behaviour among Saudi Youth and the Moderating Effect of Self-Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Presbitero, Andrea & Agarwal, Sumit & Silva, Andre F. & Wix, Carlo, 2022. "Who Pays For Your Rewards? Redistribution in the Credit Card Market," CEPR Discussion Papers 17733, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. French, Declan & McKillop, Donal, 2016. "Financial literacy and over-indebtedness in low-income households," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Remya Tressa Jacob & Rudra Sensarma, 2022. "Does knowledge empower? A story of debt literacy and credit usage in rural consumer finance," Working papers 529, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    16. Galariotis, Emilios & Monne, Jerome, 2023. "Basic debt literacy and debt behavior," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Gathergood, John & Wylie, Daniel, 2018. "Why are some households so poorly insured?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Arrondel, Luc & Calvo-Pardo, Hector & Giannitsarou, Chryssi & Haliassos, Michael, 2022. "Informative social interactions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 246-263.
    19. Grohmann, Antonia & Kouwenberg, Roy & Menkhoff, Lukas, 2014. "Roots of Financial Literacy," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100550, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Brown, Martin & Henchoz, Caroline & Spycher, Thomas, 2018. "Culture and financial literacy: Evidence from a within-country language border," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 62-85.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SUVs; Light trucks; Experimental economics; Consumer behavior; Social marketing; VUS; Camions légers; Économie expérimentale; Comportement du consommateur; marketing social;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2021rp-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.