IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331611.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs): a product level approach

Author

Listed:
  • Fontagné, Lionel
  • Laborde, David
  • Mitaritonna, Maria Cristina

Abstract

With the temporarily suspension of the WTO negotiations, the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) launched by the EU in 2002 and that will come into being in 2008 , becomes the major the major trade challenge for the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries(ACP) which nowadays are the most vulnerable countries in the global trading system. The negotiations on EPAs define a new stage in the development policy of the EU towards developing countries which is fully compatible with the WTO trading rules, in the sense of article XXIV GATT. However many concerns arise. The first of them is the ability of ACP countries to give preferential access to EU products, entering in a reciprocal preferences system with the EU. Moreover, the calendar is extremely tight and numerous levels of freedom are still to be defined as the modalities of trade liberalization that will fit the WTO rules (scope of coverage, speed). Our study intends to present a very detailed analysis of the trade-related aspects of EPAs negotiations. We use a dynamic partial equilibrium model at the HS6 level (5,113 hs6 products). The main source of trade data are Comext and BACI, while ad-valorem tariffs and Tariffs-RateQuotas are provided by MacMapHS6v2. Thanks to this we can accurately deal with the crucial aspect of sensitive products. Sensitive products selection will be based on different criterions, such as "political sensibility" or "sectors' vulnerability", at the single country level and by group of negotiation. The dynamic aspect of the model will allow different transition periods of EPAs implementation to be taken into account. Different simulations will be performed in order to assess the impact of both the alternative EPAs negotiations and the "alternative trade agreements" to them, whenever EPAs would not be signed. The consequences of EPA will be assessed through different indicators: exports and imports variation, changes in duties income, current account and also, food balance (including calories indicators). A discussion will be conducted to compare these PE results to GE analyses conducted on the EPAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Fontagné, Lionel & Laborde, David & Mitaritonna, Maria Cristina, 2007. "Assessing the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs): a product level approach," Conference papers 331611, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331611/files/3246.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manne, Alan & Mendelsohn, Robert & Richels, Richard, 1995. "MERGE : A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 17-34, January.
    2. Ottmar Edenhofer, Kai Lessmann, Claudia Kemfert, Michael Grubb and Jonathan Kohler, 2006. "Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 57-108.
    3. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    4. Michael Grubb, Carlo Carraro and John Schellnhuber, 2006. "Technological Change for Atmospheric Stabilization: Introductory Overview to the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Yanli & Ishikawa, Masanobu & Hagiwara, Taiji, 2015. "Economic and environmental impact analysis of carbon tariffs on Chinese exports," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 80-95.
    2. Nijkamp, Peter & Wang, Shunli & Kremers, Hans, 2005. "Modeling the impacts of international climate change policies in a CGE context: The use of the GTAP-E model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 955-974, December.
    3. Zhu, Xueqin & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2005. "A model for consumers' preferences for Novel Protein Foods and environmental quality," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 720-744, July.
    4. Dirk WILLENBOCKEL & Sherman ROBINSON, "undated". "The Global Financial Crisis, LDC Exports and Welfare: Analysis with a World Trade Model," EcoMod2009 21500092, EcoMod.
    5. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang & Atsagli, Philip, 2017. "Carbon taxes, industrial production, welfare and the environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 305-313.
    6. Aaditya Mattoo & Arvind Subramanian & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe & Jianwu He, 2012. "Can Global De-Carbonization Inhibit Developing Country Industrialization?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 26(2), pages 296-319.
    7. Markandya, A. & Antimiani, A. & Costantini, V. & Martini, C. & Palma, A. & Tommasino, M.C., 2015. "Analyzing Trade-offs in International Climate Policy Options: The Case of the Green Climate Fund," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 93-107.
    8. Michael Grubb & Jean-Francois Mercure & Pablo Salas & Rutger-Jan Lange & Ida Sognnaes, 2018. "Systems Innovation, Inertia and Pliability: A mathematical exploration with implications for climate change abatement," Working Papers EPRG 1808, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    9. Marco Rogna, 2020. "Microeconomic models of a production economy with environmental externalities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2625-2650, March.
    10. Winchester Niven & Paltsev Sergey & Reilly John M, 2011. "Will Border Carbon Adjustments Work?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Shiell, Leslie & Lyssenko, Nikita, 2014. "Climate policy and induced R&D: How great is the effect?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 279-294.
    12. Roberto Roson & Dominique Van der Mensbrugghe, 2012. "Climate change and economic growth: impacts and interactions," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 270-285.
    13. Kurtze, Christiane & Springer, Katrin, 1999. "Modelling the economic impact of global warming in a general equilibrium framework," Kiel Working Papers 922, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Zhu, Xueqin & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2005. "Modelling consumers' preferences for Novel Protein Foods and environmental quality," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 949-953, September.
    15. Roson, Roberto, 2013. "A modelling framework for assessing the economic impact of climate change in the Caribbean," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    16. Lau, Morten I. & Rutherford, Thomas F. & Sørensen, Anders, 2001. "Designing Aid Programs for Small Open Economies," Conference papers 330916, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Webster, Mort & Paltsev, Sergey & Reilly, John, 2008. "Autonomous efficiency improvement or income elasticity of energy demand: Does it matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 2785-2798, November.
    18. Usher, Will & Strachan, Neil, 2012. "Critical mid-term uncertainties in long-term decarbonisation pathways," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 433-444.
    19. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Modeling environmental policy with and without abatement substitution: A tradeoff between economics and environment?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 34-43.
    20. Gerboni, Raffaella & Grosso, Daniele & Carpignano, Andrea & Dalla Chiara, Bruno, 2017. "Linking energy and transport models to support policy making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 336-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.