IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/hiclch/209387.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Integrated domain model for operative offshore installation planning

In: Digital Transformation in Maritime and City Logistics: Smart Solutions for Logistics. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 28

Author

Listed:
  • Rippel, Daniel
  • Jathe, Nicolas
  • Lütjen, Michael
  • Szczerbicka, Helena
  • Freitag, Michael

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to identify common structural elements in the descriptions of both approaches, enabling the application of model transformations. Methodology: Several models of both types will be compared, combining relevant concepts, i.e., entities, attributes and relationships into a generalized model. In a second step, elements crucial to either type of model are identified. For the remaining elements, interdependencies and redundancies will be identified to enable a model reduction. Findings: While the structure and notation of both approaches are different, both describe the same fundamental concepts and relationships. The article provides a data model of these common concepts for the operational planning of offshore activities, including weather restrictions and forecasts. Originality: In current literature, there exist no approaches to combine mathematical optimization with event-discrete simulations in the context of offshore wind farm installations. To harness the advantages of both approaches in an integrated methodology, a model of common concepts is required, which does not exist at this time.

Suggested Citation

  • Rippel, Daniel & Jathe, Nicolas & Lütjen, Michael & Szczerbicka, Helena & Freitag, Michael, 2019. "Integrated domain model for operative offshore installation planning," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digital Transformation in Maritime and City Logistics: Smart Solutions for Logistics. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics, volume 28, pages 25-54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209387
    DOI: 10.15480/882.2488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209387/1/hicl-2019-28-025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15480/882.2488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ursavas, Evrim, 2017. "A benders decomposition approach for solving the offshore wind farm installation planning at the North Sea," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 703-714.
    2. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    3. Chandra Ade Irawan & Graham Wall & Dylan Jones, 2019. "An optimisation model for scheduling the decommissioning of an offshore wind farm," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(2), pages 513-548, June.
    4. Breton, Simon-Philippe & Moe, Geir, 2009. "Status, plans and technologies for offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 646-654.
    5. Kerkhove, L.-P. & Vanhoucke, M., 2017. "Optimised scheduling for weather sensitive offshore construction projects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 58-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Rippel & Fatemeh Abasian Foroushani & Michael Lütjen & Michael Freitag, 2021. "A Crew Scheduling Model to Incrementally Optimize Workforce Assignments for Offshore Wind Farm Constructions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Rippel, Daniel & Peng, Shengrui & Lütjen, Michael & Sczcerbicka, Helena & Freitag, Michael, 2020. "Model transformation framework for scheduling offshore logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 521-552, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), 2020. "Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability," Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, volume 30, number 30.
    4. Karimirad, Madjid & Michailides, Constantine, 2015. "V-shaped semisubmersible offshore wind turbine: An alternative concept for offshore wind technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 126-143.
    5. Zountouridou, E.I. & Kiokes, G.C. & Chakalis, S. & Georgilakis, P.S. & Hatziargyriou, N.D., 2015. "Offshore floating wind parks in the deep waters of Mediterranean Sea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 433-448.
    6. Rodrigues, S. & Restrepo, C. & Kontos, E. & Teixeira Pinto, R. & Bauer, P., 2015. "Trends of offshore wind projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1114-1135.
    7. Tjaberings, Jorick & Fazi, Stefano & Ursavas, Evrim, 2022. "Evaluating operational strategies for the installation of offshore wind turbine substructures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Apostolos Tsouvalas, 2020. "Underwater Noise Emission Due to Offshore Pile Installation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-41, June.
    9. Arvesen, Ø. & Medbø, V. & Fleten, S.-E. & Tomasgard, A. & Westgaard, S., 2013. "Linepack storage valuation under price uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 155-164.
    10. Emad Mohamed & Parinaz Jafari & Adam Chehouri & Simaan AbouRizk, 2021. "Simulation-Based Approach for Lookahead Scheduling of Onshore Wind Projects Subject to Weather Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    11. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2014. "Study on offshore wind power potential and wind farm optimization in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 519-531.
    12. Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2010. "Productivity and development issues of global wind turbine industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1048-1058, April.
    13. Albert H. Schrotenboer & Evrim Ursavas & Iris F. A. Vis, 2019. "A Branch-and-Price-and-Cut Algorithm for Resource-Constrained Pickup and Delivery Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 1001-1022, July.
    14. Luis M. Abadie & José M. Chamorro, 2014. "Valuation of Wind Energy Projects: A Real Options Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-38, May.
    15. Wang, Xuefei & Zeng, Xiangwu & Li, Xinyao & Li, Jiale, 2019. "Investigation on offshore wind turbine with an innovative hybrid monopile foundation: An experimental based study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 129-141.
    16. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Economic comparison of technological alternatives to harness offshore wind and wave energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1121-1130.
    17. Jijian Lian & Yue Zhao & Chong Lian & Haijun Wang & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Huan Zhou & Junni Jiang, 2018. "Application of an Eddy Current-Tuned Mass Damper to Vibration Mitigation of Offshore Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2016. "Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 866-880.
    19. Hand, Brian & Kelly, Ger & Cashman, Andrew, 2021. "Aerodynamic design and performance parameters of a lift-type vertical axis wind turbine: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Satir, Mert & Murphy, Fionnuala & McDonnell, Kevin, 2018. "Feasibility study of an offshore wind farm in the Aegean Sea, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2552-2562.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hicl.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.