IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ris/prodcs/0043.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Commission, Productivity

    (Productivity Commission)

Abstract

The Productivity Commission was asked to examine the effects of bilateral and regional trade agreements, including on trade and investment barriers, regional integration and Australia's economy generally. The Commission concluded the benefits of these agreements have been oversold and the processes for developing them should be improved. The Commission found that while there is the potential for some gains from preferential agreements, unilateral reform and non-discriminatory trade liberalisation offer larger benefits. While tariff preferences in trade agreements can benefit some industries, the Commission found little evidence that Australia's recent bilateral agreements had provided substantial commercial benefits. The main factors that influence decisions to do business in other countries are likely to lie outside the scope of such agreements. The study concluded that while preferential trade agreements could increase national income, the net effect is likely to be modest. The study also found that some provisions included in Australia's recent preferential trade agreements — including investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms, government procurement requirements, intellectual property protections and provisions affecting areas traditionally the province of domestic policy, such as culture — potentially entail significant costs or risks. To ensure that options other than trade agreements are properly considered, and that any further agreements entered into are warranted, the study recommended that the Government make changes to its trade policy development processes. Under the Commission's proposals, the Government would undertake an annual Trade Policy Review to better identify priorities, enhance the value of consultation and consider trade policy in a broader context. And where there is an interest in pursuing a trade agreement with particular countries, economic assessments should be based on realistic scenarios with any modelling overseen by an independent body. Final assessments to government should be based on the negotiated text of the agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Commission, Productivity, 2010. "Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 43.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:0043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/104203/trade-agreements-report.pdf
    File Function: Full PDF of report
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/trade-agreements/report
    File Function: Publication webpage
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2005. "Review of National Competition Policy Reforms," Inquiry Reports 31898, Productivity Commission.
    2. World Bank, 2005. "Global Economic Prospects 2005 : Trade, Regionalism and Development," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14783, December.
    3. Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, 1998. "The Central American common market: From closed to open regionalism," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 313-322, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Handley, Kyle, 2014. "Exporting under trade policy uncertainty: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 50-66.
    2. -, 2016. "Horizons 2030: Equality at the centre of sustainable development," Documentos de posición del período de sesiones de la Comisión 40160, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Badri Narayanan & Sachin Sharma & Mohammad Razzaque, 2016. "Trade Facilitation in the Commonwealth: An Economic Analysis," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 10(3), pages 305-336, August.
    4. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann, 2015. "Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15889.
    5. Valdés, Raymundo & Tavengwa, Runyowa, 2012. "Intellectual property provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2012-21, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    6. Valdés, Raymundo & McCann, Maegan, 2014. "Intellectual property provisions in regional trade agreements: Revision and update," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2014-14, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    7. Donner Abreu, Maria, 2013. "Preferential rules of origin In regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2013-05, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    8. Chant, Lindsay & Banse, Martin, 2011. "Darwinian pools? The evolution of factor market modelling in global CGE models," Conference papers 332118, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Patricia Ranald, 2015. "The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Reaching behind the border, challenging democracy," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 241-260, June.
    10. -, 2016. "Horizons 2030: Equality at the centre of sustainable development," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 40160 edited by Eclac, September.
    11. Patricia Ranald, 2011. "The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Contradictions in Australia and in the Asia Pacific Region," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 81-98, May.
    12. John Ravenhill, 2012. "The Numbers Game in Asia-Pacific Cooperation," Chapters, in: Christopher M. Dent & Jörn Dosch (ed.), The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Ray Trewin, 2014. "Australian–Indonesian Live Cattle Trade—What Future?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 423-430, May.
    14. Paul Gretton, 2022. "National and Sectoral Effects of a Decline in the Desirability of Investing in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(1), pages 91-121, March.
    15. Thomas Orliac, 2012. "The economics of trade facilitation [L'économie de la facilitation des échanges]," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03681980, HAL.
    16. Malcolm Bosworth & Greg Cutbush & Jenny Corbett, . "Can the World Trade organization be Saved? Only if Australia and Other Members Stop Trashing It," Chapters, in: Yoshifumi Fukunaga & John Riady, Pierre Sauve (ed.), The Road To Bali: ERIA Perspectives on the WTO Ministerial and Asian Integration, chapter 15, pages 167-194, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    17. Vanzetti, David & Setyoko, Nur Rakhman & Ngoc Que, Nguyen & Trewin, Ray, 2011. "A comparison of Indonesian and Vietnamese approaches to agriculture in the ASEAN-China FTA," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 101002, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Bilgehan Karabay, 2017. "Optimal Regulation of Multinationals under Collusion," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1687-1706, August.
    19. Gretton, Paul, 2019. "Introducing more flexible modelling of regional household consumption and saving behaviour into the dynamic GTAP model," Conference papers 333049, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edwards, Geoff W., 2012. "The Desalination Plant, The North-South Pipeline And The Welfare Of Melburnians," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124292, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Patrick Messerlin, 2007. "How Much Further Can the WTO Go? Developed Countries Issues," Working Papers hal-00973103, HAL.
    3. Mohamed Hedi Bchir & Sébastien Jean & David Laborde, 2006. "Binding Overhang and Tariff-Cutting Formulas," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 142(2), pages 207-232, July.
    4. Hester, Annette & Beaulieu, Eugene, 2000. "Trade Agreements in the Americas: Regionalism Converging to Globalization," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 1(2), pages 1-15.
    5. Agata Antkiewicz & John Whalley, 2006. "BRICSAM and the non–WTO," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 237-261, September.
    6. Jaime MELO DE, 2005. "Regionalism and Developing Countries: A Primer," Working Papers 200510, CERDI.
    7. Becker, Sascha O. & Pfaff, Steven & Rubin, Jared, 2016. "Causes and consequences of the Protestant Reformation," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-25.
    8. Lofgren, Hans & Diaz-Bonilla, Carolina, 2006. "Economywide Simulations of Ethiopian MDG Strategies," Conference papers 331488, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2008. "Asian Growth and Trade Poles: India, China, and East and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 210-234, February.
    10. Harry Bowen & Haris Munandar & Jean-Marie Viaene, 2010. "How integrated is the world economy?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 146(3), pages 389-414, September.
    11. Patrick Messerlin, 2010. "Climate change and trade policy: From mutual destruction to mutual support," Working Papers hal-00972994, HAL.
    12. Zhai, Fan, 2010. "The Benefits of Regional Infrastructure Investment in Asia: A Quantitative Exploration," ADBI Working Papers 223, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    13. Arashiro, Zuleika & Goldbaum, Sergio & Lima, Maria Lúcia Labate Mantovanini Pádua & Lima, Ieda Miyuki Koshi Dias De & Pedrossian Neto, Pedro, 2005. "Regional trade agreements and the world trade organization," Textos para discussão 146, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    14. Meenal Shrivastava, 2008. "South Africa in the Contemporary International Economy," South Asian Survey, , vol. 15(1), pages 121-142, January.
    15. repec:tsy:journl:journl_tsy_er_2014_2_4 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Lord, Montague, 2005. "Economic Growth in Uzbekistan: Sources and Potential," MPRA Paper 50731, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8226 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Vincent Vicard, 2009. "On trade creation and regional trade agreements: does depth matter?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(2), pages 167-187, July.
    19. Commission, Productivity, 2010. "Australia’s Anti-dumping and Countervailing System," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 48.
    20. Rod Falvey & Neil Foster-McGregor, 2022. "The breadth of preferential trade agreements and the margins of exports," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(1), pages 181-251, February.
    21. Patrick Messerlin, 2010. "Climate change and trade policy: From mutual destruction to mutual support," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqi, Sciences Po.
    22. L, lakshmanan & S, Chinngaihlian & Raj, Rajesh, 2007. "Competitiveness of India's Manufacturing Sector: An Assessment of Related Issues," MPRA Paper 9801, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Jan 2008.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bilateral trade; regional trade; trade liberalisation; investment barriers; trade barriers; bilateral agreements; tariff reductions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
    • P45 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - International Linkages
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:0043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MAPS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pcgovau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.