IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/coecre/v18y2015i2p139-160n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Supervisory Board And Management And Their Communication Processes In Publicly Listed Companies In Poland / Relacje Między Radą Nadzorczą I Zarządem Oraz Proces Ich Komunikacji W Praktyce Spółek Publicznych W Polsce

Author

Listed:
  • Gad Jacek

    (University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Department of Accounting)

Abstract

Celem głównym niniejszego opracowania jest prezentacja wyników badania empirycznego dotyczącego działalności rad nadzorczych w praktyce spółek notowanych na GPW. Przedmiotem szczególnego zainteresowania w ramach niniejszego artykułu są dwa główne obszary badawcze: charakter relacji między radą nadzorczą i zarządem oraz sposoby i narzędzia komunikacji między tymi organami spółki. W artykule zaprezentowano różne koncepcje teoretyczne dotyczące zadań rad nadzorczych oraz relacji między radą nadzorczą i zarządem. Co więcej, w artykule wskazano zmiany legislacyjne, które zdaniem autora, miały największy wpływ na funkcjonowanie rad nadzorczych w praktyce spółek notowanych na GPW. Prezentowane w niniejszym artykule wnioski sformułowane zostały na podstawie studiów literaturowych, analizy regulacji oraz wywiadu kwestionariuszowego dokonanego wśród rad nadzorczych na przestrzeni września i listopada 2011 r. (techniką gromadzenia danych była ankieta pocztowa).

Suggested Citation

  • Gad Jacek, 2015. "The Relationship Between Supervisory Board And Management And Their Communication Processes In Publicly Listed Companies In Poland / Relacje Między Radą Nadzorczą I Zarządem Oraz Proces Ich Komunikacj," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 139-160, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:coecre:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:139-160:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/cer-2015-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2015-0016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cer-2015-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Johanson, 2008. "Corporate governance and board accounts: exploring a neglected interface between boards of directors and management," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(4), pages 343-380, November.
    2. Martin Hilb, 2005. "New Corporate Governance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-26696-9, June.
    3. Levrau, A. & Van den Berghe, L.A.A., 2006. "Corporate governance and board effectiveness : beyond formalism," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2007-3, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    4. Christine Mallin, 2002. "The Relationship between Corporate Governance, Transparency and Financial Disclosure," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(4), pages 253-255, October.
    5. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lippert, Inge, 2008. "Perspektivenverschiebungen in der Corporate Governance: Neuere Ansätze und Studien der Corporate-Governance-Forschung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, June.
    3. Verica Babić & Jelena Nikolić & Jelena Erić, 2011. "Rethinking Board Roles Performance: Towards Integrative Model," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 56(190), pages 140-162, July – Se.
    4. Adegbite, Emmanuel, 2015. "Good corporate governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, propositions and peculiarities," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 319-330.
    5. Niamh Brennan & Collette E. Kirwan & John Redmond, 2016. "Accountability Processes in Boardrooms: A Conceptual Model of Manager-Non-Executive Director Information Asymmetry," Open Access publications 10197/7652, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    6. Roberto Maglio & Andrea Rey & Francesco Agliata & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "Exploring sustainable governance: Compliance with the Italian related party transactions regulation for the legal protection of minority shareholders," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 272-282, January.
    7. Wang Wenge, 2018. "Board Independence of Listed Companies in the US and China," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Boubaker, Sabri & Brinette, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2021. "Board feminization and innovation through corporate venture capital investments: The moderating effects of independence and management skills," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    9. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Baarda, James R., 2003. "Current Law & Economics Debates: Tools for Assessing Fundamental Cooperative Changes?," 2003 Annual Meeting, October 29 31802, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    11. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    12. Cécile Cézanne, 2012. "Berle and Means," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Brickley, James A. & Linck, James S. & Coles, Jeffrey L., 1999. "What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 341-377, June.
    14. Tom Coupé & Valérie Smeets & Frédéric Warzynski, 2006. "Incentives, Sorting and Productivity along the Career: Evidence from a Sample of Top Economists," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 137-167, April.
    15. William S. Schulze & Michael H. Lubatkin & Richard N. Dino, 2002. "Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 247-259.
    16. Dirk Sliwka, 2001. "On the Costs and Benefits of Delegation in Organizations," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 157(4), pages 568-590, December.
    17. Jörn Hendrich Block & Andreas Thams, 2007. "Long-Term Orientation In Family And Non-Family Firms: A Bayesian Analysis," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2007-059, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    18. Charlie Weir & Oleksandr Talavera & Alexander Muravyev, 2011. "The Return on Human Capital: the Case of UK Non-executive Directors that are also Executive Directors," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 029, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    19. Etienne Redor & Magnus Blomkvist, 2021. "Do all inside and affiliated directors hold the same value for shareholders?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 882-895.
    20. Agnès Labye & Christine Lagoutte & Françoise Renversez, 2002. "Banques mutualistes et systèmes financiers : une analyse comparative Allemagne, Grande-Bretagne, France," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 67(3), pages 85-109.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:coecre:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:139-160:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.