IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ukm/jlekon/v48y2014i2p83-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuel Subsidy Rationalisation: The Perils of the Middle Class in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Hakim, Roslan

    (Graduate School of Business Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman MALAYSIA)

  • Abdullah, Othman Yeop

    (Graduate School of Business Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman MALAYSIA)

  • Ismail, Russayani binti

    (School of Economics Finance and Banking Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman MALAYSIA)

  • Abdul Razak, Nor Azam

    (School of Economics Finance and Banking Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman MALAYSIA)

Abstract

The middle-class is reported to experience the “middle-class squeeze†, where they are facing a declining relative income and simultaneously rising costs of living particularly with regards to housing, education and health care. Besides, the middle-class is also reported to face “the middle-class trap†, where on the one hand, they are regarded as “too rich†to qualify for any government support, but on the other hand, they found themselves in reality “not too rich†to sustain their lives without facing hardships. These observations unfortunately seem to be equally true in Malaysia, which raises the need to scrutinise the likely impact of government policy on the middle-class. With the recent fuel subsidy rationalisation in Malaysia, this paper attempts to analyse the likely welfare impact of this policy towards the middle-class in the Malaysian society. Examining this issue is crucial and desirable since the problems faced by the middle-class tend to be overlooked by the policy makers. In our analysis, we use various definitions of “middle-class†as suggested in the literature, and examine the direct, indirect and the total welfare effects of fuel subsidy removal on them using data from the Household Expenditure Survey (HES) 2004/2005 as well as the Input-Output Table for 2004/2005. Our findings reveal that, in line with the common perception, the benefits of fuel subsidy accrued mostly to the rich. Ironically, the costs of subsidy removal are borne mostly by the middle-class in terms of the direct welfare effect. Yet in terms of the indirect welfare effect, the costs of subsidy removal are borne equally by the middle-class as well as the lower and the upper class. Since the indirect welfare effect outweighs the direct welfare effect, we conclude that while the rich get most of the benefits from fuel subsidy, its removal hurts the middle-class the most. Our finding implies that fuel subsidy rationalisation must be followed by a practical strategy and program to lessen the negative impact of fuel subsidy removal not only for the poor, but also for the middle-class as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Hakim, Roslan & Abdullah, Othman Yeop & Ismail, Russayani binti & Abdul Razak, Nor Azam, 2014. "Fuel Subsidy Rationalisation: The Perils of the Middle Class in Malaysia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 48(2), pages 83-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:ukm:jlekon:v:48:y:2014:i:2:p:83-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ukm.my/jem/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/jeko_482-8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birdsall, N. & Graham, C. & Pettinato, S., 2000. "Stuck in the Tunnel: Is Globalization Muddling the Middle Class?," Papers 14, Brookings Institution - Working Papers.
    2. Michael C. Wolfson, 1997. "Divergent Inequalities: Theory And Empirical Results," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 43(4), pages 401-421, December.
    3. Wolfson, Michael C, 1994. "When Inequalities Diverge," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 353-358, May.
    4. Jenkins, Stephen P., 1995. "Did the middle class shrink during the 1980s? UK evidence from kernel density estimates," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 407-413, October.
    5. Easterly, William, 2001. "The Middle Class Consensus and Economic Development," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 317-335, December.
    6. Levy, Frank & Murnane, Richard J, 1992. "U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 1333-1381, September.
    7. Mr. Daniel Leigh & Moataz El-Said, 2006. "Fuel Price Subsidies in Gabon: Fiscal Cost and Distributional Impact," IMF Working Papers 2006/243, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Wolfson, Michael C, 1997. "Divergent Inequalities: Theory and Empirical Results," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 43(4), pages 401-421, December.
    9. Mr. David Coady & Mr. Javier Arze del Granado, 2010. "The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies: A Review of Evidence for Developing Countries," IMF Working Papers 2010/202, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying, Loo Sze & Harun, Mukaramah, 2019. "Responses of Firms and Households to Government Expenditure in Malaysia: Evidence for the Fuel Subsidy Withdrawal," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 53(2), pages 29-39.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. Clementi & A. L. Dabalen & V. Molini & F. Schettino, 2017. "When the Centre Cannot Hold: Patterns of Polarization in Nigeria," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(4), pages 608-632, December.
    2. Fabio Clementi & Francesco Schettino, 2013. "Income polarization in Brazil, 2001-2011: A distributional analysis using PNAD data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(3), pages 1796-1815.
    3. Ravallion, Martin, 2010. "The Developing World's Bulging (but Vulnerable) Middle Class," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 445-454, April.
    4. Chiara Assunta Ricci & Sergio Scicchitano, 2021. "Decomposing changes in income polarization by population group: what happened during the crisis?," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(1), pages 235-259, April.
    5. Joon-Woo Nahm, 2008. "Shrinking Middle Class and Changing Income Distribution of Korea: 1995-2005," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 24, pages 345-365.
    6. Peter Lambert, 2010. "James Foster and Michael Wolfson’s 1992 paper “Polarization and the decline of the middle class”," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(2), pages 241-245, June.
    7. Schettino, Francesco & Khan, Haider A., 2020. "Income polarization in the USA: What happened to the middle class in the last few decades?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 149-161.
    8. Ma Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ana Urrutia & Henar Díez, 2010. "Unit Consistency And Bipolarization Of Income Distributions," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(1), pages 65-83, March.
    9. Clementi,F. & Fabiani,M. & Molini,V., 2018. "The devil is in the details : growth, polarization, and poverty reduction in Africa in the past two decades," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8494, The World Bank.
    10. Martyna Kobus, 2014. "On the measurement of polarization for ordinal data," Working Papers 325, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    11. Martyna Kobus, 2015. "Polarization measurement for ordinal data," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 13(2), pages 275-297, June.
    12. Seshanna, Shubhasree & Decornez, Stephane, 2003. "Income polarization and inequality across countries: an empirical study," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 335-358, June.
    13. Ricci, Chiara Assunta & Scicchitano, Sergio, 2021. "The role of Great Recession on income polarization by population groups," GLO Discussion Paper Series 766, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Costantini, Valeria & Monni, Salvatore, 2009. "Gender disparities in the Italian regions from a human development perspective," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 256-269, March.
    15. Ines Bouassida & AbdelRahmen El Lahga, 2010. "Household Expenditure Polarization: Evidence from The Arab Region," Working Papers 559, Economic Research Forum, revised 10 Jan 2010.
    16. Clementi, Fabio & Molini, Vasco & Schettino, Francesco, 2018. "All that Glitters is not Gold: Polarization Amid Poverty Reduction in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 275-291.
    17. Gornig, Martin & Goebel, Jan, 2018. "Deindustrialisation and the polarisation of household incomes: The example of urban agglomerations in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 790-806.
    18. Fedorov, Leonid, 2002. "Regional Inequality and Regional Polarization in Russia, 1990-99," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 443-456, March.
    19. Roberto Ezcurra, 2009. "Does Income Polarization Affect Economic Growth? The Case of the European Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 267-285.
    20. Joan Esteban & Debraj Ray, 2005. "A Comparison of Polarization Measures," Working Papers 310, Barcelona School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ukm:jlekon:v:48:y:2014:i:2:p:83-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Asri Abd Ghani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feukmmy.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.