IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v154y2021i2d10.1007_s11205-020-02553-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government’s Economic Performance Fosters Trust in Government in China: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Respect for Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Yang

    (Chongqing University)

  • Chaohua Dong

    (Chongqing University)

  • Yongjin Chen

    (Chongqing University)

Abstract

The high level of trust in government in China has been attributed to the Chinese government’s success in economic development. However, the increased public demand in China in recent years has made the public less likely to focus on the government’s economic performance, which inspired us to explore the correlation between government’s economic performance and trust in government. Based on the Asian Barometer Survey, this study examines the relationship between the government’s economic performance and trust in government in China. The findings suggest that good economic performance by the government was positively associated with a high level of trust in government. High respect for authority was not only positively associated with trust in government but also weakened the relationship between the government’s economic performance and trust in government. This study provides evidence that although the conventional concept of respect for authority may positively predict trust in government, it will weaken the effects of good economic performance by the government on trust in government. The results provide reference for governments in contexts similar to that in China seeking to improve their reputations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Yang & Chaohua Dong & Yongjin Chen, 2021. "Government’s Economic Performance Fosters Trust in Government in China: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Respect for Authority," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 545-558, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:154:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-020-02553-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02553-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-020-02553-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-020-02553-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Elaine M. & Meng, Juanjuan & Wang, Joseph Tao-yi, 2014. "Confucianism and preferences: Evidence from lab experiments in Taiwan and China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 106-122.
    2. Hakhverdian, Armen & Mayne, Quinton, 2012. "Institutional Trust, Education, and Corruption: A Micro-Macro Interactive Approach," Scholarly Articles 9639965, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    3. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    4. Rong Hu & Ivan Y. Sun & Yuning Wu, 2015. "Chinese Trust in the Police: The Impact of Political Efficacy and Participation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1012-1026, December.
    5. Wu, Sarah Jinhui & Zhang, Dongli, 2013. "Analyzing the effectiveness of quality management practices in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 281-289.
    6. Edlund, Jonas & Lindh, Arvid, 2013. "Institutional trust and welfare state support: on the role of trust in market institutions," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 295-317, December.
    7. Kim, Sungmoon, 2015. "Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(1), pages 187-200, February.
    8. Xianwen Kuang, 2020. "Self-Caging or Playing With the Edge? News Selection Autonomy in Authoritarian China," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    9. Zhang, Gang & Bai, Yuntao & Caza, Arran & Wang, Lu, 2014. "Leader Integrity and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in China," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 299-319, July.
    10. Kung, James Kai-sing & Ma, Chicheng, 2014. "Can cultural norms reduce conflicts? Confucianism and peasant rebellions in Qing China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 132-149.
    11. Gang Zhang & Yuntao Bai & Arran Caza & Lu Wang, 2014. "Leader Integrity and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in China. 中国领导者的正直品格对组织公民行为之影响," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 10(2), pages 299-319, July.
    12. Sharon G. M. Koh & Grace H. Y. Lee & Eduard J. Bomhoff, 2020. "The income inequality, financial depth and economic growth nexus in China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 412-427, February.
    13. Ching-Hsing Wang, 2016. "Government Performance, Corruption, and Political Trust in East Asia," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 97(2), pages 211-231, June.
    14. Ziqiang Han & Kai Lin & Peng Tao, 2019. "Perceived Quality of Governance and Trust in Government in Rural China: A Comparison Between Villagers and Officials," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1726-1743, August.
    15. Laufer, Daniel & Garrett, Tony C. & Ning, Bo, 2018. "The Moderating Role of Power Distance on the Reaction of Consumers to the CEO as a Spokesperson During a Product Harm Crisis: Insights From China and South Korea," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 215-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaona Xie & Tingting Wu & Yue Zhang & Yongyu Guo, 2021. "Socioeconomic Status and COVID-19-Related Psychological Panic in China: The Role of Trust in Government and Authoritarian Personality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Walle, Yabibal Mulualem, 2022. "Determinants of social cohesion: Cross-country evidence," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Kuiyun Zhi & Qiurong Tan & Si Chen & Yongjin Chen & Xiaoqin Wu & Chenkai Xue & Anbang Song, 2022. "How Does Social Security Fairness Predict Trust in Government? The Serial Mediation Effects of Social Security Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Chunhua Luo & Dianlong Wei & Wunhong Su & Jinjing Lu, 2023. "Association between Regional Digitalization and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabella Mingo & Maria Paola Faggiano, 2020. "Trust in Institutions Between Objective and Subjective Determinants: A Multilevel Analysis in European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 815-839, October.
    2. Cuiping Ma & Jibao Gu & Hefu Liu, 0. "Entrepreneurs’ passion and new venture performance in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-26.
    3. Hyo Sun Jung & Kyung Hwa Seo & Hye Hyun Yoon, 2020. "The Importance of Leader Integrity on Family Restaurant Employees’ Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Exploring Sustainability of Employees’ Generational Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Fang, Guanfu & Gao, Tiantian & He, Huanlang & Sun, Qian, 2023. "Public credit information arrangements and entrepreneurship: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Arran Caza & Brianna B. Caza & Barry Z. Posner, 2021. "Transformational Leadership across Cultures: Follower Perception and Satisfaction," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, March.
    6. George, Charles & Gibson, Cristina B. & Barbour, Jennifer, 2022. "Shared leadership across cultures: Do traditionalism and virtuality matter?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    7. Jiang, Shuguang & Wei, Qian, 2022. "Confucian culture, moral reminder, and soft corruption," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Cuiping Ma & Jibao Gu & Hefu Liu, 2017. "Entrepreneurs’ passion and new venture performance in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1043-1068, December.
    9. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Pan Zhang & Zhiguo Wang, 2019. "PM 2.5 Concentrations and Subjective Well-Being: Longitudinal Evidence from Aggregated Panel Data from Chinese Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Lan Guo & Ling Yang, 2023. "The Corporate Economic Influence and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Malkina, Marina Yu. & Ovchinnikov, Vyacheslav N. & Kholodilin, Konstantin A., 2020. "Институциональные Факторы Политического Доверия В Современной России [Institutional Factors Influencing Political Trust in Modern Russia]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 77-93.
    13. Xie, Dongshui & Bai, Caiquan & Zhang, Yuwei, 2023. "Relation-based governance, financial crisis shock, and economic growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    14. Focacci, Chiara Natalie & Kovac, Mitja & Spruk, Rok, 2023. "Ethnolinguistic diversity, quality of local public institutions, and firm-level innovation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Filipiak, Ute, 2016. "Trusting financial institutions: Out of reach, out of trust?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 200-214.
    16. T. W. G. Meer & E. Ouattara, 2019. "Putting ‘political’ back in political trust: an IRT test of the unidimensionality and cross-national equivalence of political trust measures," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 2983-3002, November.
    17. Miao, Meng & Niu, Guanjie & Noe, Thomas, 2021. "Contracting without contracting institutions: The trusted assistant loan in 19th century China," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 987-1007.
    18. Meral Ugur-Cinar & Kursat Cinar & Tekin Kose, 2020. "How Does Education Affect Political Trust?: An Analysis of Moderating Factors," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 779-808, November.
    19. Boxell, Levi, 2019. "Droughts, conflict, and the African slave trade," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 774-791.
    20. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz & Beltrán-Martín, Inmaculada, 2018. "The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:154:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-020-02553-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.