IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jecstr/v7y2018i1d10.1186_s40008-018-0111-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Difficulties and remedies on DEA environmental assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Toshiyuki Sueyoshi

    (New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology)

  • Mika Goto

    (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

Abstract

This study discusses a DEA approach for environmental assessment. The proposed approach examines a level of simultaneous achievement on economic prosperity and environmental protection, so measuring the level of “sustainability.” DEA, standing for Data Envelopment Analysis, has been widely applied for performance assessment in the past five decades. A new type of methodology is referred to as “DEA environmental assessment,” and it measures the performance of various organizations that use inputs to produce not only desirable outputs (e.g., electricity) but also undesirable outputs (e.g., CO2 emission). In this study, we discuss various methodological concerns by considering theoretical and empirical difficulties related to the use of DEA environmental assessment. These difficulties include (a) how to incorporate two separated (natural and managerial) disposability concepts into a unified framework of DEA environmental assessment, (b) how to reorganize unified disposability concepts in the proposed approach, (c) how to incorporate an occurrence of undesirable congestion (e.g., a line capacity limit on transmission) and desirable congestion (e.g., possible occurrence of green technology innovation) and (d) how to manage a data set that contains zero and negative values. It is easily expected that these explorations enhance the practicality of DEA environmental assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Mika Goto, 2018. "Difficulties and remedies on DEA environmental assessment," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:7:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-018-0111-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s40008-018-0111-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40008-018-0111-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40008-018-0111-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan & Goto, Mika, 2017. "A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 104-124.
    2. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Mika Goto, 2017. "World trend in energy: an extension to DEA applied to energy and environment," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Yan Yuan, 2018. "Measuring energy usage and sustainability development in Asian nations by DEA intermediate approach," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Wang, Wei-Kang & Lu, Wen-Min & Kweh, Qian Long & Lai, Hsiao-Wen, 2014. "Does corporate social responsibility influence the corporate performance of the U.S. telecommunications industry?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 580-591.
    5. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika & Omi, Yusuke, 2010. "Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing industries after the lost decade," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 724-736, June.
    6. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi, 2017. "Damages to return with a possible occurrence of eco-technology innovation measured by DEA environmental assessment," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Fu-Chiang Yang, 2017. "Integrating corporate social responsibility and profitability into best practice selection: the case of large Taiwanese firms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1493-1512, July.
    8. Donald Vitaliano & Gregory Stella, 2006. "The cost of Corporate Social Responsibility: the case of the Community Reinvestment Act," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 235-244, December.
    9. Constantin Belu, 2009. "Ranking corporations based on sustainable and socially responsible practices. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 257-268.
    10. Abagail McWilliams & Annaleena Parhankangas & Jason Coupet & Eric Welch & Darold T. Barnum, 2016. "Strategic Decision Making for the Triple Bottom Line," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 193-204, March.
    11. Berber, Philip & Brockett, Patrick L. & Cooper, William W. & Golden, Linda L. & Parker, Barnett R., 2011. "Efficiency in fundraising and distributions to cause-related social profit enterprises," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1-9, March.
    12. Shou-Lin Yang, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and an enterprise’s operational efficiency: considering competitor’s strategies and the perspectives of long-term engagement," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2553-2569, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filip Fidanoski & Kiril Simeonovski & Violeta Cvetkoska, 2021. "Energy Efficiency in OECD Countries: A DEA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Zhao, Laijun & Li, Deqiang & Guo, Xiaopeng & Xue, Jian & Wang, Chenchen & Sun, Wenjun, 2021. "Cooperation risk of oil and gas resources between China and the countries along the Belt and Road," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mika Goto & Toshiyuki Sueyoshi, 2020. "Sustainable development and corporate social responsibility in Japanese manufacturing companies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 844-856, July.
    2. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Youngbok Ryu, 2020. "Performance Assessment of the Semiconductor Industry: Measured by DEA Environmental Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Magdalena Kapelko & Alfons Oude Lansink & Encarna Guillamon‐Saorin, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and dynamic productivity change in the US food and beverage manufacturing industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 286-305, April.
    4. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Mika Goto, 2019. "DEA Non-Radial Approach for Resource Allocation and Energy Usage to Enhance Corporate Sustainability in Japanese Manufacturing Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Fei Mo & Derek Wang, 2019. "Environmental Sustainability of Road Transport in OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Xuetong Wang & Wenyong Lai & Xiangnan Song & Chen Lu, 2018. "Implementation Efficiency of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Construction Industry: A China Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2018. "Resource utilization for sustainability enhancement in Japanese industries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2308-2320.
    8. Harpinder Sandhu, 2021. "Bottom-Up Transformation of Agriculture and Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2019. "The intermediate approach to sustainability enhancement and scale-related measures in environmental assessment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 744-756.
    10. Shogo Eguchi & Hirotaka Takayabu & Mitsuki Kaneko & Shigemi Kagawa & Shunichi Hienuki, 2021. "Proposing effective strategies for meeting an environmental regulation with attainable technology improvement targets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2907-2921, November.
    11. Jie Liu & Chunhui Yuan & Xiaolong Li, 2019. "The Environmental Assessment on Chinese Logistics Enterprises Based on Non-Radial DEA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Xiaochun Zhao & Huixin Xu & Qun Sun, 2022. "Research on China’s Carbon Emission Efficiency and Its Regional Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Talat S. Genc & Stephen Kosempel, 2023. "Energy Transition and the Economy: A Review Article," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Mika Goto, 2021. "Performance Assessment of Japanese Electricity and Gas Companies during 2002–2018: Three DEA Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Zhang, Lin & Zhao, Linlin & Zha, Yong, 2021. "Efficiency evaluation of Chinese regional industrial systems using a dynamic two-stage DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Encarna Guillamon-Saorin & Magdalena Kapelko & Spiro E. Stefanou, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Operational Inefficiency: A Dynamic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    17. Atris, Amani Mohammed & Goto, Mika, 2019. "Vertical structure and efficiency assessment of the US oil and gas companies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Jean-Michel Sahuta & Sandrine Boulerne & Medhi Mili & Frédéric Teulon, 2014. "What Relation Exists Between Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) And Longevity Of Firms?," Working Papers 2014-248, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    19. Badunenko, Oleg & Galeotti, Marzio & Hunt, Lester C., 2021. "Better to grow or better to improve? Measuring environmental efficiency in OECD countries with a Stochastic Environmental Kuznets Frontier," FEEM Working Papers 316226, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    20. Samet Güner & Erman Coşkun, 2016. "Determining the best performing benchmarks for transit routes with a multi-objective model: the implementation and a critique of the two-model approach," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 205-224, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:7:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-018-0111-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.