IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v28y2019i4d10.1007_s10726-019-09617-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Staff Scheduling with Theory of Coalition

Author

Listed:
  • Oğuzhan Ahmet Arık

    (Nuh Naci Yazgan University)

  • Erkan Köse

    (Nuh Naci Yazgan University)

  • Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest

    (Slippery Rock University)

Abstract

Project scheduling has been still one of the hottest topics in the management area. The goal of traditional project management is to complete the project at the earliest possible time in accordance with the available resources without violating priority relations of the activities involved. Unlike traditional project management, this study deals with the possibility of a coalition among the staff available to accomplish tasks of the project. The tasks can be fulfilled by more than one staff members. Staff’s coalition shortens the completion time of the tasks. A natural problem that arises in this case is how to share the income generated. The other side of the problem is concerned with the project owner who wants the project to be completed as early as possible. In this study, a mathematical model proposal is dealt with in order to realize the goals of both the project owner and the staffs as much as possible within the complex structure of the situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Oğuzhan Ahmet Arık & Erkan Köse & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2019. "Project Staff Scheduling with Theory of Coalition," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 827-847, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:28:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-019-09617-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-019-09617-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-019-09617-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-019-09617-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vahid Roshanaei & Curtiss Luong & Dionne M. Aleman & David R. Urbach, 2017. "Collaborative Operating Room Planning and Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 558-580, August.
    2. Fanyong Meng & Qiang Zhang & Xiaohong Chen, 2017. "Fuzzy Multichoice Games with Fuzzy Characteristic Functions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 565-595, May.
    3. Cyril Briand & Sandra Ulrich Ngueveu & Přemysl Šůcha, 2017. "Finding an optimal Nash equilibrium to the multi-agent project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 475-491, October.
    4. Antonio Magaña & Francesc Carreras, 2018. "Coalition Formation and Stability," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 467-502, June.
    5. Carreras, Francesc & Puente, María Albina, 2015. "Coalitional multinomial probabilistic values," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 236-246.
    6. Francesc Carreras & María Albina Puente, 2015. "Multinomial Probabilistic Values," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 981-991, November.
    7. Lizhong Wang & Liping Fang & Keith W. Hipel, 2011. "Negotiation over Costs and Benefits in Brownfield Redevelopment," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 509-524, July.
    8. Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2010. "The Hoede–Bakker Index Modified to the Shapley–Shubik and Holler–Packel Indices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 543-569, November.
    9. Francesc Carreras & María Albina Puente, 2012. "Symmetric Coalitional Binomial Semivalues," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 637-662, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Šůcha, Přemysl & Agnetis, Alessandro & Šidlovský, Marko & Briand, Cyril, 2021. "Nash equilibrium solutions in multi-agent project scheduling with milestones," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 29-41.
    2. Boyang Dai & Xiangfeng Yang & Xiaoyue Liu, 2022. "Shapley Value of Uncertain Coalitional Game based on Hurwicz Criterion with Application to Water Resource Allocation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 241-260, February.
    3. Jia-Cai Liu & Deng-Feng Li, 2022. "Improved Shapley Values Based on Players’ Least Square Contributions and Their Applications in the Collaborative Profit Sharing of the Rural E-commerce," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 7-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Magaña & Francesc Carreras, 2018. "Coalition Formation and Stability," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 467-502, June.
    2. Albizuri, M.J. & Goikoetxea, A., 2022. "Probabilistic Owen-Shapley spatial power indices," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 524-541.
    3. Benati, Stefano & López-Blázquez, Fernando & Puerto, Justo, 2019. "A stochastic approach to approximate values in cooperative games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 93-106.
    4. J. C. Gonçalves-Dosantos & I. García-Jurado & J. Costa & J. M. Alonso-Meijide, 2022. "Necessary players and values," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 935-961, November.
    5. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Coker, Alexander D., 2018. "Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 278-296.
    6. Green, T.L., 2018. "Evaluating predictors for brownfield redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 299-319.
    7. Francesc Carreras & María Albina Puente, 2015. "Multinomial Probabilistic Values," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 981-991, November.
    8. M. J. Albizuri & A. Goikoetxea, 2021. "The Owen–Shapley Spatial Power Index in Three-Dimensional Space," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1027-1055, October.
    9. Roshanaei, Vahid & Booth, Kyle E.C. & Aleman, Dionne M. & Urbach, David R. & Beck, J. Christopher, 2020. "Branch-and-check methods for multi-level operating room planning and scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Maurice Koster & Sascha Kurz & Ines Lindner & Stefan Napel, 2017. "The prediction value," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 433-460, February.
    11. Hassan Zohali & Bahman Naderi & Vahid Roshanaei, 2022. "Solving the Type-2 Assembly Line Balancing with Setups Using Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 315-332, January.
    12. Šůcha, Přemysl & Agnetis, Alessandro & Šidlovský, Marko & Briand, Cyril, 2021. "Nash equilibrium solutions in multi-agent project scheduling with milestones," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 29-41.
    13. Ricardo J. G. Mateus & João C. Bana e Costa & Pedro Verga Matos, 2017. "Supporting Multicriteria Group Decisions with MACBETH Tools: Selection of Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment Actions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 495-521, May.
    14. Alessandro Agnetis & Cyril Briand & Sandra Ulrich Ngueveu & Přemysl Šůcha, 2020. "Price of anarchy and price of stability in multi-agent project scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 97-119, February.
    15. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    16. Jamal Ouenniche & Aristotelis Boukouras & Mohammad Rajabi, 2016. "An Ordinal Game Theory Approach to the Analysis and Selection of Partners in Public–Private Partnership Projects," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 314-343, April.
    17. Julian Schiele & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2021. "Predicting intensive care unit bed occupancy for integrated operating room scheduling via neural networks," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 65-88, February.
    18. Francesc Carreras & María Albina Puente, 2022. "On the axiomatic characterization of the coalitional multinomial probabilistic values," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 119-151, April.
    19. J. C. Gonçalves-Dosantos & I. García-Jurado & J. Costa, 2020. "Sharing delay costs in stochastic scheduling problems with delays," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 457-476, December.
    20. Francesc Carreras & María Albina Puente, 2018. "A note on multinomial probabilistic values," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(1), pages 164-186, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:28:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-019-09617-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.