IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v269y2018i1d10.1007_s10479-017-2515-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-agent-based single-machine scheduling with switchover time to minimize total weighted completion time and makespan objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Shesh Narayan Sahu

    (National Institute of Technology, Agartala)

  • Yuvraj Gajpal

    (University of Manitoba)

  • Swapan Debbarma

    (National Institute of Technology, Agartala)

Abstract

We consider a single-machine scheduling problem with two-agents, each with a set of non-pre-emptive jobs, where two agents compete for the use of a single processing resource. A switchover time arises whenever a job of one agent is processed after a job of another agent. Each agent wants to minimize a certain objective function, which depends upon the completion time and switchover time of their own jobs only. This paper considers the minimization of total weighted completion time of the first agent subject to an upper bound on the makespan of the second agent. We introduce some properties to the problem. The properties describe the structure of an optimal solution which is being used for developing an optimal algorithm. We propose an optimal algorithm, a simple heuristic algorithm, and a particle-swarm-based meta heuristic algorithm to solve the problem. The heuristic algorithm is based on the weighted shortest process time-first rule. The performances of the heuristic and particle swarm algorithms are evaluated on randomly generated problem instances. We perform the numerical analysis to reveal the properties of the proposed problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Shesh Narayan Sahu & Yuvraj Gajpal & Swapan Debbarma, 2018. "Two-agent-based single-machine scheduling with switchover time to minimize total weighted completion time and makespan objectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 623-640, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:269:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2515-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2515-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-017-2515-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-017-2515-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, Shuenn-Ren & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Du-Juan & Wu, Chin-Chia, 2016. "Just-in-time scheduling with two competing agents on unrelated parallel machines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 41-47.
    2. Jun Pei & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang, 2017. "Scheduling deteriorating jobs on a single serial-batching machine with multiple job types and sequence-dependent setup times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 175-195, February.
    3. Alessandro Agnetis & Dario Pacciarelli & Andrea Pacifici, 2007. "Multi-agent single machine scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 3-15, March.
    4. S Gawiejnowicz & W-C Lee & C-L Lin & C-C Wu, 2011. "Single-machine scheduling of proportionally deteriorating jobs by two agents," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(11), pages 1983-1991, November.
    5. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    6. B Mor & G Mosheiov, 2014. "Polynomial time solutions for scheduling problems on a proportionate flowshop with two competing agents," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(1), pages 151-157, January.
    7. Tasgetiren, M. Fatih & Liang, Yun-Chia & Sevkli, Mehmet & Gencyilmaz, Gunes, 2007. "A particle swarm optimization algorithm for makespan and total flowtime minimization in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1930-1947, March.
    8. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2011. "Single machine batch scheduling with two competing agents to minimize total flowtime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 524-531, December.
    9. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2010. "Scheduling problems with two competing agents to minimize minmax and minsum earliness measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 540-546, November.
    10. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2010. "Competitive Two-Agent Scheduling and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 458-469, April.
    11. S Gawiejnowicz & W-C Lee & C-L Lin & C-C Wu, 2011. "Single-machine scheduling of proportionally deteriorating jobs by two agents," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(11), pages 1983-1991, November.
    12. Donatas Elvikis & Vincent T’kindt, 2014. "Two-agent scheduling on uniform parallel machines with min-max criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 79-94, February.
    13. Yunqiang Yin & Du‐Juan Wang & Chin‐Chia Wu & T.C.E. Cheng, 2016. "CON/SLK due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two agents," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(5), pages 416-429, August.
    14. Jacomine Grobler & Andries Engelbrecht & Schalk Kok & Sarma Yadavalli, 2010. "Metaheuristics for the multi-objective FJSP with sequence-dependent set-up times, auxiliary resources and machine down time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 165-196, November.
    15. Allesandro Agnetis & Pitu B. Mirchandani & Dario Pacciarelli & Andrea Pacifici, 2004. "Scheduling Problems with Two Competing Agents," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 229-242, April.
    16. Wan, Guohua & Vakati, Sudheer R. & Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Pinedo, Michael, 2010. "Scheduling two agents with controllable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 528-539, September.
    17. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    18. Du-Juan Wang & Yunqiang Yin & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & T.C.E. Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu, 2016. "Due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two competing agents," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1152-1169, February.
    19. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    20. Wang, Du-Juan & Yin, Yunqiang & Xu, Jianyou & Wu, Wen-Hsiang & Cheng, Shuenn-Ren & Wu, Chin-Chia, 2015. "Some due date determination scheduling problems with two agents on a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 81-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunqiang Yin & Doudou Li & Dujuan Wang & T. C. E. Cheng, 2021. "Single-machine serial-batch delivery scheduling with two competing agents and due date assignment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 497-523, March.
    2. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.
    3. Jun Pei & Jinling Wei & Baoyu Liao & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Two-agent scheduling on bounded parallel-batching machines with an aging effect of job-position-dependent," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 191-223, November.
    4. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2017. "A two-agent single machine scheduling problem with due-window assignment and a common flow-allowance," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1454-1468, May.
    5. Byung-Gyoo Kim & Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2017. "Two-Machine and Two-Agent Flow Shop with Special Processing Times Structures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(04), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Yunqiang Yin & T. C. E. Cheng & Du-Juan Wang & Chin-Chia Wu, 2017. "Two-agent flowshop scheduling to maximize the weighted number of just-in-time jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 313-335, August.
    7. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    8. Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2020. "Scheduling two projects with controllable processing times in a single-machine environment," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 619-628, October.
    9. Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2016. "An Ordered Flow Shop with Two Agents," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(05), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Yunqiang Yin & Yongjian Yang & Dujuan Wang & T.C.E. Cheng & Chin‐Chia Wu, 2018. "Integrated production, inventory, and batch delivery scheduling with due date assignment and two competing agents," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(5), pages 393-409, August.
    11. Fan, B.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Two-agent scheduling in a flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 376-384.
    12. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen, 2023. "Competitive two-agent scheduling with release dates and preemption on a single machine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 227-249, June.
    13. Yunqiang Yin & Youhua Chen & Kaida Qin & Dujuan Wang, 2019. "Two-agent scheduling on unrelated parallel machines with total completion time and weighted number of tardy jobs criteria," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 315-333, June.
    14. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.
    15. Shisheng Li & T.C.E. Cheng & C.T. Ng & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Two‐agent scheduling on a single sequential and compatible batching machine," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(8), pages 628-641, December.
    16. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2011. "Single machine batch scheduling with two competing agents to minimize total flowtime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 524-531, December.
    17. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    18. Yaodong Ni & Zhaojun Zhao, 2017. "Two-agent scheduling problem under fuzzy environment," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 739-748, March.
    19. Enrique Gerstl & Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2017. "Scheduling with two competing agents to minimize total weighted earliness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 227-245, June.
    20. Yunqiang Yin & Du‐Juan Wang & Chin‐Chia Wu & T.C.E. Cheng, 2016. "CON/SLK due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two agents," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(5), pages 416-429, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:269:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2515-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.