IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v10y2020i3d10.1007_s13162-019-00155-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Garaus

    (Modul University Vienna)

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increasing trend among consumers toward using two or more media simultaneously, a phenomenon known as media multitasking. The majority of the extant literature agrees that media multitasking has detrimental effects on advertising effectiveness. However, opportunities exist for reducing these negative effects or even creating effects favorable to advertising outcomes. Nevertheless, the literature on media multitasking during advertising exposure is highly fragmented and findings are inconclusive. This literature review synthesizes the extant studies on message processing in media multitasking situations. It develops a comprehensive conceptual framework on the effects of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness, with particular attention to mediating processes and moderating variables. The conceptual model explains the circumstances under which individuals devote voluntary or involuntary attention to advertisements during media multitasking, advances knowledge on the role of different sensory modalities, and reveals how the two types of information processing complement each other during simultaneous media usage.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Garaus, 2020. "The influence of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 244-259, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:10:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-019-00155-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-019-00155-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-019-00155-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-019-00155-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alain Samson & Benjamin G. Voyer, 2012. "Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 2(2), pages 48-71, December.
    2. MacKenzie, Scott B, 1986. "The Role of Attention in Mediating the Effect of Advertising on Attribute Importance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 174-195, September.
    3. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Kroeber-Riel, Werner, 1979. "Activation Research: Psychobiological Approaches in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 5(4), pages 240-250, March.
    5. Jura Liaukonyte & Thales Teixeira & Kenneth C. Wilbur, 2015. "Television Advertising and Online Shopping," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 311-330, May.
    6. Pilotta, Joseph J. & Schultz, Don, 2005. "Simultaneous Media Experience and Synesthesia," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 19-26, March.
    7. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    8. Maity, Moutusy & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2018. "The impact of media richness on consumer information search and choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 36-45.
    9. Shiv, Baba & Fedorikhin, Alexander, 2002. "Spontaneous versus Controlled Influences of Stimulus-Based Affect on Choice Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 342-370, March.
    10. Rik Pieters & Luk Warlop & Michel Wedel, 2002. "Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 765-781, June.
    11. Samson, Alain & Voyer, Benjamin G., 2012. "Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 47252, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Gergana Y. Nenkov & Maura L. Scott, 2014. ""So Cute I Could Eat It Up": Priming Effects of Cute Products on Indulgent Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 326-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo & Manzinger, Sandra, 2017. "Happy grocery shopper: The creation of positive emotions through affective digital signage content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-305.
    2. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    3. Eisenbeiss, Maik & Wilken, Robert & Skiera, Bernd & Cornelissen, Markus, 2015. "What makes deal-of-the-day promotions really effective? The interplay of discount and time constraint with product type," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 387-397.
    4. Chen, Xiaomeng & Forman, Christopher & Kummer, Michael E., 2021. "Chat more and contribute better: An empirical study of a knowledge-sharing community," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Sreejesh, S. & Ghosh, Tathagata & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "Moving beyond the content: The role of contextual cues in the effectiveness of gamification of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 88-101.
    6. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Das, Manish & Shah, Dhara & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Deciphering in-store-online switching in multi-channel retailing context: Role of affective commitment to purchase situation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Capelli, Sonia & Thomas, Fanny, 2021. "To look tasty, let's show the ingredients! Effects of ingredient images on implicit tasty–healthy associations for packaged products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Panzone, Luca & Hilton, Denis & Sale, Laura & Cohen, Doron, 2016. "Socio-demographics, implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, and sustainable consumption in supermarket shopping," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 77-95.
    9. Erlandsson, Arvid & Västfjäll, Daniel & Sundfelt, Oskar & Slovic, Paul, 2016. "Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims ," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 126-140.
    10. Liu, Yanfeng & Cai, Lanhui & Ma, Fei & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "Revenge buying after the lockdown: Based on the SOR framework and TPB model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Samson, Alain & Voyer, Benjamin G., 2014. "Emergency purchasing situations: Implications for consumer decision-making," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 21-33.
    12. Richetin, Juliette & Mattavelli, Simone & Perugini, Marco, 2016. "Increasing implicit and explicit attitudes toward an organic food brand by referencing to oneself," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 96-108.
    13. Fortin, David R. & Dholakia, Ruby Roy, 2005. "Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 387-396, March.
    14. Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2009. "Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 935-949, 09-10.
    15. Haase, Janina & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter, 2020. "The implicit sensory association test (ISAT): A measurement approach for sensory perception," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 236-245.
    16. Uhm, Jun-Phil & Kim, Sanghoon & Do, Chanwook & Lee, Hyun-Woo, 2022. "How augmented reality (AR) experience affects purchase intention in sport E-commerce: Roles of perceived diagnosticity, psychological distance, and perceived risks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Zhang, Jing & Yun, Jin Ho & Lee, Eun-Ju, 2021. "Brain buzz for Facebook? Neural indicators of SNS content engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 444-452.
    18. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi, 2019. "Chat now… Examining the variables influencing the use of online live chat," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 55-67.
    19. Jaud, David A. & Melnyk, Valentyna, 2020. "The effect of text-only versus text-and-image wine labels on liking, taste and purchase intentions. The mediating role of affective fluency," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Ghosh, Tathagata & S., Sreejesh & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "Examining the Deferred Effects of Gaming Platform and Game Speed of Advergames on Memory, Attitude, and Purchase Intention," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 52-66.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:10:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-019-00155-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.