IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v6y2016i1p2158244016635717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Contingency and Advising Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Shinyi Lin

Abstract

The issue of teaching and learning accountability has been discussed for years. This study focuses specifically on advising accountability of management education to explore how faculty advisors communicate with their student advisees using instant messaging (IM) to enhance advising presence primarily based on Tetlock’s social contingency model. The dependent relationships between advisor and advisee are considered a cohort, and their collaboration as a community of practice. Of the 254 graduate students in the college of management, the result reveals that their perception of advising accountability has been casually explained by the antecedents, that is, self-efficacy, advising presence, epistemic engagement, advisor credibility, and their flow experience toward using IM to communicate with their thesis advisors. The research finding validates intervening factors between students’ perception of IM self-efficacy and advising accountability of thesis advisors. The findings, regardless of the limited generalization, provide prescriptive implications that educational practitioners can use to evaluate related issues of advising accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Shinyi Lin, 2016. "Social Contingency and Advising Accountability," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:2158244016635717
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244016635717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244016635717
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244016635717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hochwarter, Wayne A. & Ferris, Gerald R. & Gavin, Mark B. & Perrewe, Pamela L. & Hall, Angela T. & Frink, Dwight D., 2007. "Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability--job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 226-239, March.
    2. Lindkvist, Lars & Llewellyn, Sue, 2003. "Accountability, responsibility and organization," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 251-273, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eldor, Liat & Hodor, Michal & Cappelli, Peter, 2023. "The limits of psychological safety: Nonlinear relationships with performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Peng, Ann C. & Dunn, Jennifer & Conlon, Donald E., 2015. "When vigilance prevails: The effect of regulatory focus and accountability on integrative negotiation outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 77-87.
    3. Bracci, Enrico, 2009. "Autonomy, responsibility and accountability in the Italian school system," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 293-312.
    4. Welton Chang & Pavel Atanasov & Shefali Patil & Barbara A. Mellers & Philip E. Tetlock, 2017. "Accountability and adaptive performance under uncertainty: A long-term view," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(6), pages 610-626, November.
    5. Casenave, Eric & Klarmann, Martin, 2020. "The accountability paradox: How holding marketers accountable hinders alignment with short-term marketing goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 95-108.
    6. Bénédicte Affo, 2019. "Le Role Des Interactions Numeriques Dans La Sante Psychosociale Des Travailleurs : Une Approche Par Le Modele Du Desequilibre Efforts/Recompenses," Post-Print halshs-02468876, HAL.
    7. Vivian Chen, Chun-Hsi & Yuan, Mei-Ling & Cheng, Jen-Wei & Seifert, Roger, 2016. "Linking transformational leadership and core self-evaluation to job performance: The mediating role of felt accountability," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 234-246.
    8. Mucha Anna, 2016. "If Emotional Labor meets Micropolitics: Strategisches Surface Acting im Umgang mit emotionalen Anforderungen in subjektivierten Arbeitskontexten," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1-2), pages 47-56, October.
    9. Li‐Qun Wei & Jun Liu & Yuan‐Yi Chen & Long‐Zeng Wu, 2010. "Political Skill, Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi and Career Prospects in Chinese Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 437-454, May.
    10. Sheppard, Leah D. & O'Reilly, Jane & van Dijke, Marius & Restubog, Simon Lloyd D. & Aquino, Karl, 2020. "The stress-relieving benefits of positively experienced social sexual behavior in the workplace," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 38-52.
    11. Ping-Ju Wu & Tung-Ju Wu & Kuo-Shu Yuan, 2019. "“Green” Information Promotes Employees’ Voluntary Green Behavior via Work Values and Perceived Accountability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Chynoweth, Sarah K. & Zwi, Anthony B. & Whelan, Anna K., 2018. "Socializing accountability in humanitarian settings: A proposed framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 149-162.
    13. O’Leary, Susan, 2017. "Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 21-41.
    14. Yasmin, Sofia & Ghafran, Chaudhry & Haniffa, Roszaini, 2018. "Exploring de-facto accountability regimes in Muslim NGOs," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 235-247.
    15. Lavigne, Eric, 2018. "How structural and procedural features of managers' performance appraisals facilitate their politicization: A study of Canadian university deans’ reappointments," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 638-648.
    16. Desai, Sreedhari D. & Kouchaki, Maryam, 2015. "Work-report formats and overbilling: How unit-reporting vs. cost-reporting increases accountability and decreases overbilling," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 79-88.
    17. Paul M. Collier, 2008. "Stakeholder accountability," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 933-954, September.
    18. Ryan W. Buell & Tami Kim & Chia-Jung Tsay, 2017. "Creating Reciprocal Value Through Operational Transparency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1673-1695, June.
    19. Sue Llewellyn, 2005. "Performance, Productivity and Innovation in Health Care Organisations: Comparing England and Scotland," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(37), pages 15-24, November.
    20. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:6:p:610-626 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:2158244016635717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.