IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v21y2017i2p192-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Influential Aspects of TV Advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Ajay Kumar
  • Ruchi Sharma

Abstract

There are plethora of studies highlighting the impact of advertising on various aspects of consumer behaviour. Still, there is dearth of studies scrutinizing the advertisements by exploring the influential aspects of advertising. This study attempts to find out the various influential aspects of advertisements and how these aspects influence the product selection, lifestyle and children behaviour. Study is carried out in one of the economically developed states of India (Haryana) using stratified convenience sampling. Data is collected from 421 respondents using a structured questionnaire. Results are generated by application of factor analysis and regression analysis. Seven influential aspects of advertisements were identified in the study—influence on children, positive influence on purchase, influence on social status, influence on attitude and behaviour, negative influence, influence on perceived quality and influence on women. Study further highlighted that two influential aspects—negative influence and influence on women—do not contribute to product selection, lifestyle and children behaviour. Rest of the influential aspects were found out to be impacting either product selection, lifestyle and children behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajay Kumar & Ruchi Sharma, 2017. "Perceived Influential Aspects of TV Advertising," Paradigm, , vol. 21(2), pages 192-210, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:21:y:2017:i:2:p:192-210
    DOI: 10.1177/0971890717736216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890717736216
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971890717736216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, Elizabeth S & Lutz, Richard J, 2000. "Children, Advertising, and Product Experiences: A Multimethod Inquiry," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 31-48, June.
    2. Calder, Bobby J & Phillips, Lynn W & Tybout, Alice M, 1981. "Designing Research for Application," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(2), pages 197-207, September.
    3. Fred S. Zufryden, 1987. "A Model for Relating Advertising Media Exposures to Purchase Incidence Behavior Patterns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(10), pages 1253-1266, October.
    4. Robertson, Thomas S & Rossiter, John R, 1974. "Children and Commercial Persuasion: An Attribution Theory Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(1), pages 13-20, June.
    5. Belk, Russell W & Pollay, Richard W, 1985. "Images of Ourselves: The Good Life in Twentieth Century Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(4), pages 887-897, March.
    6. James D. King & Jason B. McConnell, 2003. "The Effect of Negative Campaign Advertising on Vote Choice: The Mediating Influence of Gender," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(4), pages 843-857, December.
    7. Vinay Kanetkar & Charles B. Weinberg & Doyle L. Weiss, 1992. "Price Sensitivity and Television Advertising Exposures: Some Empirical Findings," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 359-371.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iris Vermeir & Dieneke Sompel, 2014. "Assessing the What Is Beautiful Is Good Stereotype and the Influence of Moderately Attractive and Less Attractive Advertising Models on Self-Perception, Ad Attitudes, and Purchase Intentions of 8–13-Y," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 205-233, June.
    2. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    3. Balaji, M.S. & Roy, Sanjit Kumar & Sadeque, Saalem, 2016. "Antecedents and consequences of university brand identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3023-3032.
    4. Komal Nagar, 2018. "Assessing the Impact of Online Retailer Models on Consumer’s Attitude and Purchase Intentions," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2008. "Through the Eye of a Child," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 243-255, August.
    6. Wann-Yih Wu & Phan Thi Phu Quyen & Adriana A. Amaya Rivas, 2017. "How e-servicescapes affect customer online shopping intention: the moderating effects of gender and online purchasing experience," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-715, August.
    7. Lepp, Andrew & Gibson, Heather & Lane, Charles, 2011. "Image and perceived risk: A study of Uganda and its official tourism website," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 675-684.
    8. Mohammed-Aminu Sanda & Pearl Adjei-Benin, 2011. "How is the Firm Dealing with the Merger?A Study of Employee Satisfaction with the Change Process," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 28-37, June.
    9. Söderlund, Magnus & Sagfossen, Sofie, 2017. "The consumer experience: The impact of supplier effort and consumer effort on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 219-229.
    10. Hupfer, Maureen E. & Detlor, Brian, 2007. "Beyond gender differences: Self-concept orientation and relationship-building applications on the Internet," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 613-619, June.
    11. Pat Auger & Timothy Devinney, 2007. "Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 361-383, December.
    12. Béatrice Parguel & Florence Benoît-Moreau, 2008. "Communication sociétale des enseignes, le consommateur est-il toujours dupe ? le rôle de la réputation," Post-Print halshs-00287120, HAL.
    13. Ariel Chernin, 2008. "The Effects of Food Marketing on Children's Preferences: Testing the Moderating Roles of Age and Gender," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 615(1), pages 101-118, January.
    14. Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Michel Laroche, 2017. "When Materialists Intend to Resist Consumption: The Moderating Role of Self-Control and Long-Term Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 467-483, July.
    15. van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & Rozendaal, Esther & Buijzen, Moniek, 2012. "Effects of Prominence, Involvement, and Persuasion Knowledge on Children's Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advergames," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 33-42.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2554 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Erik Hunter & Per Davidsson, 2007. "Celebrity entrepreneurship: communication effectiveness through perceived involvement," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5), pages 505-527.
    18. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Alice Audrezet & Gwarlann Caffier de Kerviler, 2011. "Comment réduire la distance perçue vis-à-vis d'une cause humanitaire ? L'influence de l'abstraction linguistique et de la valence d'un message," Post-Print halshs-00685641, HAL.
    20. Eiji Yamamura, 2021. "Granddaughter and voting for a female candidate," Papers 2102.13464, arXiv.org.
    21. Béatrice Parguel & Florence Benoît-Moreau & Fabrice Larceneux, 2011. "How Sustainability Ratings Might Deter ‘Greenwashing’: A Closer Look at Ethical Corporate Communication," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 15-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:21:y:2017:i:2:p:192-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.