IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v45y2008i2p105-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boundaries and Territoriality in South Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Atul Mishra

    (The author is Doctoral candidate in international politics at the Centre for International Politics, Organization and Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. Email: ontic@in.com)

Abstract

This article examines the theoretical salience of territoriality, particularly in South Asia, by comparing the histories of the region's three most contentious boundaries—Durand, McMahon and Radcliffe lines. It argues that four distinct avenues are central to theoretical considerations on territoriality in South Asia: the role of liberalism in colonial construction of state; international and domestic dimensions of geopolitics; disruptions in demographic and cultural contiguities produced by the boundaries; and the nature of sovereignty resulting from the experience of colonialism. Traditional lenses for studying boundaries and territoriality offer limited analytical purchase. The article posits that critical geopolitics and history-intensive approaches allow a better grasp of material and discursive dimensions of territoriality. Such an eclectic consideration is especially suitable for studying territoriality in South Asia given the region's cross-border complexities, both real and symbolic.

Suggested Citation

  • Atul Mishra, 2008. "Boundaries and Territoriality in South Asia," International Studies, , vol. 45(2), pages 105-132, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:45:y:2008:i:2:p:105-132
    DOI: 10.1177/002088170804500202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002088170804500202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002088170804500202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruggie, John Gerard, 1993. "Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 139-174, January.
    2. Osiander, Andreas, 2001. "Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(2), pages 251-287, April.
    3. Teschke, Benno, 1998. "Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 325-358, April.
    4. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 191-219, March.
    2. Ines Wagner, 2015. "The Political Economy of Borders in a 'Borderless' European Labour Market," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1370-1385, November.
    3. Clayton L. Thyne, 2006. "Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(6), pages 937-961, December.
    4. Daniel Connolly & Alexander M. Hynd, 2023. "The construction and enforcement of East Asia’s air defence identification zones: Grey volumes in the sky?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(5), pages 1029-1046, August.
    5. Fricke, Carola, 2014. "Grenzüberschreitende Governance in der Raumplanung: Organisations- und Kooperationsformen in Basel und Lille," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 62-78, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 123-152, September.
    7. Eyüp Özveren & Utku Havuç & Emrah Karaoğuz, 2012. "From Stages to Varieties of Capitalism: Lessons, Limits and Prospects," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 59(1), pages 13-36, March.
    8. Monterescu, Daniel, 2011. "Estranged Natives and Indigenized Immigrants: A Relational Anthropology of Ethnically Mixed Towns in Israel," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 270-281, February.
    9. Andrew T. Young, 2021. "The political economy of feudalism in medieval Europe," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 127-143, March.
    10. Arshid Iqbal Dar, 2021. "Beyond Eurocentrism: Kautilya’s realism and India’s regional diplomacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    12. Çağıl T. Etkin & Nusret Sinan Evcan, 2021. "Analyzing Multi-Definitional Problems of Concepts in International Relations: Re-Conceptualizing Change," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    13. Peter Maskell & Mark Lorenzen, 2004. "The Cluster as Market Organisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 991-1009, May.
    14. Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Zangl, Bernhard, 2015. "Which post-Westphalia? International organizations between constitutionalism and authoritarianism," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 21(3), pages 568-594.
    15. Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, 2002. "Types of Multi-Level Governance," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    16. Verena K. Brändle & Olga Eisele, 2023. "A Thin Line: Governmental Border Communication in Times of European Crises," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 597-615, May.
    17. Peter Maskell & Mark Lorenzen, 2003. "The Cluster as Market Organization," DRUID Working Papers 03-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    18. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Contested Borders: Globalization and Ethnonational Conflict in Ireland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 681-696.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5cde916r449019gijqqul3ilgr is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Bohle, Dorothee, 1999. "Der Pfad in die Abhängigkeit? Eine kritische Bewertung institutionalistischer Beiträge in der Transformationsdebatte," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 99-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    21. SOHN Christophe & LICHERON Julien, 2015. "From barrier to resource? Modelling the border effects on metropolitan functions in Europe," LISER Working Paper Series 2015-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:45:y:2008:i:2:p:105-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.