IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v9y2019i2p123-152n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering

Author

Listed:
  • Leandro Francisco José

    (Institute for Research on Portuguese Speaking Countries, City University of Macau, Avenida Xian Xing Hai 105, Centro Golden Dragon, Room G512A, Macau SAR, People’s Republic of China)

Abstract

This paper argues that the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a de-bordering mechanism makes a positive contribution to border security. Three central concepts—de-bordering, re-bordering and co-bordering—are used to examine the future of borders, and further develop the notion of the “cycle” of borders. This research adopts a political science perspective and combines the theory of borders with the Copenhagen School and Paris School of security, bearing in mind the BRI as an access strategy. Furthermore, the BRI elements of connectivity are central to de-bordering. Finally, this paper maintains that the BRI makes different contributions to border security, that borders are “alive”, and that they are the result of cooperative or antagonistic human interactions in which asymmetry in perception is the leading cause of conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 123-152, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:123-152:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2019-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0017
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bjes-2019-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.
    2. Anssi Paasi, 1999. "Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse: The Finnish-Russian Border," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 669-680.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. SOHN Christophe & LICHERON Julien, 2015. "From barrier to resource? Modelling the border effects on metropolitan functions in Europe," LISER Working Paper Series 2015-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    2. Fricke, Carola, 2014. "Grenzüberschreitende Governance in der Raumplanung: Organisations- und Kooperationsformen in Basel und Lille," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 62-78, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    4. Atul Mishra, 2008. "Boundaries and Territoriality in South Asia," International Studies, , vol. 45(2), pages 105-132, April.
    5. Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Borders as opportunities in the space-economy: towards a theory of enabling space," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 223-239, February.
    6. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Contested Borders: Globalization and Ethnonational Conflict in Ireland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 681-696.
    7. Vinayaraj V.K., 2011. "Finland’s Self-Defence Strategies," International Studies, , vol. 48(3-4), pages 257-280, July.
    8. Jorde Eduardo Mendoza & Bruno Dupeyron, 2017. "Economic Integration, Emerging Fields and Cross-border Governance: The Case of San Diego–Tijuana," Post-Print halshs-01588578, HAL.
    9. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.
    10. Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces. A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Discussion Papers 2009/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    11. Sanjay K. Bhardwaj, 2013. "India–Bangladesh Border Governance," International Studies, , vol. 50(1-2), pages 109-129, January.
    12. Scherhag, Daniela, 2008. "Europäische Grenzraumforschung," E-Paper der ARL, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, volume 2, number 2.
    13. Vaishar Antonín & Šťastná Milada, 2016. "Bojkovice: Transformation of a peripheral micro-region at the Czech-Slovak border," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 32(32), pages 131-145, June.
    14. Michaela Trippl, 2006. "Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2006_05, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    15. Bianca B. Szytniewski & Bas Spierings, 2018. "Place Image Formation and Cross‐Border Shopping: German Shoppers in the Polish Bazaar in Słubice," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(2), pages 295-308, April.
    16. Anna A. Dekalchuk, 2014. "Schengen Borders In Practice: Facts About Finland (And Russia)," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/IR/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    17. William Kutz, 2017. "Municipalizing geo-economic statecraft: Crisis and transition in Europe," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(6), pages 1224-1246, June.
    18. REITEL Bernard, 2011. "La frontière internationale, objet sémique, processus multidimensionnel, interface signifiante," LISER Working Paper Series 2011-43, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    19. Dimitris Kallioras & George Petrakos & Maria Tsiapa & Lefteris Topaloglou, 2011. "The Determinants of Growth in EU Border Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p702, European Regional Science Association.
    20. repec:abr:oajaas:v:2:y:2020:i:3:p:242-245 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Michaela Trippl, 2010. "Developing Cross‐Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors And Challenges," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(2), pages 150-160, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:123-152:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.